FOS

About

In this game, you can do whatever you want, not necessarily follow the story of the game, you're not some dirty farmer, right? And for whom did this pathetic, boring, and generally unbearable story come up, because you don't always have to follow it right?

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

68%

Audience ScoreBased on 104 reviews

humor10 positive mentions

music3 negative mentions

The game offers a fun concept with lots of replayability and achievements to unlock.
It's a free game, making it accessible for players who want to try something new without spending money.
Some players find it entertaining and humorous, with a retro feel and interesting death descriptions.

The game is plagued by bugs, frequent crashes, and poor controls, making it frustrating to play.
There is a lack of sound effects and the music is repetitive, which detracts from the overall experience.
Many players feel it is a shameless clone of another game, lacking originality and clear objectives.

music
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
58%
25%
The music in the game has received largely negative feedback, with players criticizing its repetitive and uninspired nature, often describing it as maddening due to its short loops. Many users noted the lack of sound effects and the need to manually select music, which detracts from the overall experience. While some found the music better than the game itself, the consensus suggests that it fails to enhance the gameplay, leading many to recommend muting it in favor of alternative audio.
- “Fortunately, the music is better than the game.”
- “My only complaint is the music used in the game; at least you have an option to turn it off.”
- “Needs music to match the zone, not as background noise.”
- “The lack of sound effects is quite disappointing, and I only realized there was toggleable music to play before coming to write this review.”
- “The music is maddening because it's so short and repetitive; at first you're like, okay, this is a bit lit, then after hearing the same beat for the 1200th time, it burrows into the annoyed part of your brain and brutally punches it.”
humor
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is generally well-received, with players appreciating its funny moments and charming art style. However, some find the repetitive nature of dying for achievements to be tedious, leading to a loss of interest despite a few entertaining deaths. Overall, the game is considered a lighthearted and amusing experience, particularly enjoyable when played casually.
- “I think it was a funny, yet adventure-filled game with weird skins for achievements.”
- “This game is great; it's fun trying to get all the achievements. The story is funny and interesting. This game is definitely one of my favorite games :)”
- “If this game was a potato, it'd be a funny potato.”
stability
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is plagued by significant stability issues, including frequent crashes and bugs that affect gameplay and achievements. While some players find it enjoyable despite these problems, others report that the instability severely hampers their experience, particularly for completionists. Overall, the game's stability is a major concern, with many users highlighting its buggy nature.
- “Very stiff controls, no sound effects, pretty boring and buggy.”
- “It's buggy; I literally stopped playing after 45 out of 100 achievements because it started crashing randomly at every death. I tried re-installing and repairing, but nothing worked. RIP.”
- “The endings and achievements are also very buggy and sometimes don't work.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The game's story is described as funny and interesting, with potential for multiple endings and engaging objectives. However, some players find the repetitive nature of dying to unlock achievements tedious, leading to a loss of interest in fully exploring the narrative. Overall, while the story has its entertaining moments, it may not be compelling enough to sustain long-term engagement.
- “I'm sure there are great endings yet to be uncovered, and some intriguing storylines to explore by completing each objective.”
- “This game is great! It's fun trying to get all the achievements. The story is funny and interesting; this game is definitely one of my favorites! :)”
- “The narrative is engaging and keeps you invested in the characters and their journeys throughout the game.”
- “When dying is rewarded with achievements, it's a bit redundant to have to die and complete the same steps over and over again to get to other deaths and further in the story. I lost interest in fully completing the game; some of the deaths are entertaining, but nothing majorly impressive or funny from how far I got.”
- “The story feels disjointed and lacks a coherent narrative, making it difficult to stay engaged with the characters and their motivations.”
- “I found the plot to be predictable and uninspired, with twists that were easy to see coming and characters that felt one-dimensional.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of these games is criticized as exploitative, with many being labeled as "cash grabs" that prioritize profit over quality. Users note that these titles often feature locked resolutions and controls, low-effort art, and are quickly released to capitalize on the market, undermining legitimate indie developers and flooding platforms like Steam with subpar products. Additionally, there are concerns about fake reviews being generated to promote these asset flips.
- “They're nothing but cash grabs, and they harm genuine indie developers by reducing their visibility on Steam.”
- “They're all written in either Russian or broken English, appear almost immediately after the game launched on Steam, all have a direct Steam purchase of the game, and the accounts are used consistently to write fake reviews for asset flips and other cash grabs/scams.”
- “As usual with asset flip cash grab games, resolution and controls are locked, and there's all the lazy 2D retro pixel art slapped together to make a minimum viable product for their latest cash grab.”
gameplay
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The gameplay is criticized for being poorly executed, featuring numerous game-breaking bugs and a lack of engaging content, leading to a tedious experience. Additionally, players have noted persistent spelling errors despite attempts at correction, further detracting from the overall enjoyment.
- “Overall, the game is poorly put together, with lots of persistent game-breaking bugs, honestly boring gameplay, and spelling errors despite attempts to correct them according to update logs.”
- “The gameplay is generally very draggy.”
- “Gameplay lacks engagement and feels tedious.”
graphics
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The graphics have been widely criticized for their poor quality, with users noting issues such as a terrible text font, unappealing colors, and overall subpar visuals that detract from the gaming experience.
- “Lots of stupid deaths, horrible text font, colors, and the visuals are generally terrible at all times.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players highlight the game's significant replayability, noting that it offers more content and depth than initially anticipated, encouraging multiple playthroughs.
- “There is a lot of replayability; it's longer than you might expect at first.”
- “The game offers numerous paths and choices, making each playthrough feel fresh and exciting.”
- “With multiple endings and varied character interactions, you'll find yourself coming back for more.”