Global Ops: Commando Libya

About

"Global Ops: Commando Libya" is a first-person shooter game set in modern-day Libya. Players take on the role of a skilled commando tasked with stopping a rogue general and his army. The game features a variety of weapons, vehicles, and mission objectives, taking players through a variety of environments, from desert fortresses to underground facilities. Overall, it's a fast-paced and action-packed military shooter with a strong emphasis on tactical gameplay.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

44%

Audience ScoreBased on 187 reviews

gameplay12 positive mentions

story18 negative mentions

The game is entertaining in a 'so bad it's good' way, providing some laughs with its bad voice acting and dialogue.
It's a cheap option for those looking for a simple, mindless shooter experience.
Achievements are easy to unlock, making it appealing for completionists.

The controls are clunky and unresponsive, with no option to customize key bindings.
The AI is incredibly dumb, often failing to provide any challenge or assistance during gameplay.
The graphics and overall design feel outdated and lack polish, making the game visually unappealing.

story
85 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
66%
21%
The story of the game is widely criticized for being generic, clichéd, and poorly executed, often described as a shallow military narrative involving American soldiers combating vague threats like nuclear weapons and terrorists. Many players found the dialogue and voice acting to be subpar, contributing to an overall lack of engagement with the plot, which is often viewed as unintentionally humorous due to its absurdity. Despite some acknowledging a campy charm, the consensus is that the story fails to provide depth or meaningful character development, making it a significant drawback of the game.
- “The story is ridiculous, cliched B-movie cheesiness with dudebro protagonists Pope and West that swear a ton, which can be enjoyable if you appreciate camp or direct-to-DVD movies.”
- “The game fails to deliver good gameplay but it does succeed in being solid in its small story, having consistent and yet diverse gameplay and in being a quick time spender.”
- “In that regard, the plot is good for what it is, action comedy.”
- “On top of this, the story and voice acting are painfully generic.”
- “The lack of character development or narrative depth makes it hard to care about the missions or their outcomes.”
- “The story is ridiculous, cliched B-movie cheesiness with dudebro protagonists that swear a ton, which can be enjoyable if you appreciate camp or direct-to-DVD movies.”
graphics
39 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
18%
54%
28%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players describing them as outdated and mediocre, often comparing them to titles from 2007 or earlier. While some appreciate the environmental destruction features and find the visuals acceptable for a low-budget title, others criticize the bland and repetitive environments, lack of advanced graphic options, and overall poor quality that detracts from immersion. Overall, the consensus leans towards disappointment, particularly given the standards expected in 2012.
- “- graphics are extremely impressive, couple of times I had difficulty telling the difference between real life and this game.”
- “- detailed graphics: fight in realistic settings from Greenland to Libya!”
- “Graphically it ain't amazing but good enough for £2.40.”
- “The graphics are another weak point, which is almost inexcusable given the standards of 2012.”
- “The environments, supposedly set in Libya, are bland and repetitive, giving no sense of immersion or geographical authenticity.”
- “The graphics are terrible, controls are sluggish and unresponsive, and the voice acting is worse than Men of War... and that's saying a lot.”
gameplay
37 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
32%
59%
8%
The gameplay is largely criticized for being a generic and lackluster experience, heavily borrowing from other titles like Gears of War, with poorly implemented mechanics and uninteresting design. Players note that while it features typical cover shooting and vehicle combat, the execution is often flawed, leading to frustration rather than enjoyment. Overall, the game fails to deliver a compelling gameplay experience, with many reviewers describing it as mediocre at best.
- “The gameplay is a mix of cover shooting, rushing, and vehicle fights.”
- “There are many different places/settings which bring variety to the gameplay.”
- “The gameplay is solid, and it works.”
- “The gameplay is your typical Gears of War clone with chest-high walls and edgy dialogue like the player character saying 'throwing some shit' when he throws a hand grenade.”
- “'Global Ops: Commando Libya' is a prime example of how a game can fall short of even the most basic expectations in terms of gameplay, design, and overall experience.”
- “Bad AI, bad controls, bad design layout; gameplay is just nowhere near enjoyable.”
humor
