Game of Earth

About

"Game of Earth" is a simulation game that allows players to become a god and control their own world in a sandbox setting. With its wonderful visuals, players can shape the land, create and destroy at will, but beware of being disturbed by ads. Experience the power of creation and manipulation in this immersive and unique gaming experience.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

76%

Audience ScoreBased on 408 reviews

gameplay7 positive mentions

monetization44 negative mentions

The game has a cute art style and engaging concept that makes it enjoyable to play.
It encourages players to think critically about environmental decisions and their consequences.
The gameplay is addictive and offers a unique challenge in managing resources and population.

The game is heavily reliant on ads, often forcing players to watch them to make progress or understand choices.
Gameplay is unbalanced, with pollution levels rising too quickly and eco-friendly options being too expensive.
Players often feel railroaded into making decisions that lead to negative outcomes, causing frustration and a sense of helplessness.

monetization
46 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
2%
2%
96%
The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized for being overly aggressive, with players frequently forced to watch ads to progress or make choices, leading to a frustrating experience. Many users report that even after paying to remove ads, they still encounter them, which detracts significantly from gameplay enjoyment. Overall, the balance between monetization and user experience is seen as heavily skewed towards ad revenue, making the game feel more like a platform for advertisements than a fun gaming experience.
- “This game basically forces you to either watch ads or pay for the in-game currency to actually play it.”
- “You literally can't do anything without watching ads.”
- “If the only way to succeed didn't involve watching ads, this game would be much more playable.”
gameplay
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
48%
22%
The gameplay of this game is criticized for being heavily marred by excessive ads, making it feel more like a money grab than an enjoyable experience. While some users appreciate the cute graphics and potential of the game, many express that the mechanics are unbalanced, lacking depth, and often frustrating due to random outcomes and a need for more engaging content. Overall, the gameplay is seen as mediocre, with calls for improvements to enhance player enjoyment and reduce ad interference.
- “Super cute and good take on the reigns style gameplay.”
- “Has a ton of potential if gameplay improvements are made.”
- “Fun gameplay!”
- “Seems fun at first, then you realize it's an ad-filled nightmare that puts you in a situation to pay, or constantly keep losing after minutes worth of gameplay.”
- “Lacks any real gameplay; you make decisions but too often results feel random or are gated by ads.”
- “It's actually a great game, yeah... cute graphics and all... too bad the gameplay kinda seems forced to end quickly.”
graphics
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
53%
29%
18%
The graphics of the game are widely praised for their cute and high-quality art style, with many users highlighting the appealing chibi designs and vibrant colors. However, some players noted that while the visuals are engaging, they can become repetitive, and the overall gameplay experience may not live up to the graphical quality. Overall, the graphics are considered the standout feature of the game, often overshadowing its mediocre gameplay.
- “I love the graphics.”
- “Cute graphics, amazing concept.”
- “The graphics are high quality and the three characters look super cute!”
- “Everything is pink distorted and can't play it; I think it's a graphics issue.”
- “Summarizing, this game's gameplay is mediocre, so the graphics are the best element about the game.”
- “It's actually a great game, yeah... cute graphics and all... too bad the gameplay kinda seems forced to end quickly.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users feel that the game's replayability is hindered by the reliance on ads for success, suggesting that clearer and more engaging replay value could enhance the overall experience.
- “Needs more visible replay value from the start.”
- “If the only way to succeed didn't involve watching ads, this game would be much more enjoyable.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game is generally well-received, contributing positively to the overall experience, but some users find it frustrating that it interrupts music apps while playing.
- “The game is fun, but it silences music apps, and that's super annoying.”
- “The graphics, music, and especially the gameplay.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
150%
Users find the story aspect to be simple yet challenging, expressing a desire for more depth and the inclusion of quests to enhance the narrative experience.
- “The story feels incomplete and lacks depth.”
- “I found the plot to be predictable and uninspired.”
- “The character development is weak, making it hard to connect with anyone.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews indicate that the grinding aspect of the game is exacerbated by mechanics like carbon management and resource regulation, which push players into a challenging cycle of resource depletion and costly upgrades. This creates a frustrating experience as players feel compelled to engage in repetitive tasks without meaningful progress.
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players find the game to be genuinely funny, highlighting its effective use of humor throughout the gameplay experience.
- “This game had me laughing out loud with its clever jokes and witty dialogue!”
- “The humor is spot-on, making even the most mundane tasks entertaining.”
- “I love how the game incorporates absurd situations that keep the gameplay light-hearted and fun.”