Skip to main content

Kerbal Space Program 2

Kerbal Space Program 2 Game Cover
25%Game Brain Score
graphics, story
optimization, stability
25% User Score Based on 24,579 reviews

Platforms

Xbox Series X|SPCPlaystation 5CloudPlaystation 4Xbox OneXboxNVIDIA GeForce NOWWindowsPlayStation
Kerbal Space Program 2 Game Cover

About

Kerbal Space Program 2 is a single player and multiplayer open world simulation game with a science fiction theme. It was developed by Intercept Games and was released on February 24, 2023. It received negative reviews from players.

Kerbal Space Program 2 is a sequel to its award winning 2015 predecessor, space sim Kerbal Space Program. A game where you lead green creatures called Kerbals to space by constructing rockets of varying success rates. KSP2 is planned to bring the franchise to new frontiers, with colonies, interstellar travel, and multiplayer. As of June 28th 2024, the development studio behind it, Intercept Games…

Skip User Reviews

25%
Audience ScoreBased on 24,579 reviews
graphics734 positive mentions
optimization837 negative mentions

  • Significantly improved graphics and sound design, including stunning visuals, enhanced lighting, and dynamic, context-sensitive music that greatly enhance immersion and atmosphere.
  • Core gameplay mechanics retain the original's accurate orbital simulation, precise maneuvers, and engaging tutorials, with new missions and tech trees adding direction and progression.
  • Recent updates have fixed many bugs and optimized performance to a degree, making the game more playable and enjoyable than at launch, with improved replayability for space exploration enthusiasts.
  • Still plagued by frequent bugs, crashes, physics glitches, and save corruption, making the game unstable and frustrating for many players.
  • Poor optimization and severe performance issues, including frame drops and stuttering, are common even on high-end hardware, severely impacting gameplay experience.
  • The game lacks many promised features from its predecessor, has an incomplete and underdeveloped gameplay loop, tedious UI and building mechanics, and is widely regarded as an unfinished, abandoned early access title with questionable monetization.
  • optimization
    3,077 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Kerbal Space Program 2 suffers from severe optimization and performance issues, causing frequent frame drops, stuttering, and poor FPS even on high-end hardware. While patches have improved stability and some performance aspects, the game remains poorly optimized with significant bugs, making it often unplayable or frustrating, especially during complex missions or with large spacecraft. Despite the potential and better graphics compared to its predecessor, ongoing optimization is crucial before recommending the game broadly.

    • “To be honest, I had no performance issues; I was running max graphics, crashed a couple of ships, and kept a constant 60 fps.”
    • “Amazing, especially as they've continued to resolve optimization problems.”
    • “The recent 'for science!' update has fixed a lot of bugs and optimized a great deal of the performance issues.”
    • “This is one of the worst optimized games ever created.”
    • “The performance is abysmal if you're being generous.”
    • “Performance is abysmal.”
  • graphics
    2,549 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Kerbal Space Program 2 delivers significantly improved graphics and sound design compared to its predecessor, offering more detailed environments, enhanced lighting, and immersive visual effects. However, these graphical enhancements come with high system requirements and often poor optimization, leading to frequent performance issues, stuttering, and crashes even on relatively powerful hardware. While the visuals are praised, many reviewers note that the gameplay is unfinished and buggy, with fewer features than the original and recommend playing the first KSP with mods for comparable or better graphics and a more stable experience.

    • “The graphics are a huge upgrade from KSP1 and parts are more cartoony.”
    • “Absolutely gorgeous graphics and sound improvements.”
    • “The textures, the clouds, the sun shining through the upper atmosphere in orbit - the game looks absolutely stellar and it's clear the developers have put a lot of love and care into the visuals.”
    • “Graphics are disappointing for a 2023 game and they don't even seem to have anti-aliasing working right.”
    • “The graphics are an upgrade from KSP1, but the performance is worse.”
    • “Even at highest graphics settings, the game still looks like ♥♥♥♥ and runs at very low FPS, making it practically unplayable on most systems.”
  • stability
    2,120 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Kerbal Space Program 2 is widely criticized for being extremely buggy and unstable, with frequent crashes, physics glitches, and save corruption making it nearly unplayable for many. Despite some improvements since launch, the game remains incomplete, poorly optimized, and lacks many features from its predecessor, compounded by the developer studio's closure and halted updates. Players generally recommend sticking with the original game or waiting until KSP2 is more polished and complete.

