EA Sports FC 25

Buoyed by a new strategy engine (FC IQ) an emphasis on 5-on-5 (Rush), and women's modes, FC 25 is a nice upgrade from FC 24.

59%Game Brain Score

graphics, music

gameplay, stability

52% User Score Based on 30,776 reviews

Critic Score 84%Based on 2 reviews

Platforms

Buy Nowfrom €69.99

Buy NowGet on Steam €69.99 Buy NowGet on Xbox Games Store Buy NowGet on Epic Games Store Buy NowGet on PS Store $69.99

About

EA Sports FC 25 is a single player and multiplayer sport game. It was developed by EA Romania and was released on June 21, 2024. It received positive reviews from critics and neutral reviews from players.

"EA SPORTS FC 25 Ultimate Edition introduces Club Membership, offering exclusive benefits to fans who played FC 24 before 27 September 2024. Members receive a badge, kit, and rewards across game modes. Founders can unlock exclusive cosmetic items. Virtual currency purchases offer random virtual in-game items."

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

52%

Audience ScoreBased on 30,776 reviews

graphics162 positive mentions

gameplay569 negative mentions

The graphics are stunning, delivering a more realistic and immersive experience than ever before.
Gameplay feels more realistic than ever, with smoother animations and improved tactical options.
Rush mode’s 5v5 chaos and deep career options offer extensive replayability, encouraging players to return.

The game is plagued by severe optimization issues, including frequent crashes, stuttering, and bugs that make it nearly unplayable.
Many players express frustration over the lack of meaningful innovation and engaging narratives, leading to a repetitive experience.
The heavy reliance on microtransactions and pay-to-win mechanics detracts from the overall enjoyment and fairness of the game.

