Idle Monster TD: Evolved

About

An endless Tower Defense game of epic Monsters vs evil Humans. Unlock, upgrade, and evolve over 100 unique Monsters to defend your home from an infinite swarm of increasingly difficult enemies. Strategize the most effective placement of Monsters to optimize their powerful abilities.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

78%

Audience ScoreBased on 859 reviews

gameplay23 positive mentions

monetization18 negative mentions

The game offers a fun mix of tower defense and idle mechanics, making it enjoyable for casual play.
There is a lot of content and variety in gameplay, with numerous upgrades and strategies to explore.
The game is free to play and allows for decent progression without mandatory purchases, making it accessible for all players.

The game suffers from aggressive monetization tactics, with many features locked behind paywalls, making it feel pay-to-win.
Progression can be slow and tedious, especially without spending money, leading to a grindy experience.
Key features, such as tournaments and certain upgrades, have been disabled or are not functioning, diminishing the overall gameplay experience.

gameplay
58 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
50%
10%
The gameplay of this tower defense idler is noted for its variety and addictive nature, combining engaging mechanics with a satisfying progression system. While many players appreciate the blend of idle and active gameplay, some criticize the repetitive enemy behavior and the slow pace, alongside concerns about predatory monetization practices. Overall, it offers a solid experience for fans of the genre, though it may not stand out in terms of unique mechanics.
- “The variety of gameplay makes this idler stand out from the crowd.”
- “It's a well thought out tower defense, with lots of fun elements and mechanics.”
- “It's got the bones of a good tower defense game, the muscles of solid cyclic gameplay, the skin of a reliable time waster, and the personality of an old friend you're excited to spend the day with.”
- “The roadmap the new development team has released seems questionable as well with no hints of actual improvements for endgame players when it comes to increasing your resources and leveling up your towers.”
- “In the time I played, enemy units do nothing but run from start to finish, with no gameplay differences between them beyond health and movement speed.”
- “Gameplay is repetitive like that of a mobile game of its kind with only about 5 stages.”
monetization
46 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
7%
54%
39%
The monetization in this game has been widely criticized for being predatory and excessively aggressive, with many players labeling it a cash grab that heavily promotes pay-to-win mechanics. In-app purchases are deemed overpriced, and while some players find free-to-play options available, the overall sentiment suggests that the game is designed to exploit impulsive spending. Many reviewers recommend avoiding the game unless one is comfortable with its monetization tactics, as they significantly hinder the gameplay experience.
- “Fun free-to-play idle game, but in-game purchases are expensive.”
- “The microtransactions do allow for faster progression, but that is not to say there aren't free-to-play options that do the same as well.”
- “There are microtransactions, but so far I have not felt the need.”
- “Tldr: this game has highly predatory monetization tactics and should not be played by those vulnerable to such things.”
- “The game will flood you with so many bad deals and ads for money purchases to an absurd extent with no way to remove them.”
- “This game is a disgusting cash grab that moves at a snail's pace, literally goading you every few minutes to spend your money.”
grinding
32 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
97%
The reviews indicate that the game is highly grindy, with many players enjoying the long-term grind but also expressing frustration over its excessive nature and reliance on microtransactions. While some appreciate the strategic elements and the ability to leave the game running in the background, others criticize the slow progress and pay-to-win aspects, suggesting that the grind can become tedious and overwhelming. Overall, the grinding aspect is a double-edged sword, offering both enjoyment and frustration depending on the player's perspective.
- “Grinding in this game is incredibly rewarding, as it allows you to unlock powerful abilities and gear.”
- “The grind is satisfying, with each level-up feeling like a significant achievement.”
- “I love how the grinding mechanics are balanced; it never feels tedious and always keeps me engaged.”
- “Becomes far too grindy, far too quickly.”
- “The game is extremely tedious after 1-2 hours into a prestige. Everything should be cheap, but I can buy only two upgrades with all of my prestige points. The game should give you lots of points to explore things and make it interesting as you go on, but this game has none of that.”