    • “The game, as far as I've played, isn't buggy; they fixed most of the bugs with the last update they did.”
    • “It took a year, but KSP 2 is finally entering the realm of "fun," "enjoyable" and "bug free enough to be playable." They're getting there, slowly but surely.”
    • “No glitches, no crashes, framerate is fine.”
    • “It crashes every time you open it, it is buggy, and your rocket will randomly explode.”
    • “The game is buggy and the development has stopped, still, they won't do any announcements and will leave this here to try to scam people into buying an early access that will never be completed.”
    • “Horribly buggy and crashes and corrupts all the time, not to mention it's physically impossible to play anything with the steep learning curve which on itself is not that big of a deal to get over I love learning but the fact that you can't keep a solid save going because after half an hour the saves corrupt is so annoying.”
  • story
    1,172 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story aspect in KSP 2 is divisive and currently underdeveloped, with many users lamenting its absence or minimal implementation compared to the original. While recent updates have introduced a mission-driven science mode and some narrative elements that provide structure and motivation, the game still lacks a cohesive campaign or engaging story arc. Persistent bugs and performance issues often hinder mission completion, detracting from the storytelling potential, although some players find the new missions and story progression a positive step forward.

    • “Already I feel the 'for science' missions have given a much better refined experience than the career or science modes in KSP 1; building lore/almost a storyline element to them, which I am invested in.”
    • “The missions are really fun and the world is beautiful.”
    • “The game leads you through the initial easy experiments with a few easy missions, lets you unlock new parts and prepares you for tougher, more demanding launches, rockets and missions.”
    • “The story of this game makes me beyond miserable.”
    • “But they abandoned it like a broken space station and left us drifting in the sea of darkness without any hope to complete our mission again.”
    • “This game is a buggy mess with frequent mission ending glitches.”
  • gameplay
    1,109 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Kerbal Space Program 2's gameplay retains the core mechanics of its predecessor but suffers from numerous bugs, missing features, and poor optimization, making it often frustrating and unstable. While the recent "for science" update improved performance and added some gameplay progression, many promised elements such as career mode, re-entry heating, and advanced mechanics remain absent or broken, hindering the overall experience. Fans of the original game are generally advised to stick with KSP 1 for a more polished and content-rich gameplay experience until KSP 2 is further developed.

    • “With enhanced graphics, new gameplay mechanics, and a more accessible yet still intricate approach to rocket science, KSP 2 offers both veterans and newcomers a fresh opportunity to explore the cosmos.”
    • “The simulation of orbital mechanics remains impressively accurate, demanding precise maneuvers for launches, transfers, and landings.”
    • “The tutorials continue to be excellent, and the new missions and tech tree give character and direction to the gameplay.”
    • “Game glitchy like fuel tank parts being uneven and in the wrong places; rocket acting really strange sometimes like curling around or parts flying out of control; rocket going out of control even with a good stabilizer; sometimes the parachute doesn't even deploy; and overall just slow and boring gameplay. Do not buy this, it's a scam.”
    • “Unstable, buggy, lots of crashes, abandoned by the developers and complete lack of gameplay features as promised.”
    • “KSP2's core gameplay loop is far too incomplete - building and flying being the only thing you can do, without any sort of goal that you don't set yourself - and even worse, it's extremely buggy and unoptimized.”
  • atmosphere
    348 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's atmosphere offers stunning visuals, dynamic music, and improved planetary details creating an immersive and captivating experience. However, many fundamental atmospheric features like realistic aerodynamic drag, heating effects during re-entry, and accurate physics are missing or buggy, resulting in inconsistent and sometimes broken gameplay. Performance issues also frequently arise within atmospheric flight, detracting from the otherwise promising atmospheric immersion.