gameplay
2,006 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
56%
28%
The gameplay in EA Sports FC 25 has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing frustration over persistent bugs, lag, and unresponsive mechanics. While some appreciate the smoother animations and minor improvements, the overall experience is marred by issues such as scripted outcomes, inconsistent AI behavior, and a lack of meaningful innovation compared to previous titles. Many players recommend avoiding the game unless significant updates are made to address these gameplay concerns.
- “The gameplay feels more realistic than ever - player movements are smoother, and the new tactical options add real depth to matches.”
- “Ea Sports FC 25 delivers smooth, realistic gameplay with improved animations and smarter AI.”
- “The gameplay is smooth, the graphics look amazing, and scoring a last-minute goal never gets old.”
- “Game crashes frequently and gameplay mechanics are broken.”
- “The gameplay feels sluggish and clunky, as if players are trying to move through a mud pit.”
- “The gameplay is so bad, you’d have more fun watching paint dry.”
stability
856 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
1%
99%
The stability of the game has been widely criticized, with users reporting frequent crashes, freezes, and a plethora of glitches that severely impact gameplay. Many players experience issues such as the game failing to launch, random disconnections, and unresponsive controls, making it nearly unplayable at times. Despite some enjoyable aspects, the overwhelming number of technical problems has led to a consensus that the game is poorly optimized and riddled with bugs, diminishing the overall experience.
- “Very enjoyable game with no glitches at all !!!!”
- “Furthermore, it's nice to see that they have made more platform stability changes and bug-free initial launch patches, especially since FC24 was really buggy compared to FC25 when I first bought it.”
- “Bought this game on the 50% sale and honestly this is a pretty good FIFA. Coming from 2022, there are a lot of upgrades throughout the whole game from Ultimate Team to Clubs. PS4 controller works great, I have no connection issues and the game runs great.”
- “The game constantly crashes and is full of bugs and glitches; it's just a money spinner.”
- “It will crash upon launching; I played for days before, but I cannot play at all anymore. Terribly optimized game; it crashes and won't work. I have tried everything, yet no troubleshooting fix works.”
- “The game is a buggy mess that freezes and crashes every few matches.”
optimization
554 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
36%
55%
The optimization of EA Sports FC 25 has received overwhelmingly negative feedback from users, with many citing severe stuttering, input lag, and frequent crashes, making the game nearly unplayable on PC. Despite some claims of improved performance compared to previous titles, the overall consensus is that the game is poorly optimized, particularly for high-end systems, leading to a frustrating experience for players. Many users recommend avoiding the game until significant optimization updates are implemented.
- “The gameplay is smoother, and performance-wise, it’s a big improvement; I rarely get any FPS drops.”
- “Better optimization and was able to achieve a decent performance boost compared to FC 24 on ultra settings.”
- “One of the first things I noticed about FIFA 25 is that it feels smoother and more optimized compared to previous versions.”
- “The performance is terrible on PC because it’s clearly not optimized at all.”
- “The worst optimized game.. crashed at 4k on my RTX 3080 then I tried 2k still crashed then 1080p and it still crashed.. thought it was my GPU and upgraded to RTX 5080 and it still crashes in every resolution.”
- “Unplayable, always stuttering on PC as the previous ones.”
graphics
512 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
32%
59%
9%
The graphics in EA Sports FC 25 receive mixed reviews, with many players praising the stunning visuals and improved player models, while others criticize the game for bugs, poor optimization, and a lack of significant upgrades from previous titles. Some users report that despite having high-end PCs, they experience lag, stuttering, and graphical glitches, detracting from the overall experience. Overall, while the graphics are often described as beautiful and immersive, they are marred by performance issues and a sense of stagnation in innovation.
- “The graphics are stunning, delivering a more realistic and immersive experience than ever before.”
- “With its next-level visuals, deep strategic systems, and fresh rush gameplay, it's the best-looking and tactically rich entry in the series.”
- “Graphically, EA Sports FC 25 offers incremental improvements over its predecessors.”
- “The graphics are awful—somehow even worse than FIFA 22, which looked way better in comparison.”
- “The graphics just look better on the new gen consoles and it's smoother too.”
- “The graphics did not receive major upgrades, but the interface and the game this year were redesigned and modified almost completely.”
monetization
193 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
2%
46%
52%
The monetization in EA Sports FC 25 has drawn widespread criticism for its heavy reliance on microtransactions, particularly within the Ultimate Team mode, which many players describe as a "cash grab" and "pay-to-win." Users express frustration over the aggressive push for in-game purchases, the introduction of real advertisements, and the lack of meaningful improvements in gameplay and modes, leading to a perception that the game prioritizes profit over player experience. Overall, the monetization strategy is seen as exploitative, detracting from the enjoyment of the game.
- “While it doesn’t reinvent the series and still has some bugs and heavy microtransactions, it’s a solid and enjoyable football experience overall.”
- “Ultimate team introduces player evolutions and integrates women’s players, but the grind and microtransactions remain a hurdle for some.”
- “With a discount, it’s a solid buy and can provide countless hours of fun, even if there are a few quirks and balancing issues with monetization.”
- “Stay far away from this game — it’s fully pay-to-win and drowning in microtransactions.”
- “The game is riddled with scripting and aggressive monetization tactics, constantly pushing you to spend money and keeping you engaged through artificial mechanics.”
- “Ultimate team is still the primary focus, of course—stuffed with microtransactions and pay-to-win nonsense, while actual game stability and realism are treated like afterthoughts.”
grinding
76 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
10%
86%
The grinding aspect of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with players describing it as tedious, excessively time-consuming, and often unrewarding. Many users feel that the grind is exacerbated by a pay-to-win model, where those who spend money gain significant advantages over non-paying players, leading to frustration and a sense of futility in their efforts. While some players find enjoyment in the grind, the consensus is that it detracts from the overall experience, making it feel more like a chore than a game.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding if you are a completionist.”
- “A little grindy.”
- “A bit grindy sometimes.”
- “They shove packs down your throat with overpriced promos, 1% drop rates, and zero rewards for grinding.”
- “The grind for rewards is tedious unless you’re willing to spend extra cash, making the game feel unfair for non-paying players.”
