Furious Angels

About

Furious Angels is a single player action game. It was developed by MorfeoDev and was released on February 27, 2017. It received positive reviews from players.

Furious Angels is a fast-paced, post-apocalyptic top-down shooter. Equip an arsenal of weapons and battle through hordes of mutants to save humanity from extinction. Unique characters, multiple endings, and an atmospheric soundtrack provide an immersive experience in a grim world.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

90%

Audience ScoreBased on 494 reviews

graphics66 positive mentions

story8 negative mentions

Addictive gameplay with a simple yet engaging mechanics that are easy to learn but hard to master.
Great visuals and satisfying destruction effects that enhance the overall experience.
Daily leaderboard resets keep the competition fresh and encourage repeated play sessions.

Limited content with only a few enemy types and upgrades, leading to potential repetitiveness.
Sound design is lacking, with weak sound effects and a repetitive music track that doesn't match the action.
The tank upgrade can feel like a downgrade, slowing down gameplay and making it harder to maneuver.

graphics
124 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
53%
45%
2%
The graphics of the game are generally praised for their charm and aesthetic appeal, featuring a low-poly style that runs smoothly even on low-end hardware. Many players appreciate the beautiful environments and effective destruction mechanics, which enhance the overall experience, although some desire more detail in certain aspects. Overall, the visuals are considered a strong point, contributing positively to the nostalgic and engaging gameplay.
- “I love the graphics, the music; it caters to my old-arcade-shooter nostalgia each time.”
- “The game has some really beautiful environments, and the graphics are really well designed and laid out.”
- “Graphics look cool as hell, nice partial destruction system.”
- “It’s a simplistic game, both in graphics and sounds.”
- “Even for its price this game does not offer enough content: shooting is dull, graphics are all brown, music does not fit the action, 'progression' system is linear (and you can't even stop upgrading to that slow tank), scoreboards constantly reset (and there are like 50 players total so not much to compete with).”
- “It looks quite good but to be honest you'd be better off playing Luftrausers, as except for the minimalist graphics it does everything Furious Angels does, but far better.”
gameplay
110 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
61%
3%
The gameplay is characterized by its fast-paced, addictive mechanics and simple controls, making it accessible yet challenging. While the game offers a satisfying arcade experience with a variety of upgrades and tactical choices, some players note a lack of depth and repetitiveness due to limited gameplay content. Overall, it is praised for its visual style and fluidity, appealing for short play sessions but may not satisfy those seeking a more extensive gaming experience.
- “Great visual style and addictive gameplay, perfectly suited for short coffee breaks but don't expect anything deep or long-lasting here.”
- “The basic mechanics are rock solid; the controls are smooth as silk, the difficulty ramps slowly and steadily because of a well-designed wave pattern and consistent upgrades.”
- “A handful of layered mechanics combine to give you constant interesting tactical choices while being fully concentrated on surviving the increasingly overwhelming enemy onslaught.”
- “The bad: there's very little gameplay to actually experience.”
- “I recommend this game to anyone, but be aware, it's repetitive because it has permadeath and you need to start always from the beginning... and it's hard because it has mechanical fruitflies!”
- “Recommended when you can get it on sale... gameplay is limited of course to survive as long as you can, when you power up enough to be a tank it actually makes you slow and you are shot down quite quickly, in fact I look forward to the effect to wear off and just fly around again.”
music
96 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
63%
4%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players appreciating its nostalgic and chill aesthetic, while others criticize it for being repetitive, bland, and lacking energy. Many users note that the sound effects are weak and often overshadowed by the music, detracting from the overall experience. Overall, while the soundtrack has its moments, it generally lacks variety and fails to enhance the game's action-packed atmosphere.
- “I love the graphics, the music; it caters to my old-arcade-shooter nostalgia each time.”
- “The music, slow motion, and sound design are very rewarding!”
- “Love it - super simple 2D shooter, but what makes it special to me is the understated music, differing enemy types, physically simulated shrapnel, and slidey ship.”
