Femida

About

Femida is a single player role playing game with mystery and erotic themes. It was developed by loznevoy and was released on February 25, 2020. It received negative reviews from critics and mostly positive reviews from players.

Judge Simulator 2020. Play the role of Judge Daemon Mardoch and investigate the disappearance of your father during the Last Revolution. Set in the dystopian State with a post-WWII level of tech and noir aesthetics.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

76%Audience ScoreBased on 21 reviews

story5 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

The game features an intriguing and deep story with multiple endings that impact the overall plot.
Gameplay involves thoughtful decision-making through examining evidence and questioning testimonies, providing a unique court simulation experience.
The developers actively update and polish the game to fix bugs and improve it over time.

The game suffers from poor English translation with numerous grammatical errors, typos, and awkward phrasing that hurt immersion.
Technical issues such as bugs, loading problems, and a simplistic, outdated UI similar to old point-and-click or browser games detract from the experience.
The graphics are low quality with no customization options, and the gameplay can become tedious and repetitive for players seeking richer interaction.

story
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
47%
20%
The story offers an intriguing, dark, and layered narrative set in an alternative post-WW2 society where players make impactful decisions as a judge. While some find the writing flawed or poorly translated, many appreciate the plot twists, humor, and overall depth, though the experience may feel limited due to simplicity and brevity.
- “You're a judge in an alternative post-WW2 type society and you're presented with various cases as part of an overarching story. You must read documentation carefully to make decisions that influence the overall story, creating a unique choose-your-own-adventure experience.”
- “Overall, the game is simple and quick to finish (less than 3 hours for one playthrough), but it promises a deep, layered story.”
- “If you can get past some initial issues, the darkness of the story and the twists and turns the plot takes may grab you.”
- “If you ignore the bad writing (for a story-focused dialogue game), the game mechanics are also pretty bad and tedious.”
- “Though even with a proper translation, the story content itself seemed pretty meh, and the game mechanics were just lame and lazy.”
- “You're a judge in an alternative post-WW2 type society and you're presented with various cases as part of an overarching story. You must read documentation carefully to make decisions that influence the overall story... like a badly framed choose-your-own-adventure, but formatted like a 1998 browser/flash game.”
gameplay
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The gameplay is generally criticized for being simplistic, tedious, and lacking depth, often relying on repetitive, uninspired mechanics that feel borrowed without improvement. Users find it more like a basic browser game with minimal interactive elements, primarily involving memorization of dialogue trees and limited trial activities. Overall, the gameplay is seen as lazy and unengaging, with little to offer beyond basic evidence review and trial initiation.
- “Gameplay is good, with only a few minor grammatical errors during speech.”
- “The gameplay consists of going through evidence and witnesses prior to slamming down on your gavel to officially initiate the trial.”
- “The main mechanic for the court scene involves remembering which dialogue trees make the court angry and avoiding those, adding a strategic element.”
- “If you ignore the bad writing (for a story-focused dialogue game), the game mechanics are also pretty bad and tedious.”
- “It feels a bit like they stole some of the game mechanics from other similar games without being aware of what made those games good or fun.”
- “Though even with a proper translation, the story content itself seemed pretty meh, and the game mechanics were just lame and lazy.”
graphics
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
20%
60%
The graphics feature simplistic 2D art with limited customization beyond resolution scaling, resulting in minimal improvement to visual quality. While the rustic/noir art style suits the game's theme, the overall visuals are considered lackluster and somewhat basic.
- “With a rustic/noir art style, Femida leads you through a case in a courtroom.”
- “While there are options to change the resolution for the game, all this does is scale up the simplistic 2D art assets used to make the game, which makes little or no difference to the graphics quality.”
- “Without any other substantial graphics tweaks, it's not possible for gamers to improve the lacklustre 2D visuals.”
- “Without any other substantial graphics tweaks, it's not possible for gamers to improve the lacklustre 2D visuals.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game offers an engaging experience with multiple endings and challenging choices but suffers from bugs and a dated, clunky UI that affects overall stability.
- “The game is buggy, and the UI feels like an old point-and-click game.”
- “Quirky little title with multiple endings and seriously difficult choices to make, but it is buggy.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Grinding in the game is considered tedious and poorly executed, with rough writing and difficult-to-read text further detracting from the experience. Overall, the mechanics related to grinding lack engagement and polish.
- “If you ignore the bad writing (for a story-focused dialogue game), the game mechanics are also pretty bad and tedious.”
- “The writing is rough and the reading becomes tedious (the font style is a bit hard on the eyes).”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's humor is well-received, with witty writing that complements an intriguing plot, providing an enjoyable and entertaining experience.
- “The plot is intriguing and the writing is funny.”