"HOARD is a historical shooter game where you play as a dragon on a mission to build the biggest pile of gold. The game features 4 game modes, over 35 unique kingdoms, and supports 1-4 players. In HOARD, you'll need to strategize and make decisions about how to interact with the kingdom around you to increase your treasure and become the ultimate dragon."
Fun and addictive gameplay that allows players to experience being a dragon, burning villages and collecting gold.
Simple mechanics make it easy to pick up and play, with various game modes that add replayability.
Best enjoyed with friends in multiplayer mode, creating a competitive and chaotic atmosphere.
Repetitive gameplay can lead to boredom, especially in single-player mode without a compelling story or progression.
Controls can be clunky and unresponsive, particularly when using a mouse and keyboard.
Lack of local co-op and a dwindling online multiplayer community limits the game's longevity.
gameplay
166 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
31%
61%
8%
The gameplay of Hoard is characterized by its simplicity and accessibility, allowing players to quickly grasp the mechanics while offering some strategic depth. However, many reviews highlight its repetitive nature and lack of emergent gameplay, with some players finding the controls frustrating and the tutorials insufficient. Despite these criticisms, the game is praised for its fun, fast-paced action and unique premise, making it a suitable choice for casual gaming sessions.
“Hoard is an indie-made action game possessing fast, fluid gameplay and simple yet involving strategy elements.”
“Whether you're a hardcore gamer or a casual player, Hoard's fast-paced, sometimes frantic gameplay will keep you on your claws as you solo, compete against other dragons, or work together to collect gold medals in every map and gameplay type.”
“The gameplay is like nothing you will ever see, and after playing... you won't be the same person you were going in.”
“A frustrating game with frustrating control mechanics and tutorials that go on for too long... and still don't tell you the information you need.”
“Aside from the painful controls and boring repetitive gameplay, the graphics aren't completely terrible but don't really make good use of the capabilities of the PC platform.”
“Shallow and extremely repetitive gameplay.”
graphics
92 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
26%
61%
13%
The graphics of the game are generally described as charming and colorful, with a pleasing tabletop aesthetic that evokes nostalgia for childhood board games. While some users appreciate the clear and polished visuals, others note issues such as choppy performance, graphical bugs, and a lack of optimization that can detract from the experience. Overall, the graphics are considered adequate for the gameplay, though some players feel they could benefit from a remake or further refinement.
“The graphics, which have improved over the years, are good even if the sprites are still on the small side, while the music is enjoyable and fits the tone perfectly.”
“Although they don't seem particularly posh, the graphics are clear and polished and there is a fair amount of detail to them and each map to give you a good balance of visual interest and clear visual information.”
“It is very beautiful looking, I love the table-top aesthetic that is given to all of the boards.”
“Disliked: graphics begging for a remake (not a fan of the grainy style), starts to get frantic fast, wish there were a story campaign, rip devs.”
“Aside from the painful controls and boring repetitive gameplay, the graphics aren't completely terrible but don't really make good use of the capabilities of the PC platform.”
“Too bad it's optimized like crap because even with my 4GB VRAM I have to run this thing with the lower settings on considerably low resolution or else it either crashes on me or completely kills itself graphically with all kinds of visual glitches.”
story
70 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
11%
72%
17%
The game lacks a cohesive story or single-player campaign, which many players find disappointing, as it primarily consists of skirmishes without character development or a deeper narrative. While the premise of playing as a dragon hoarding treasure is engaging, the absence of a structured storyline or progression system leaves the gameplay feeling flat and repetitive. Overall, players express a desire for a more meaningful narrative to enhance their experience.
“The storyline is great; you are a dragon and you want all the gold, perfect.”
“Set in a medieval-style fantasy world, players take control of a dragon in their quest to burn, pillage, and plunder the biggest pile of treasure possible.”
“Fun arcade action - you're not a knight on a quest to kill the dragon and loot his den; you are the dragon!”
“Hoard is a good game, but it is held back by a lack of a single-player story campaign or any sense of progression.”
“There is potential for a much more interesting game, but lack of a proper story and strategic elements make the player lose interest quickly.”
“The only drawback is that it doesn't have a proper continuous single player campaign and the campaign mode itself is more like a collection of skirmishes strung together with no storyline.”
music
38 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
26%
42%
32%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with many players finding it repetitive and lacking variety, as there are only a few soundtracks available, and only one is considered good. While some appreciate the catchy and relaxing nature of the music, others express disappointment over changes made to the original tracks, suggesting that players should revert to the older music for a better experience. Overall, the music fits the game's tone but is seen as a weak point due to its limited selection and repetitive looping.
“The graphics, which have improved over the years, are good even if the sprites are still on the small side, while the music is enjoyable and fits the tone perfectly.”
“The art style is nice, the music is so catchy but also relaxing. I remember it after all this time, and the competitive PvP aspect is fun and addicting against others. The gameplay is unique, and I've never seen anything like it before; the game is just fun!”
“Really addictive and enjoyable music.”
“The music and format gets very repetitive.”
