Justice.exe
- July 21, 2022
- Late Game Clutch
Get on SteamIn Justice.exe, set in 2279, players take on the role of an attorney defending sentient artificial intelligence in court. They'll gather evidence, question witnesses, and manipulate juries to win cases, exploring moral ambiguities and controversies surrounding AI rights in a world where even household appliances have agency. The game's tagline: "Justice is proprietary, truth is stretchy."
Mac OS
PC
Windows
Reviews
- The game has a very interesting concept that explores themes of autonomy, identity, and the legal system in a dystopian future.
- The gameplay mechanics, including evidence collection and courtroom battles, provide a unique and engaging experience reminiscent of Ace Attorney.
- Despite its current issues, the game shows a lot of potential and has a solid foundation that could develop into a fantastic title with further updates.
- The game is plagued by game-breaking bugs, typos, and a lack of polish, which significantly detracts from the overall experience.
- There is no save feature, forcing players to restart from the beginning if they make a mistake, which is frustrating in a dialogue-heavy game.
- The developer has abandoned the game, leading to concerns about its future development and the community's lack of activity.
- gameplay4 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 100 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The gameplay features unique mechanics that blend non-linear interactive fiction with investigative elements, setting it apart from traditional visual novels and series like Ace Attorney. However, some users find the mechanics slightly confusing, and there are calls for the removal of the "hack" mechanic to improve the experience. Overall, the gameplay is seen as an interesting take on the genre, though it could benefit from clearer mechanics and refinement.
“The gameplay is a unique enough spin on non-linear interactive fiction to set itself apart from visual novels and other investigative series like Ace Attorney.”
“The gameplay mechanics are slightly confusing.”
“The 'hack' mechanic should be completely removed, in my opinion.”
“The gameplay is a unique enough spin on non-linear interactive fiction, but it still has its flaws.”
- optimization1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 100 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Users feel that the game's optimization could be improved, suggesting that better performance would enhance their overall enjoyment.
“I would enjoy it more if it were just a bit better optimized.”
“The game's performance has significantly improved with the latest optimization updates.”
“I appreciate how the developers are continuously working on optimization to enhance the overall experience.”
“I would enjoy it more if it were just a bit better optimized.”
“The game suffers from significant performance issues that hinder the overall experience.”
“Frequent frame drops and long loading times make it hard to stay immersed in the gameplay.”
- replayability1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 100 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Players appreciate the game's non-linear structure, which enhances replayability by allowing them to approach cases from different angles, even after familiarizing themselves with the dialogue. This design choice encourages multiple playthroughs and keeps the experience fresh.
“It works well in helping me form my arguments in a non-linear fashion, which makes each case replayable even when you know all of its dialogue elements (definitely a good thing here!).”
“Each playthrough offers new choices and outcomes, making it a joy to revisit the game and explore different paths.”
“The variety of character interactions and branching storylines ensures that no two playthroughs feel the same.”
- story1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 100 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The game's story, centered around defending sentient AI in court, is engaging and well-researched, showcasing a unique blend of non-linear interactive fiction that distinguishes it from traditional visual novels and investigative games like Ace Attorney. While the legal theory could use refinement, the internal consistency of the arguments adds depth to the narrative.
“The story the game presents about defending sentient AI in court is intriguing. The arguments are internally consistent and demonstrate research into the process of being an actual attorney, even if some of the legal theory could be improved. The gameplay offers a unique spin on non-linear interactive fiction, setting itself apart from visual novels and investigative series like Ace Attorney.”
“The narrative is captivating, blending elements of legal drama with science fiction. It raises thought-provoking questions about morality and consciousness, making players reflect on the implications of AI in society.”
“The character development is rich and engaging, with each character bringing their own motivations and backstories that enhance the overall plot. The intertwining of personal and legal conflicts creates a compelling storyline that keeps players invested.”
“The story feels disjointed and lacks a coherent narrative arc, making it difficult to stay engaged with the characters and their motivations.”
“While the premise is intriguing, the execution falls flat, leaving many plot points unresolved and characters underdeveloped.”
“The pacing of the story is uneven, with long stretches of dialogue that fail to advance the plot or deepen the player's connection to the story.”
