Iron Marines Invasion

About

"Iron Marines: Invasion" is a real-time strategy game set in deep space, where players must command Federation troops across various worlds to defend against alien invasions. The game features unique stage missions, special operations, and a variety of heroes and units with unique fighting skills to employ in battles against formidable enemies. Prepare to defend the galaxy's peace and uncover an exceptional story full of challenges.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

71%

Audience ScoreBased on 111 reviews

story7 positive mentions

grinding4 negative mentions

The game offers hours of fun with engaging gameplay and a charming art style.
It features a variety of units and factions, allowing for diverse strategies and replayability.
The mechanics are simplified compared to the first game, making it easier to play and more accessible.

The game suffers from numerous bugs and control issues, making unit management frustrating.
Many missions feel repetitive and lack the depth and balance of the original game.
Hero abilities are limited, and leveling them up is slow, leading to a less engaging experience.

story
55 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
78%
9%
The story in the game has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it less engaging and more disjointed compared to its predecessor. Many criticized the missions for being repetitive and grindy, lacking compelling narratives and interesting map designs, while others appreciated the diversity of heroes and factions. Overall, the game's structure and mission design seem to detract from the storytelling experience, leading to frustration among players.
- “Even though it is linear, the story is nice, and the heroes and races that can be played are diverse.”
- “This game greatly improves many aspects from its predecessor, adding endless side quests as you explore the galaxy to be able to farm resources and adding many different factions for the player to select, adapting their team to each mission or to their own playstyle by combining the factions.”
- “Personally, I like the way the storyline is presented in an old-school comic book format too.”
- “I went through the first game 2 or 3 times, but here, I gave up on the fourth mission. It doesn’t drag on, you don’t feel the plot, the design of the maps is weak, and the missions are not interesting. In general, it looks like they released the game in a hurry because there were developments.”
- “The missions don't feel nearly as well balanced or compelling.”
- “The missions were boring and repetitive.”
graphics
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
13%
20%
The graphics are characterized by a charming, cartoony art style that is a hallmark of Ironhide, with vibrant animations and great artwork that enhance the overall experience. While the visuals are generally praised as superb and polished, some users noted that the music does not significantly contribute to immersion, and gameplay may not be as dynamic as previous titles in the Kingdom Rush series. Overall, the graphics are lightweight yet pleasant, appealing to fans of the developer's aesthetic.
- “From the superb graphics to the challenging gameplay, it is a polished and entertaining product as video games should be.”
- “Great artwork, and the music is so good.”
- “The game has graphics with the charming style that is already characteristic of Ironhide, but the music is not very impressive and does not contribute to the immersion in the scenes. The gameplay itself is not as fun and dynamic as the games in the Kingdom Rush series.”
- “For people that are experiencing issues with graphics, set the resolution to the right one for you.”
- “The art style and animation are vibrant as always - Ironhide's greatest strength lies in this.”
gameplay
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
10%
30%
The gameplay is notably easier and more simplified compared to the first game, which some players appreciate, but many feel it lacks depth, particularly in unit deployment choices. While the charming graphics and lively characters add some enjoyment, the overall experience is considered less dynamic and engaging than previous titles in the Kingdom Rush series, with spec ops missions receiving criticism for their lack of effort.
- “Lot easier to play compared to the first game; the mechanics are even more simplified, which I like.”
- “The characters feel very alive and add a bit of humor to the gameplay to keep it spiced up.”
- “Nice gameplay!”
- “There's not much depth to choosing which units to deploy; you kind of just deploy the highest cost ones and occasionally swap them on the spot, which makes the choices seem pointless.”
- “Gameplay is not the best either; spec ops missions are a joke. They put a lot more effort into these in the first game.”
- “The gameplay lacks variety and depth, making it feel repetitive and uninspired.”
music
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
57%
43%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with some praising its quality and charm, while others find it repetitive and lacking in immersion, particularly during key gameplay moments like boss fights. Overall, it appears that while the soundtrack has potential, it does not consistently enhance the gaming experience as effectively as in previous titles from the series.
- “The soundtracks for these games have always been great, but I'd like to note that they seem to have been taking it up a notch in the past few games.”
- “Great artwork, and the music is so good.”
- “The game has graphics with the charming style that is already characteristic of Ironhide, but the music is not very impressive and does not contribute to the immersion in the scenes. The gameplay itself is not as fun and dynamic as the games in the Kingdom Rush series.”
- “Another disappointing aspect is the music; it's just boring because you hear the same thing over and over again for the entire game. The music doesn't really change, and when you fight a boss, you have the same calm music as at the start of the stage.”
- “The music is not very impressive and does not contribute to the immersion in the scenes. The gameplay itself is not as fun and dynamic as the games in the Kingdom Rush series.”
grinding
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious, as missions quickly become repetitive and require completing bonus missions that feel like rehashed content. Many users suggest that focusing on the campaign rather than randomized spec ops missions improves the overall experience, as leveling up heroes through grinding can be frustrating.
- “Missions get really grindy fast, and to get a couple of heroes high enough level to participate, you end up doing bonus missions that are careless rehashes of the missions you already played.”
- “I initially had an issue with leveling up heroes because I was going about it through grinding the randomized spec ops missions, which I believe they made worse from the previous game; however, I found just sticking to the campaign made the game more enjoyable.”
replayability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
25%
25%
Users express mixed feelings about replayability, with some appreciating the variety offered by different troop and tower combinations, while others criticize the shift towards randomized game loops in recent titles. Overall, the potential for replay value is acknowledged, but concerns about the direction of game design persist.
- “Tons of replay value trying out different troop/tower combos.”
- “I dislike the route Ironhide is taking with 'replayable' or randomized game loops, starting with Legends of Kingdom Rush and now the Spec Ops missions in this game.”
stability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, with numerous bugs and glitches reported, particularly affecting unit commands. This has led to a frustrating experience for players.
- “It is buggy to all hell.”
- “Many glitches, massive problem commanding units.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers appreciate the humor in the game, noting that the lively characters contribute significantly to the comedic elements, enhancing the overall gameplay experience. The enthusiasm for more funny games indicates a strong positive reception of the humor aspect.
- “The characters feel very alive and add a bit of humor to the gameplay to keep it spiced up.”
- “I wish you all the best and keep doing all of these funny games that we love so much!!”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant optimization issues, particularly related to its user interface, performance—especially on the map screen—and control responsiveness.
- “It has UI, performance (especially on the map screen), and control issues.”
- “It has UI, performance (especially on the map screen), and control issues.”