Last Fortress: Underground Game Cover

"Last Fortress: Underground" is a post-apocalyptic survival game where you lead a group of survivors to build and customize an underground shelter, while managing resources and recruiting heroes with unique skills to ensure your community's survival against zombie hordes. Fight, explore, and strategize to restore hope in this dark, desolate world.

  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Phone
  • Android
  • Mobile Platform
  • Tablet

Reviews

62%
Audience ScoreBased on 9,999 reviews
graphics363 positive mentions
monetization374 negative mentions
  • The game has great graphics and an engaging storyline.
  • It offers a lot of content and activities to keep players busy.
  • Players can progress without spending money, although it may take longer.
  • The game is heavily pay-to-win, making it difficult for free-to-play players to compete.
  • There are frequent bugs and crashes that disrupt gameplay.
  • Players often experience bullying from higher-level players, leading to frustration.
  • graphics500 mentions

    The graphics of the game receive generally positive feedback, with many users praising their quality and design, describing them as "great," "excellent," and "amazing." However, some players express concerns about performance issues, such as lag and crashes, particularly on lower-end devices, and note that the graphics do not always match the promotional materials. Overall, while the visuals are a highlight for many, there are calls for optimization and improvements to enhance the gaming experience.

    • “The graphics are phenomenal!!”
    • “This game is absolutely addicting, the graphics are fantastic, and the gameplay is engaging.”
    • “Great graphics, interesting story, fun game mechanics.”
    • “The graphics inside the fortress look ok, but outside it's dull and nothing stands out; battles are dull, combat is scripted and weird.”
    • “I wish the graphics were more like the advertisement; I can't wait for there to be a game that is exactly like we see before downloading.”
    • “The graphics are quite low compared to other high graphic games.”
  • monetization495 mentions

    The monetization aspect of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users criticizing the misleading advertisements that do not accurately represent the gameplay. Players report that the game is heavily reliant on in-app purchases, often labeling it a "pay-to-win" experience, where significant progress is difficult without spending money. While some users appreciate the absence of intrusive ads, the overall sentiment is that the game is a cash grab, with high prices for in-game items and a gameplay experience that diverges significantly from what is shown in the ads.

    • “Can play for free, or buy in-game purchases, but not necessary to enjoy the game.”
    • “It's fun, fast-paced, and doesn't require millions of in-app purchases to make any real progress, which is the case with other similar games.”
    • “Good game, no ads, don't need to buy anything to progress.”
    • “The advertising is definitely deceptive; it is a money pit. You have to spend money in order to grow, and I mean use money for everything. I am uninstalling. It would have been better if the makers hadn't made it a little bit better than this. It is ridiculous, and another thing that is totally ridiculous is they don't even supply shields unless you pay a ridiculously high price for it. This is definitely a pay-to-play game.”
    • “The ads show a completely different type of gameplay than this game really is. The game is designed to drain your bank account with expensive in-game purchases.”
    • “Be warned, the game is absolutely nothing like the advertisements you've seen. It's a pay-to-play game despite the lying ads!”
  • story440 mentions

    The game's story has received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating the initial engaging narrative and graphics, but expressing frustration as the storyline becomes less prominent and often feels forced or repetitive. Bugs and glitches frequently hinder progress, leading to a disjointed experience where players find themselves stuck on missions or unable to complete objectives. While some enjoy the strategic elements tied to the story, others feel that the game devolves into a grind, overshadowing the narrative potential.

    • “The story isn't bad either.”
    • “Great graphics, interesting story, fun game mechanics.”
    • “I love the storyline and gameplay.”
    • “The storyline only seems to last during the tutorial and a few moments after.”
    • “The story part is only a few scenes and then no more.”
    • “The story is also full of grammar and other errors and makes no sense.”
  • stability378 mentions

    The game's stability is a significant concern among users, with many reporting frequent crashes, freezes, and various glitches that disrupt gameplay. While some players appreciate the game's concept and potential, the overwhelming number of bugs and the slow response from customer support have led to frustration and dissatisfaction. Overall, the game is described as being in a beta-like state, requiring urgent fixes to improve stability and user experience.

    • “It's a pretty cool time waster and so far no glitches.”
    • “No glitches and actually looks like the ads.”
    • “Good game to pass time, no glitches so far.”
    • “Very buggy, game crashes and closes randomly. The latest update caused notifications to stop working, and I was attacked and killed repeatedly while offline without me knowing anything was wrong.”
    • “The game constantly crashes and kicks you back to your home screen or freezes. It's incredibly buggy.”
    • “This game has so many glitches it doesn't even take 10 minutes to be completely unplayable.”
  • gameplay330 mentions

    Gameplay reviews are mixed, with some players praising its engaging mechanics and graphics, while others criticize it for being repetitive, buggy, and heavily reliant on pay-to-win elements. Many users express frustration over misleading advertisements that do not accurately represent the actual gameplay experience, and several mention issues with balance and resource management. Overall, while some find the gameplay enjoyable and addictive, others feel it is marred by technical problems and monetization strategies.

