Skip to main content

HUBE: Seeker of Achievements

HUBE: Seeker of Achievements Game Cover
64%Game Brain Score
atmosphere, humor
gameplay, graphics
64% User Score Based on 111 reviews

Platforms

PCWindows
Buy Nowfrom €0.99
Buy NowGet on Steam €0.99
HUBE: Seeker of Achievements Game Cover

About

HUBE: Seeker of Achievements is a single player casual action adventure game. It was developed by AFBIK Studio and was released on May 16, 2018. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Hube: Seeker of Achievements - is a hardcore-platformer game. Try to open all game levels, and collect all achievements.

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
HUBE: Seeker of Achievements screenshot
Skip User Reviews

64%
Audience ScoreBased on 111 reviews
atmosphere1 positive mentions
graphics3 negative mentions
  • Offers an extremely large number of achievements (around 5000) unlocked within minutes, ideal for achievement hunters.
  • Simple and accessible gameplay with easy platforming mechanics requiring minimal skill.
  • Very low time investment and low cost, making it a quick way to boost Steam profile achievements.
  • Gameplay is minimal, repetitive, with no real depth, challenge, story, or meaningful content beyond achievements.
  • Technical issues such as game crashes, freezes (notably on Steam Deck), lack of save/progress, no configurable controls or settings.
  • Poor graphics, sound design, level design with bugs and some impossible levels making the game frustrating or unplayable.
  • gameplay
    22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is minimalistic and simplistic, primarily focused on rapid achievement unlocking rather than skillful or engaging play, with short levels and no evolving mechanics. Many find it lacks depth, challenge, or meaningful content, feeling more like an achievement dump than a true platforming experience. However, there is a minority who consider it a decent platformer despite its emphasis on meta gaming and achievement spam.

    • “The gameplay itself is simple and approachable.”
    • “This is a decent platformer with fun gameplay.”
    • “No menu, no gameplay, just an instant achievement dump followed by a full freeze.”
    • “Its levels are short, its mechanics lack evolution, and replay value is tied entirely to achievement completion rather than gameplay depth or variety.”
    • “There are no power-ups, advanced moves, combat mechanics, or evolving systems—just running and jumping from point A to point B.”
  • graphics
    10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics are generally criticized as minimal, repetitive, and lacking style or effort, with sparse environments and low-quality visuals that fail to impress. Performance issues like low FPS and limited graphical options further detract from the experience. Overall, the graphics are seen as uninspired and poorly executed.

    • “On top of that, the graphics are cheap and minimal yet I am still getting low FPS with a slight delay in the character's movements.”
    • “The graphics here are some of the worst, laziest attempts at video game 'art' I've ever seen.”
    • “It's clear the developer didn't even try to produce any real graphics for the game and just phoned it in.”
  • story
    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game lacks a meaningful story, offering no direction or narrative depth. Its main focus is on achievements rather than storytelling, leading to a shallow and unengaging experience.

    • “What story?”
    • “The game itself isn't even fun, and feels like a cheaply made platformer game with no instructions, no story, and no direction nor goal - other than to open it and run it for the achievements.”
    • “No story.”
  • music
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music is widely criticized for being repetitive and unengaging, consisting mainly of short, looping ambient tracks that fail to add interest or depth to the game experience. Users find it boring and minimalistic, contributing little to the overall atmosphere.

    • “Boring platformer without a tutorial or explanation of controls and game mechanics, boring music, and boring and unappealing visuals.”
    • “The next thing I realized was that the 'music' is a 4 or so second loop of a probably 3 chord progression.”
    • “The whole soundtrack consists of some looped ambient music, and I would not really have added the full name of the composer.”
  • grinding
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Grinding in the game is notably time-consuming and demanding, often requiring significant effort, persistence, and potentially even external tools like macros. However, players who enjoy thorough completion will find the grind rewarding and satisfying.

    • “You'll need a second life, maybe some macros, and a strong will to live for grinding.”
    • “But hey, if you love grinding for that sweet 100% completion, this is your nirvana.”
    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
  • replayability
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game offers limited replayability due to short levels, lack of evolving mechanics, and absence of challenge or depth, with replay value relying solely on achievement hunting rather than engaging gameplay variety.

    • “No challenge, no depth, no replay value.”
    • “Its levels are short, its mechanics lack evolution, and replay value is tied entirely to achievement completion rather than gameplay depth or variety.”
  • atmosphere
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere is minimal and functional, prioritizing simplicity and ease of play over immersive or thematic depth, making it suitable for quick, casual sessions.

  • monetization
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization of games made with Gamemaker Studio is often criticized for focusing on retro pixel shovelware and cash grabs, indicating a tendency toward low-quality, profit-driven titles.

  • humor
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's humor is noted as extremely funny, particularly in its description, though some users feel it reflects the work of a single creator who may not be a professional in comedy.

Skip Game Offers

Buy HUBE: Seeker of Achievements

2h Median play time
2h Average play time
2-2h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 2 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like HUBE: Seeker of Achievements

Games Like HUBE: Seeker of Achievements

ORIX! Image
53%64reviews

ORIX!

2018Action
PCWindows
Games like ORIX!
WIN THE GAME: DO IT! Image
59%141reviews

WIN THE GAME: DO IT!

2018Action
PCWindows
Games like WIN THE GAME: DO IT!
Fenix Box Image

Fenix Box

2018Action
PCWindows
Games like Fenix Box
WIN THE GAME: WTF! Image
69%77reviews

WIN THE GAME: WTF!

2018Action
PCWindows
Games like WIN THE GAME: WTF!
Konrad the Rocket Image

Konrad the Rocket

2017Platformer
PCWindows
Games like Konrad the Rocket
More games like HUBE: Seeker of Achievements
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

HUBE: Seeker of Achievements is a casual action adventure game.

HUBE: Seeker of Achievements is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 2 hours playing HUBE: Seeker of Achievements.

HUBE: Seeker of Achievements was released on May 16, 2018.

HUBE: Seeker of Achievements was developed by AFBIK Studio.

HUBE: Seeker of Achievements has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked HUBE: Seeker of Achievements for its atmosphere but disliked it for its gameplay.

HUBE: Seeker of Achievements is a single player game.

Similar games include ORIX!, WIN THE GAME: DO IT!, Fenix Box, WIN THE GAME: WTF!, Konrad the Rocket and others.