    • “The few points that represented genuine improvement were the music - the soundtrack, on top of being fitting and well-composed, is fully dynamic and adjusts according to whether you're counting down, launching, performing atmospheric flight, or maneuvering in vacuum - and the visuals, to the extent they were completed.”
    • “I have fond memories of struggling to launch my first pod into orbit, and then being blown away as the sun rose over Kerbin's distant horizon, refracting through the atmosphere and casting long shadows over the mountains far below, all while the music swelled in grandeur.”
    • “The textures, the clouds, the sun shining through the upper atmosphere in orbit - the game looks absolutely stellar and it's clear the developers have put a lot of love and care into the visuals.”
    • “Default re-entry heating is very low; parts almost never break off during launch, even when flipping in mid-atmosphere.”
    • “Physics break sending vehicles flying; atmosphere will just not work on reentry vehicles so there is no way to slow down, kerbals on EVA will not be able to get into command capsules.”
    • “Return flight back into the atmosphere produces no flame effects, nor does it matter the angle you return at.”
  • music
    329 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in KSP2 is widely praised for its dynamic, context-sensitive soundtrack that adapts to gameplay moments such as launch, atmospheric flight, and planetary approaches, greatly enhancing immersion and atmosphere. Many note it as a significant improvement over the original game, with unique themes for different celestial bodies and high-quality sound design praised as a highlight of the experience. However, a few users mention some repetitiveness or preference for the original soundtrack, but overall the music is considered a standout feature that elevates the game's emotional and cinematic impact.

    • “The few points that represented genuine improvement were the music - the soundtrack, on top of being fitting and well-composed, is fully dynamic and adjusts according to whether you're counting down, launching, performing atmospheric flight, or maneuvering in vacuum.”
    • “The dynamic music is astoundingly integral to creating a rich ambiance.”
    • “The musical themes for each planet are unique and their subtle, or sometimes not so subtle, changes make things even more emotional, cinematic, and impactful.”
    • “The janky music and countdown before launch just makes it a joke; the editor has all the same parts but is harder to use for no benefit, removed complex mechanics like aerodynamics and control surfaces, performs worse and doesn't look much better than KSP1.”
    • “After about 8 hours, I had to turn off the music - there is no variety or distinct soundtrack; the music drones on the mind.”
    • “The sound design is good, except for the part where they removed the KSP1 theme song, and when the music just gets stuck on a loop.”
  • monetization
    327 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization of this game is overwhelmingly criticized as a blatant cash grab, with numerous players condemning its full-price sale despite being an unfinished, bug-ridden, and abandoned early access title. Many reviewers express frustration over deceptive advertising, lack of promised content, fired development teams, and ongoing sales without updates or support, leading to calls for refunds and delisting. Overall, it is seen as a greedy exploitation of the original game's goodwill, prioritizing profit over quality or completion.

    • “A cash grab disguised as early access; instead of delivering on its potential, the developers have seemingly abandoned it while still selling it at full price under the guise of 'early access.' This is a blatant cash grab, leaving players with a half-finished product and little hope for future updates.”
    • “I cannot believe they are still charging £45 for this abandoned unfinished 'game.' This had so much potential but just turned out to be an early access cash grab.”
    • “In no way is this game worth anywhere near $50. The state it is in feels like an internal testing state, asking $50 for this unstable game is absolutely absurd, even by today's standards. This is an absolute cash grab dragging the reputation of the original game through the dirt.”
  • humor
    143 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is described as a mix of charming, light-hearted, and occasionally dad-joke style comedy, especially appealing in tutorials and character animations, which adds to its educational and entertaining value. However, many users find that excessive focus on overt, "goofy" humor sometimes undermines the game's deeper mechanics and seriousness, with some feeling the humor becomes hollow or forced. Additionally, bugs and glitches—initially funny—often shift from being amusing to frustrating, with some players noting that the game's humor cannot fully mask its rough technical state.

