Khet 2.0

About

"Khet 2.0" is a strategy board game with elements of chess and laser beams. Players move mirrored pieces and attempt to hit their opponent's king pharaoh with a laser, while avoiding being struck themselves. The game features both a physical and digital board, with multiple difficulty levels and game modes available in the digital version.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Local Multi-Player Play with friends in the same physical space using split-screen or multiple screens
2-Players Play with one other player, either online or locally, in a cooperative or competitive game mode
Multi-Player Compete or cooperate with other players online
Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo
Split Screen Play with multiple players on the same screen, often with divided or shared screen real estate

93%

Audience ScoreBased on 120 reviews

humor3 positive mentions

stability5 negative mentions

Khet 2.0 is a fun and engaging strategy game that combines elements of chess with lasers, making it a unique experience for players.
The game is easy to learn, allowing new players to quickly grasp the rules while still offering depth and complexity for more experienced players.
The digital version is a faithful adaptation of the board game, providing a convenient way to play without the setup time required for physical board games.

The AI is often too easy to defeat, even on the highest difficulty settings, which can lead to a lack of challenge for seasoned players.
The multiplayer aspect is severely limited due to a lack of active players online, making it difficult to find matches and enjoy the game with others.
The game suffers from technical issues, including crashes and bugs, which can detract from the overall experience and frustrate players.

graphics
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
63%
19%
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with many users describing them as low-quality, bland, and simplistic, which detracts from the overall experience. While some players acknowledge that the game is not designed for high-end visuals and can still be enjoyable, others express a desire for sharper graphics to enhance the aesthetic appeal. Overall, the graphics are seen as a weak point, with a consensus that improvements could elevate the game's presentation.
- “Still, it would, in my opinion, be an improvement if the graphics were better because it pleases the eye.”
- “My game defaulted to a lower graphics quality, which was still okay, but after I went into the settings menu, I increased the quality to a pleasant-to-look-at quality like the screenshots here on Steam.”
- “A very well made version of the board game, without pointless visuals or silliness that could slow down or spoil the game itself.”
- “Low poly/simple graphics don't help the cause.”
- “Took me a while to find the graphics options in the menu; the game doesn't look too good with the default settings.”
- “The graphics are fairly boring, bland, and poor.”
gameplay
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
45%
27%
The gameplay is described as addictive and engaging, with simple rules that lead to complex strategies, reminiscent of a modernized chess experience. However, some players criticize the poor graphics and lack of communication options, which detract from the overall enjoyment. While the game offers a unique concept, comparisons to other titles suggest it may not stand out in terms of fun or value.
- “And be warned - the gameplay is kind of addictive.”
- “I'd say it is a game of the best kind - it has simple rules, but the gameplay can be complex and hard to win.”
- “The gameplay and fun of Khet comes down to pitting wits against friends, opponents, or AI and approaching a win while maneuvering an attack and simultaneously paying attention to defense. If you like the idea of an arguably simpler chess, it's an easy sell.”
- “However, due to its poor graphics and boring gameplay, since I know other games exist that are massively more fun, I can't imagine myself playing this game much at all, if ever.”
- “Similarly, chatting in-game is impossible, and communicating via Steam is the only current option, which pauses gameplay and causes frustration.”
- “While it does significantly affect gameplay, and is priced fairly, it's still hard to view this as anything other than a cash grab.”
stability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game has been reported to have several stability issues, including bugs that cause freezing and crashes, particularly during online play. While some users noted that the game improved after initial glitches, the presence of persistent bugs and intrusive third-party DRM has been a significant concern for many players. Overall, stability remains a notable drawback for this title.
- “The game is a little buggy and features draconian/spyware-like third-party DRM, which is a big no-no, especially for bundleware/shovelware like this.”
- “The game is very buggy and crashed multiple times when I was trying to play an online game with a friend.”
- “It glitches if you walk one of your pieces up the right flank.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
150%
The music in the game is generally appreciated for its pleasant background quality, though some users feel it could be improved or made more ambient. Additionally, there is a desire for options to choose different music genres to enhance the experience.
- “The background music is nice and enhances the overall experience.”
- “It would be great if the music could be more ambient or if players had the option to choose the genre.”
- “The music could definitely be improved; it lacks variety and depth.”
- “I wish there was an option to choose the genre of music, as the current soundtrack feels repetitive.”
- “The ambient music doesn't really fit the game's atmosphere, making it feel disconnected.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
It seems there was an error in your message, as no specific user reviews or texts about the "story" aspect were provided. Please share the relevant reviews, and I will be happy to summarize them for you!
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The monetization strategy is seen as a cash grab despite being fairly priced and having a significant impact on gameplay.
- “While it does significantly affect gameplay and is priced fairly, it's still hard to view this as anything other than a cash grab.”
- “The monetization model feels exploitative, as it pushes players to spend more to enjoy the full experience.”
- “I appreciate the free-to-play aspect, but the constant prompts to purchase items are overwhelming and detract from the enjoyment.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The humor in the game is highlighted as particularly effective, with players enjoying a "really funny mirror experience" that adds a unique comedic element to the gameplay.
- “The game features a really funny mirror experience.”
- “The humor is spot-on and keeps you laughing throughout.”
- “I love the witty dialogue and hilarious character interactions.”