Karos Returns

About

Karos Returns is a multiplayer role playing game. It was developed by Galaxy Gate and was released on July 30, 2015. It received neutral reviews from players.

After a tenuous peace between the four races of Broccion, the world is at war again, seeking leadership. Players take up arms for their guild and for their nation to battle for land, resources, and victory. Choose from four races (Human, Shadow, Seroine, and Vaneese Human) and seven classes (Mystic, Bow Mistress, Blader, Paladin, Rogue, Sorceress, and Gunner), then gain experience to grow into an …

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

40%

Audience ScoreBased on 90 reviews

grinding3 negative mentions

Easy to get into with a large open world and various pets, mounts, and daily quests.
Unique PvP features and fun battle system with automation options to reduce grinding.
Nostalgic appeal and enjoyable for fans of older MMORPGs with accommodating controls.

Game is no longer available or supported; servers frequently unreachable and often down.
Outdated graphics, clunky controls, gender- and race-locked classes, and repetitive gameplay.
Poor optimization with bugs, crashes, language barriers in community, messy interface, and heavy presence of bots and hackers.

graphics
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
58%
21%
The graphics are widely criticized as outdated, low-poly, and resembling early-2000s MMO visuals, with poor character models and animations. Many users find the overall visual quality, UI, and text readability to be subpar, lacking the polish expected from modern games. While some acknowledge the nostalgic charm, most agree the graphics urgently need significant improvement.
- “- Next-gen graphics (far surpasses Xbox One and PS4).”
- “The graphics are next-gen.”
- “So-so graphics but nothing great.”
- “Graphics belong to the previous century (environment, character design, animation, even the text is hard to read).”
- “Graphic quality looks like crap, the UI is terribly made, animations are really poor.”
- “The graphics look like WoW when it first came out (2004), and lag is so bad I'm lucky if I get 30 frames.”
story
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
40%
30%
The story is widely criticized for being shallow and largely consisting of repetitive kill and fetch quests, with little to no player choice or meaningful narrative engagement. Many users feel the game lacks depth and originality in its storytelling, making it feel like a typical MMO with minimal story value.
- “It might have huge content and a deep story.”
- “A typical MMO with a typical fetch quest system.”
- “No freedom of choice when coming to quest standpoints.”
- “1-0 button masher, crappy graphics, no story at all (just kill and fetch quests).”
- “1: quests are piled up upon you without reason.”
- “2: no freedom of choice when coming to quest standpoints.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game features a grind-heavy leveling system, with some players appreciating that bots assist with leveling, making it less tedious for those who dislike grinding, while others feel the grind could be more rewarding to enhance player bonding. It is a repetitive, click-to-move MMO with a unique PvP and weapon system, but some negative reviews stem from veteran players trying to maintain dominance, which may discourage new players.
- “If you hate grinding, this game's for you; if you love grinding, maybe not. Although I feel the game might be better if you had to work for your levels to create more of a bonding experience.”
- “All in all, it's a click-to-move, repetitive quest, grindy MMO.”
- “The bot system helps you level, which reduces grinding, but some players feel it takes away from the challenge and sense of achievement.”
gameplay
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The gameplay is smooth overall, but the movement mechanics feel outdated, resembling styles from around 20 years ago.
- “Gameplay is smooth.”
- “Movement is okay, but the mechanics feel totally outdated, like they are about 20 years behind.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users criticize the monetization as relying on cheap, gimmicky tactics aimed at generating quick revenue, viewing it as an exploitative attempt to profit from a declining player base.
- “The only differences that I can see are a handful of gimmicks to skew their active player numbers, and cheap monetization tricks designed to bring in a quick buck, or more accurately, milk a dying cow.”
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users criticize the character development for its outdated graphics and poor animation, which hinder the overall experience and readability, negatively impacting immersion.
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users find the music to be acceptable but not particularly memorable or outstanding.