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is characterized by its intentionally bad dialogue and voice acting, which many players find amusing, likening it to a parody of action films. While some appreciate the absurdity and vulgarity, others may not resonate with its comedic style, as it often borders on "so bad it's funny." Overall, the game's humor is a mix of hilariously poor execution and over-the-top character portrayals, making it a hit for those who enjoy a comedic take on gaming.
- “The best part of the game was the hilariously bad dialogue, so make sure not to skip over that.”
- “The voice acting is so stupid it's beyond hilarious :) Makes you feel like you're playing through a parody of Rambo or Commando lol.”
- “The game is not perfect and neither bad; it actually made me laugh a couple of times, especially when I saw the cutscenes and another time when my teammate ran away from me.”
stability
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The stability of the game is widely criticized, with users reporting numerous bugs, glitches, and clunky controls that significantly detract from the overall experience. Many players describe the game as "buggy" and "janky," leading to frustration and a lack of enjoyment. While some acknowledge minor issues, the consensus is that the game's stability is poor, resulting in a frustrating gameplay experience.
- “The 'cover' mechanism is buggy and broken.”
- “It's buggy, janky and just all around not fun.”
- “Terrible buggy clunky port of a crappy console shooter with low rating scores, why was this even done???”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The in-game music is set to a default loud volume, which some players find overwhelming, but it is complemented by impressive voice acting and memorable quotes that enhance the overall experience. While the music itself is generally well-received, the options for adjusting audio settings are limited.
- “Incredible voice acting in the first couple of missions gives you a taste of it, with memorable and unique quotes that are pure music to every ear.”
- “The in-game music is on by default and adds a vibrant atmosphere to the gameplay.”
- “While the graphics are nothing better than okay, the music is fine and enhances the overall experience.”
- “The in-game music is on by default and is a little too loud.”
- “The options menu is very limited; you only have a few resolution options, subtitles, gamma, and volume sliders for music, effects, and dialogue.”
- “The graphics are nothing better than okay, while the music is just fine.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and frustrating, often overshadowing the potential for tactical combat and engaging gameplay. Many feel that the grinding system is overly demanding, requiring excessive time investment to progress.
- “Instead of tactical combat or engaging gunplay, players are treated to an almost broken system that turns what could have been a thrilling experience into a tedious grind.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game is criticized for its clichéd dialogue and lackluster voice acting, which detracts from the overall experience and fails to engage players on a deeper level. The gameplay is likened to a "stormtrooper simulator," further emphasizing the disconnect from any meaningful emotional engagement.
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game's atmosphere has been criticized for lacking vibrancy and immersion, with players feeling as though they are in a lifeless environment rather than an engaging warzone.
- “Instead of transporting players to a dynamic warzone, the game seems to exist in a world devoid of life and atmosphere.”
- “The environments feel lifeless and uninspired, failing to immerse players in the intended setting.”
- “There is a distinct lack of ambiance, making it hard to feel any connection to the game's world.”
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Many users feel that the game suffers from insufficient character development and narrative depth, resulting in a diminished emotional investment in the missions and their outcomes.
- “The lack of character development or narrative depth makes it hard to care about the missions or their outcomes.”
- “The characters feel one-dimensional, and their arcs are predictable and uninspired.”
- “There is minimal growth or change in the characters throughout the game, leaving them feeling static and unengaging.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy has been criticized as a cash grab, suggesting that the developer is prioritizing profit over player experience, potentially capitalizing on current events for financial gain.
- “It's almost like the developer needed a cash grab before Libya fades from current events.”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The optimization of the game has been widely criticized, with users reporting poor graphics, unresponsive controls, and overall subpar performance.
- “Horrible graphics, controls, and performance.”
- “The game runs poorly on all settings, making it unplayable.”
- “I experienced constant frame drops and long loading times, which ruined the experience.”