- “The music is rather bland and uninspired, the sound effects are dull and not rewarding.”
- “The music does not match with the intense dogfighting that is going on and is somewhat out of place.”
- “The sound and music are bad, they take more away than they add and start out very quiet and you need to turn the volume up.”
story
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
15%
45%
40%
The game lacks a substantial story or campaign, with players noting that there is no real progression or narrative depth. While the gameplay is enjoyable as a twin-stick shooter, it feels repetitive and shallow due to the absence of a story, multiplayer options, or meaningful upgrades. Overall, those seeking a rich narrative experience will be disappointed.
- “But if the developer can make a multiplayer and campaign with a story, this game will be the best of the best shooter games.”
- “If you're looking for a story, however, this isn't your game.”
- “Just don't expect a 60-hour deal with a fleshed-out story, multiplayer lobbies, crafting systems, and economies.”
- “That said, don't go into this expecting anything too in-depth; there is no story, there is no real progression, and there is no beating it.”
- “Oh, and there’s no campaign, no story, no upgrade grinding.”
- “If you're looking for story, however, this isn't your game.”
grinding
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game tedious and unfulfilling, as the initial gameplay experience can be fully explored in just 15-30 minutes, leaving hours of repetitive runs for leaderboard rankings. The lack of a campaign, story, or meaningful progression diminishes the sense of achievement, with most achievements tied to grinding rather than skill improvement or tactical development. Overall, the grinding feels monotonous and lacks depth, leading to a disengaged player base.
- “It's easy to see everything in the game in 15-30 minutes; everything after that is grinding for a higher spot on the leaderboard. The game is so simple there's not even much in the way of improving your skills and coming up with better tactics. It's just a matter of doing run after run after run for hours and hours while 85% of players never played for more than 1 hour in a day.”
- “There is no real sense of progression or achievement, and all of the achievements are based off of grinding.”
- “Oh, and there’s no campaign, no story, no upgrade grinding.”
replayability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The game offers a high level of replayability with its engaging airship and fighter jet mechanics, allowing for intense dogfights in diverse extraterrestrial settings. However, some users feel that the lack of a structured progression system and campaign limits its long-term replay value, making it more of a casual time killer than a deeply engaging experience.
- “Wonderful game, great price (at least when I got it) and lots of replayability.”
- “Infinitely replayable airships, fighter jets, and intense dogfights on extraterrestrial planets, fighting death star systems, or like cruisers, but homeworld destroyer types, and you're just this puny jet that eventually becomes a flying tank.”
- “It would benefit greatly from proper progression and campaign; as it is, it is a time killer and not very replayable.”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
25%
50%
The game's optimization is hindered by its Unity engine, leading to inconsistent performance issues that affect gameplay. Players have noted that these performance problems can detract from the overall experience, especially when competing on daily leaderboards.
- “Your performance, beyond a personal sense of mastery, is recorded on a daily leaderboard.”
- “It's Unity-based, so the game is haunted by bad performance.”
stability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
75%
The game generally performs well, even at maximum settings, indicating strong stability on capable machines. However, players have noted the presence of minor bugs and glitches that, while overlooked by the developers, do not significantly impact the overall experience.
- “It runs great on my machine at max settings, which is to be expected of a game of this technical complexity.”
- “The game suffers from several weird bugs and glitches that the developer seems to have overlooked, which can be quite frustrating.”
- “There are numerous stability issues, including crashes and performance drops, that detract from the overall experience.”
- “The game is plagued by frequent bugs and glitches that disrupt gameplay, making it feel unfinished.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The humor in the game is consistently praised, with multiple users highlighting its comedic elements as a standout feature.
- “It's funny.”
- “It's funny.”
- “It's funny.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization aspect of the game has been criticized for failing to deliver on the excitement promised in its advertising, leaving players feeling disappointed and unfulfilled during gameplay.