- “I hate how it's pay to win; there is no way to speed up the game without grinding a bunch or spending money. It has way too many microtransactions; there are better ways to make money off of a free-to-play game.”
graphics
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
35%
50%
15%
The graphics in the game receive mixed reviews, with many praising the cute, colorful visuals and the distinct upgrades that enhance both gameplay and appearance. However, some users criticize the 3D graphics as unattractive and uninspired, noting that the game feels like a rehash of its predecessor with only superficial graphical changes. Overall, while the graphics are generally considered appealing for a mobile game, performance issues on devices are also highlighted.
- “Each new upgrade not only increases a unit's statistics but changes it graphically as well, so we can actually see a difference over time.”
- “The graphics are cute and colorful, while the sprites are relatively large, which ensures both children and adults should enjoy playing the game.”
- “Fast-paced, play to win, nice graphics, what more could you need in a tower defense game?”
- “Also, it makes my mobile phone turn into a hot brick if I play it on mobile, even with the graphics/battery settings set.”
- “This may seem like a new game, but it is actually a copy-and-paste of its previous game from two years ago but with different graphics.”
- “Progress is basically rolled back, except for the beta testers, and there has been almost no new development in terms of code, just fancier graphics even though they look terrible compared to the old one.”
story
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
75%
19%
The game's story is minimal, primarily consisting of a brief tutorial mentioning humans attacking monsters, with no significant narrative development throughout gameplay. Players focus more on completing daily missions to earn gems for upgrades, rather than engaging with a rich storyline. Overall, the emphasis is on gameplay mechanics and rewards rather than storytelling.
- “Moral of the story, you never know what life holds in store for you, and if I would have given up when all the odds were stacked against me, I wouldn't be where I am today.”
- “There is no story, other than a snippet in the tutorial about humans attacking monsters.”
- “☐ no story”
- “---{ story }---”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The music in the game is described as a pleasant and relaxing soundtrack that enhances the overall experience, though opinions are mixed, with some users expressing dissatisfaction. While many appreciate its calming qualities, others find it less appealing. Overall, the soundtrack contributes positively to the game's atmosphere.
- “It features a nice, relaxing, and rather jolly soundtrack, too.”
- “Good scaling, progression, music, and GUI.”
- “I relaxed for 5 minutes to this music long enough to realize that I was going to be okay.”
- “Plus, I hate the music in this.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the humor in the game's absurdly overpriced items and the irony of its pay-to-win mechanics, particularly in tournaments where fairness is claimed but not delivered. The juxtaposition of the developers' assurances of fairness with the reality of monetization adds a comedic layer to the experience.
- “Also, your items are hilariously overpriced.”
- “P2W but funny.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
100%
The game offers some replayability, but many users feel it lacks sufficient incentives to encourage repeated play, especially when compared to its predecessor, Precursor. Overall, the current model does not provide compelling reasons for players to invest time or money into the game.
- “The game offers a variety of choices that make each playthrough feel unique and engaging.”
- “The different paths and outcomes encourage players to return and explore new strategies.”
- “The model you currently have set up presents no reason to spend money on the game, as there is little playability, replayability, or incentive to progress.”
- “Precursor was more playable and seemed to lead to a better gaming experience, but they failed totally.”
- “It's got some replayability.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players find the game to be heartwarming and uplifting, often highlighting its ability to evoke positive emotions and create a sense of comfort and joy.
- “This game made me feel a whirlwind of emotions, from joy to sadness, and everything in between.”
- “The story touched my heart deeply, leaving a lasting impact long after I finished playing.”
- “I was genuinely moved by the characters' journeys; their struggles and triumphs felt so real.”
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Character development in the game is criticized for being heavily monetized, with significant advantages tied to spending money, overshadowing the otherwise appealing character designs. Players feel that the focus on financial investment detracts from meaningful growth and progression.