    • “It was fun, it was challenging, it was educational, and it was hilarious.”
    • “Guiding the endearingly inept kerbals through the galactic playground feels like trying to teach a fish to ride a bicycle, resulting in hilariously disastrous launches.”
    • “The funny names and descriptions are seeded all through the game and they always motivate at least a chuckle.”
  • replayability
    90 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Replayability in this game is currently limited due to numerous bugs, missing features, and performance issues, especially compared to its predecessor. However, recent updates—particularly the "science" update—have significantly improved playability and added meaningful progression, making it more engaging for dedicated space exploration enthusiasts. Many reviewers recommend waiting for further patches before investing, though some mods and updates have enhanced the game's stability and replay value somewhat.

    • “The amount of content in the game has washed away any concerns I had about replayability and I've personally found the learning curve challenging enough to make the game addictive.”
    • “It ain't perfect (it's early access after all), but 11 months after launch it's finally both playable and replayable.”
    • “This game has a lot of replayability now and also has some great tutorials to help get you started.”
    • “Lack of replayability.”
    • “Not super replayable unless mods get added on to save this game.”
    • “Very limited replayability.”
  • grinding
    72 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Grinding in the game is widely described as excessively tedious and frustrating, with many players feeling that the repetitive tasks and broken mechanics overshadow the original appeal. While some appreciate certain aspects of the grind as skill-building, the overall consensus highlights a burdensome, cash-grab experience that diminishes enjoyment, especially for new players.

    • “The once-satisfying challenge of engineering space missions has been turned into a tedious exercise in fighting against the broken mechanics of a game that’s forgotten what made it special.”
    • “The UI is awful, building in the VAB was tedious in KSP, in KSP2 it's nearly impossible, and this was constructing the most basic of rockets to get to the Mun; I can't imagine building something with 100+ parts.”
    • “Editing part values is extremely clunky, causing the whole game to freeze for several seconds every time you right click a part in the editor, and the fact that setting control surfaces for specific uses requires enabling advanced controls for each one makes building a large aircraft very tedious.”
  • emotional
    68 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional response to this game is overwhelmingly one of heartbreak and disappointment, fueled by unmet expectations and perceived abandonment by the developers. Fans who were deeply attached to the original experience express sorrow over the sequel's state, lamenting broken promises, lack of updates, and a feeling of betrayal. While there are moments of beauty and nostalgia, the overall sentiment is that the game failed to deliver the emotional impact and fulfillment anticipated.

    • “Kerbal Space Program is one of the best games ever made, and when I saw the cinematic trailer for KSP2, an homage to the build-fly-dream trailer, exemplifying everything to love about the creativity of the community and the drive the game inspires us with, I cried incredibly hard for everything it meant to me.”
    • “The musical themes for each planet are unique and their subtle, or sometimes not so subtle, changes make things even more emotional, cinematic, and impactful.”
    • “It's heartbreaking, but please don't buy abandonware, no matter how highly you think of the first Kerbal Space Program.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Kerbal Space Program 2

9h Median play time
218h Average play time
3-100h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 184 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Kerbal Space Program 2

Games Like Kerbal Space Program 2

Space Engineers 2 Image
Games like Space Engineers 2
Medieval Engineers Image
Games like Medieval Engineers
Osiris: New Dawn Image
Games like Osiris: New Dawn
Kinetic Void Image
Games like Kinetic Void
Take On Mars Image
Games like Take On Mars
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Kerbal Space Program 2 is a open world simulation game with science fiction theme.

Kerbal Space Program 2 is available on Xbox Series X|S, PC, PlayStation 5, PlayStation 4 and others.

On average players spend around 218 hours playing Kerbal Space Program 2.

Kerbal Space Program 2 was released on February 24, 2023.

Kerbal Space Program 2 was developed by Intercept Games.

Kerbal Space Program 2 has received negative reviews from players. Most players liked Kerbal Space Program 2 for its graphics but disliked it for its optimization.

Kerbal Space Program 2 is a single player game with multiplayer support.

Similar games include Space Engineers 2, Medieval Engineers, Osiris: New Dawn, Kinetic Void, Take On Mars and others.