“Buggy, glitchy, laggy, annoying repetitive music that loops over every 2 minutes, lack of controller support, and mouse crosshairs don't work.”
“They changed the music at some point which I didn't like; luckily, there is a way to get the original tracks back in.”
replayability
28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
39%
11%
The game's replayability is a mixed bag, with some players praising its diverse modes, high score challenges, and achievement hunting that encourage repeated play, while others find it tedious and lacking in long-term engagement. Many reviews highlight the fun of competing for gold and the quick session lengths, but some note that multiplayer can enhance the experience, whereas solo play may become boring over time. Overall, the game offers significant replay value for those who enjoy skill-based challenges, but it may not sustain interest for all players.
“This is a pretty darn excellent arcade game with an insane amount of replay value to it and it's also insanely entertaining to play.”
“Individual sessions are quick, and replayability is provided in the form of several diverse modes, along with the heavy emphasis on high scores.”
“If you enjoy hunting for achievements, the single player will offer a lot of replayability as they are well designed to actually require some skill and practice to achieve and collect.”
“It's a top-down shooter that fails due to a lack of replayability.”
“An afternoon filler that is great to start and sadly hasn't got much replayability.”
“Replay value 6.5/10”
stability
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting significant bugs, glitches, and performance issues, particularly on the PC version, which is seen as less polished than its PS3 counterpart. Some users experienced freezing at the main menu, visual glitches, and lag, while others noted a lack of controller support and optimization problems. However, a few players reported no issues at all, indicating that experiences may vary widely.
“I hadn't played this game in years because it was extremely buggy and laggy.”
“Sadly, the PC version isn't as polished as the PS3 version was; it seems buggy in response to the controller, and the lack of local co-op is disappointing to say the least.”
“Too bad it's optimized poorly because even with my 4GB VRAM, I have to run this thing with lower settings at a considerably low resolution, or else it either crashes on me or completely kills itself graphically with all kinds of visual glitches.”
humor
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is widely praised for its humor, particularly in multiplayer mode, where players enjoy funny scenarios, such as an enemy dragon accidentally burning both the player and the princess. Reviewers highlight the entertaining and casual nature of the gameplay, making it a fun experience to share with friends. Overall, the humor adds a delightful layer to the game's simple appearance, enhancing its appeal.
“Although the game is simple in appearance, there are many funny moments nonetheless, like when an enemy dragon is so determined to get the princess you're carrying that he ends up burning you both!”
“A funny and entertaining game, particularly in multiplayer.”
“Hilariously good multiplayer fun.”
grinding
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The grinding aspect of the game is characterized by a focus on multiplayer and endgame achievements, which can feel tedious, especially when aiming for gold medals. While some players find enjoyment in the grind and appreciate the replayability, others note that the experience can become boring over time, particularly due to a lack of active players. Overall, it appeals to those who enjoy grind-heavy games and are looking for a casual experience.
“Grindy multiplayer and endgame achievements.”
“I eventually began to enjoy this mode, but going for the gold medal on the four levels was a bit tedious.”
“Although this game is a bit tedious, it has lots of replayability; sadly, hardly anyone is ever playing this because it will be boring later on.”
optimization
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
40%
40%
The game's optimization has received significant criticism, with users reporting severe performance issues, including crashes and visual glitches, even on lower settings. While some players found temporary fixes, such as forcing v-sync, the overall consensus is that the game is poorly optimized, detracting from the experience. A patch is anticipated to address these issues, but current performance remains a major concern.
“Performance 10.0/10”
“It's clear that the game isn't very well optimized for performance, sadly, but in my case it turned out the 'chugging' effect could be fixed by forcing v-sync on my graphics card manually, and now it runs smoothly (there is supposed to be a patch eventually to allow v-sync to be changed in the options).”
“Too bad it's optimized like crap because even with my 4GB VRAM I have to run this thing with the lower settings on considerably low resolution or else it either crashes on me or completely kills itself graphically with all kinds of visual glitches, but otherwise it's a pretty good game, especially online.”
“One minor problem is, it bites more than it should in the performance department.”
“Musica and bad optimization!”
atmosphere
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The atmosphere of the game is rated at 5.2/10, indicating a moderate level of effectiveness in enhancing the overall experience. While some elements contribute positively, there may be room for improvement to create a more immersive environment.
“It really improves the game's atmosphere.”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization of the game is criticized as a cash grab, with users noting it feels like a poorly executed port from the PS3 to Steam. Despite this, some players find the game experience addictive, suggesting that the monetization strategy may inadvertently enhance engagement.
“This is a sloppily ported PS3 game dumped onto Steam by greedy developers as a cash grab.”
“This is a sloppily ported PS3 game dumped onto Steam by greedy developers as a cash grab.”
character development
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Reviewers express a desire for deeper character development, suggesting that a more engaging storyline or a permanent upgrade system could enhance the significance of player achievements. The lack of meaningful character progression detracts from the overall experience.
“Perhaps a storyline, or character development, or some kind of permanent upgrade/unlock system would have given meaning to your victories.”