    • “Good game so far still playing, if there is a base builder's zombie apocalypse game that grabs the player and keeps them interested in the gameplay, this is it!”
    • “Gameplay is fantastic, so great job for a free game to a degree.”
    • “The gameplay does not get stale and pays amazing attention to the fine details, thank you!”
    • “Gameplay was repetitive and frustrating; okay for a short while, do not recommend paying for the game or playing for long.”
    • “This game is bleeding players because of its pay-to-win and overall gameplay.”
    • “The gameplay is very far from the advertisement.”
  • grinding74 mentions

    The grinding aspect of the game is widely criticized for being excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring players to log in frequently to manage resources and defend against stronger opponents. While some players find enjoyment in the grind, many express frustration over the pay-to-win mechanics that exacerbate the grind, making it difficult for free-to-play users to progress without significant effort. Overall, the game is seen as a mix of fun and frustration, heavily reliant on grinding for advancement.

    • “It is an ok game seems to want you to spend money but you can get around it if you do not mind grinding. The only real issue I have is you can only zoom out so far, meaning you cannot see your entire base at one time.”
    • “You have to spend hours grinding to get anything done and then you can be attacked 10 times by one person and have them completely destroy you with no way to defend yourself. Yeah, not a fan; I'm uninstalling. Don't waste your time.”
    • “The game is designed to be tedious in order to make you pay to avoid tediousness.”
  • music22 mentions

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising the soundtrack and sound effects as enjoyable and fitting, while others express frustration over the inability to mute or control the music effectively, leading to distractions during gameplay. Additionally, there are reports of audio glitches and issues with background music continuing to play despite attempts to turn it off. Overall, while the music has its highlights, technical problems detract from the experience for many users.

    • “The graphics, the soundtrack, and the sound effects are all amazing...so far.”
    • “The background music in the settlement is somewhat comfortable and relaxing; it gives a sense of survival unlike the other with horrifying music.”
    • “It has a great concept and it executed that concept very well; this game also has nice music.”
    • “Last random complaint: I couldn't turn sound/music off.”
    • “Also, why can't I find a way to turn off background music?”
    • “Just hits 100 percent and sits there playing stupid background music forever... nothing changes this situation...”
  • optimization21 mentions

    Overall, the game's optimization has received significant criticism, with users reporting frequent crashes, freezing, and performance issues across various devices. While some players note that graphics and performance are acceptable, many express frustration over visual bugs and the need for better optimization to enhance gameplay. Additionally, concerns about the game's monetization practices overshadowing performance improvements have been highlighted.

    • “The gameplay loop is great, but the game as a whole could be optimized better.”
    • “The setting and optimization of the alliance are really comfortable.”
    • “This game is indeed good, but you guys need to work on optimization; it's not smooth, it's kind of choppy. You guys need to fix it as soon as possible, and this game is a hit.”
    • “Edit: unfortunately, this game seems to not be properly optimized as it freezes and crashes at random times.”
    • “Overall graphics need to be optimized for better performance.”
    • “Latest version is horrendous; constant freezing and very poorly optimized, often freezing my phone.”
  • humor20 mentions

    The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with many players finding the poor English translations and awkward dialogue to be unintentionally funny. While some aspects, like the quirky character designs and food production mechanics, elicit laughter, the overall execution often leads to frustration, especially with frequent crashes and costly in-game purchases. Despite these issues, players appreciate the game's comedic potential, labeling it as "hilariously bad" and entertaining in its own right.

    • “This game is hilarious.”
    • “It's a funny zombie thriller game.”
    • “The bad grammar is hilarious and peak camp though.”
  • character development5 mentions

    Character development in the game is generally viewed as a mixed bag; while the character designs are praised for their appeal and the storyline is engaging, there are suggestions that the English dialogue and overall character development could use improvement. Players appreciate the unique characters, such as the head chef, which enhance their experience, but some feel that deeper development is needed for a more immersive narrative.

    • “I ended up spending because I wanted the beautiful head chef character, Tikka. The character designs of this game are on point; that's one of the things that kept me engaged, aside from my active alliance.”
    • “Bethesda flavor with an engaging storyline and character development!”
    • “Fantastically easy and great story and character development.”
    • “Character development and English dialogue need work but are okay.”
    • “I did end up spending, but only because I wanted the beautiful head chef character, Tikka. With that said, the character designs of this game are on point; that's one of the things that got me to stay (aside from my active alliance).”
  • emotional4 mentions

    The emotional aspect of the game is described as heartfelt and captivating, yet players struggle to form attachments to the characters, leading to a sense that their time spent playing feels inconsequential. While the game can be enjoyable for passing time, the lack of deeper emotional engagement diminishes the overall experience.

    • “The development is heartfelt and captivating.”
    • “Made me feel like the time I spent playing to progress doesn't matter.”
  • replayability2 mentions

    Reviewers note that the developers are actively enhancing the game's replayability through regular updates, making it more enjoyable and accessible compared to similar titles in the genre.

    • “You can feel that the developers are making this game more playable for everyone; I can see it in the updates.”
    • “Every other game of this type is much more playable and enjoyable.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Last Fortress: Underground

Play time

5hMedian play time
5hAverage play time
2-9hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 12 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games