KUUKIYOMI: Consider It! ONLINE
- June 19, 2022
- G-MODE
Get on SteamOne, two, all together. Now KUUKIYOMI with everyone in the world.
PC
Windows
Reviews
- The game is very funny and provides a lot of laughs, especially when played with friends.
- The unique gameplay and art style are enjoyable, making it a fun party game.
- The multiplayer aspect is engaging, and the voting system adds a clever twist to the gameplay.
- The game lacks sufficient content and replayability, especially considering its transition to a paid model.
- There are not enough players online, making it difficult to fill lobbies and start games.
- Some players have experienced technical issues, such as crashes and unresponsive controls.
- humor8 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is widely praised, with many players finding it genuinely hilarious and capable of eliciting laughter, especially in multiplayer settings. The scenarios and overall comedic elements are noted to effectively engage players' senses of humor.
“This game is very funny.”
“Funny as hell.”
“The scenarios are pretty funny.”
- replayability2 mentions
- 150 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 150 % negative mentions
Players express concerns about the game's replayability, noting that while the minigames are enjoyable, they lack sufficient content to warrant repeated play, especially following the transition from a free to a paid early access model.
“The minigames are enjoyable, but I feel they lack the depth needed for significant replayability given the changes in development.”
“While the game has its merits, I don't find it offers enough content to justify extensive replayability.”
“The initial free version had potential, but the transition to a paid model hasn't added enough replayable content.”
“This was initially a free game, but the developers decided to change it to a paid early access game. I'm not sure I entirely follow this decision, as the game, while made decently, doesn't offer a replayable amount of content.”
“After completing the main storyline, I found little incentive to return. The lack of diverse gameplay options really limits its replayability.”
“While the graphics are impressive, the gameplay feels repetitive after a few hours, making it hard to justify multiple playthroughs.”
- graphics2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 100 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The graphics are praised for their unique art style, enhancing the overall gameplay experience. However, some users feel that the game's price point of $9 may not justify the visual quality.
- gameplay2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- -50 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The gameplay is praised for its uniqueness and engaging art style, though some users feel the price point of $9 is excessive. There is also a desire for the addition of a friend-only play mode to enhance the experience.
“I love the gameplay; I hope they add a way for us to play with friends only.”
“I love the art style and the unique gameplay.”
“I love the art style and the unique gameplay, but for $9, it's too much.”
- monetization1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -500 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The monetization in the game is present but is generally considered acceptable since it is a free-to-play title, leading to a mixed but largely indifferent reception among users.
“There's monetization, but it's a free game, so it's whatever.”
“The monetization is fair and doesn't feel intrusive, allowing me to enjoy the game without pressure.”
“I appreciate that the monetization options are optional and don't affect gameplay balance.”
“The monetization feels excessive for a free game, making it hard to enjoy without spending money.”
“I appreciate that it's a free game, but the constant push for in-game purchases is frustrating.”
“While I understand the need for monetization, it often overshadows the gameplay experience.”
