FPS: Fun Puzzle Shooter

About

"FPS: Fun Puzzle Shooter" is a unique game that combines the fast-paced action of a first-person shooter with the challenge of puzzle-solving. Instead of shooting enemies, your goal is to hit specific targets in each level to progress. With 30 levels that introduce new targets and challenges, the game requires strategic thinking and a deep understanding of each level's mechanics. The upbeat music and colorful graphics make for a fun and engaging experience. .

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

64%

Audience ScoreBased on 28 reviews

graphics4 positive mentions

gameplay2 negative mentions

The game offers a fun and challenging puzzle experience, appealing to players who enjoy difficult gameplay.
It has a unique concept that stands out, reminiscent of certain game modes in other titles.
For its low price, it provides decent graphics and a variety of achievements.

The game suffers from significant technical issues, including slow performance and poor optimization.
Gameplay is frustrating due to limited ammo, leading to repetitive trial-and-error mechanics.
The use of uncredited assets and overall design choices reflect a lack of effort and ethical considerations from the developers.

graphics
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
42%
25%
The game's graphics are criticized for their lazy minimalist style, featuring untextured low-polygon assets that evoke a poorly executed 3D game from the early 1990s. Many players feel this lack of detail is a cover for the developers' shortcomings, detracting from the overall experience, despite some acknowledging decent graphics in certain aspects. Additionally, performance issues on lower-end hardware have been noted, raising concerns about optimization.
- “A game that gives you a lot of achievement, has good puzzles and decent graphics.”
- “+ decent graphics”
- “The graphics are very simple.”
- “The lack of textures is a method that lazy developers often use to disguise their lack of talent or interest in doing the graphics properly, trying to pass it off as 'art' or 'we made it look bad on purpose', which really isn't something gamers should have to put up with.”
- “Terribly slow on a laptop with a Core i5, despite the fact that there is nothing to slow down; the graphics are very simple.”
- “I wish I could scale things down for weaker graphic cards!”
gameplay
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The gameplay is criticized for being excessively slow and tedious, requiring players to crawl from platform to platform, which detracts from the overall experience and makes it feel boring.
- “The gameplay is terribly boring - to throw a ball into each window, you need to slowly crawl from platform to platform.”
- “Movement speed kills gameplay.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The monetization strategy of the game has been criticized for being a cash grab, with accusations of plagiarism due to the lack of credit given to the original artists and developers of the assets used. This has led to negative perceptions of the game's integrity and value.
- “The developers didn't credit any of the artists and real game developers who created the assets, so this is plagiarism, as well as a cash grab.”
- “The monetization strategy feels exploitative, prioritizing profit over player experience.”
- “It's frustrating to see so many paywalls in a game that could have been enjoyable without constant prompts to spend money.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music aspect of the game has received criticism for the absence of in-game sound, with users expressing that a good soundtrack would significantly enhance the overall experience.
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The optimization of the game is widely criticized, with multiple users stating it is the weakest aspect, indicating significant performance issues.
- “Optimization is the worst part of the game.”