- “It's a never-ending cycle of spending or grinding, with very little reward for actual talent or strategy.”
music
75 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
62%
11%
The music aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with some praising the diverse and catchy soundtrack while others criticize it as forgettable or even terrible. Many players noted that while the soundtrack features popular tracks, it lacks the eclecticism of previous installments, and some experienced issues with music playback during gameplay. Overall, the music is seen as a highlight for some, but many agree it does not compensate for the game's other shortcomings.
- “The soundtrack is diverse and fantastic.”
- “Coupled with an incredible soundtrack and sound design, it’s an emotional rollercoaster from start to finish.”
- “Banger soundtrack, best since '22.”
- “Soundtrack pulses with global hits, commentary from Martin Tyler evolves slightly, but ambient chants and boot-on-ball thwacks feel rote—nothing groundbreaking after years of the same engine.”
- “Also, the music is bad, probably the worst soundtrack we've ever gotten.”
- “The music in the menus doesn't even deserve a mention, completely forgettable.”
humor
73 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is described as both subtle and absurd, often relying on a deep understanding of theoretical physics to fully appreciate its jokes, which can lead to a mix of laughter and frustration among players. Many reviews highlight the game's numerous bugs and gameplay issues as unintentionally hilarious, creating a shared experience of comedic misery, especially in competitive modes. Overall, while the humor can be entertaining, it often stems from the game's flaws rather than intentional comedic design.
- “The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics, most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head.”
- “And yet… somehow it’s hilariously entertaining in the 'I-can’t-believe-this-is-real' way.”
- “By the end, you’ll have developed a newfound respect for literally any other game ever made, while simultaneously laughing at the absurdity of your own suffering.”
story
67 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
7%
75%
18%
The reviews indicate a strong dissatisfaction with the lack of a dedicated story mode in the game, with many users expressing disappointment over the absence of engaging narratives similar to previous installments like FIFA 17's Alex Hunter storyline. Players report bugs and issues with the career mode that detract from immersion, and there is a general sentiment that the game feels repetitive and lacks meaningful storytelling elements. Overall, the consensus is that the game's narrative aspects are severely lacking, leading to frustration among fans of story-driven gameplay.
- “Every aspect of the game, from the mechanics to the story, is meticulously crafted to keep players engaged and entertained.”
- “The narrative is gripping, with a storyline that’s both engaging and thought-provoking.”
- “The characters are well-developed, and the plot offers plenty of twists and turns, ensuring players are always eager to see what happens next.”
- “Notifications, updates, and player storylines often don’t work properly, which breaks immersion and sometimes makes it hard to track transfers, injuries, or morale.”
- “It is mandatory that you play with the live editor to create your own storylines as the social media news feature sabotages itself with wrong news all the time and talks about random generic transfers that make no sense.”
- “The moral of the story; there's a reason that only a month after release, eafc 25 is a whopping 60% off on PlayStation 5... yeah...”
emotional
44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
98%
7%
The emotional responses to the game are overwhelmingly negative, with players expressing feelings of frustration, disappointment, and even heartbreak due to its numerous glitches and perceived unfair mechanics. Many describe the experience as emotionally taxing, likening it to a toxic relationship that leads to anger and despair, while some humorously note that it could serve as a form of therapy for their emotional instability. Overall, the game seems to evoke a strong emotional reaction, often leaving players feeling drained and disillusioned.
- “10/10 - would get emotionally destroyed by DDA again.”
- “It’s not a game mode, it’s a group therapy session where every teammate is emotionally unstable and a case study in disappointment.”
- “The game manages to tap into that part of your brain that makes you feel like you’re on the verge of a breakthrough, but in reality, it’s pulling you deeper into the grind, causing more frustration and emotional investment than it should.”
- “The game tries to be emotionally gripping, but it often falls flat.”
- “I expected a deep emotional experience, but it felt superficial and forced.”
- “The emotional moments lacked authenticity and didn't resonate with me.”
atmosphere
25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
32%
56%
12%
The atmosphere in the game is a mixed bag, with many praising the stunning visuals, immersive stadium sounds, and lifelike player animations that enhance the authenticity of matches. However, some players criticize the lack of atmosphere in certain modes, particularly in player career mode, where matches feel repetitive and lifeless. Overall, while the game excels in creating an electrifying stadium experience, inconsistencies in player models and certain gameplay elements detract from the overall immersion.
- “Visually, this is stunning with improved player likenesses and stadium atmospheres that truly capture the pageantry of real football, especially in the Premier League.”
- “The crowd chants, players move with fluid realism, and the atmosphere captures the intensity from the live stadium.”
- “Stadiums are meticulously recreated, and atmospheric elements—like crowd animations and ambient sounds—add to the overall immersion.”
- “Player models remain stiff and lifeless, stadiums lack any atmosphere, and animations are still riddled with awkward, robotic movements.”
- “The atmosphere in player career mode is nonexistent; whether it’s preseason or the NWSL finals, every match feels the same.”
- “Last year's UI menu in career mode was pretty great, this year's it's trash; it's full of black color and no atmosphere—it doesn't seem real but fake.”
replayability
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The game's replayability is highlighted by its engaging modes, such as Rush mode and the deep career and ultimate team options, which offer a variety of experiences and encourage players to return. However, some users express frustration with gameplay issues and server performance, suggesting that these factors can impact the overall enjoyment and replay value. Despite mixed opinions, many agree that the game has potential for extensive replayability, especially with ongoing updates and improvements.
- “Rush mode’s 5v5 chaos injects pure arcade fun, while deep career and ultimate team options—now enriched with women’s leagues—offer endless replayability.”
- “Perhaps most impressive is the replay value FC 25 offers.”
- “Whether it’s the competitive online ultimate team mode, where players build their dream squads, or the immersive career mode, which lets users manage a team or play through the career of an individual footballer, FIFA provides endless replayability.”
- “But this game... I can't comprehend it... FIFA 19 felt more playable and realistic than this trash.”
- “The FIFA from 10 years ago was more realistic, less buggy, and more playable.”
- “Still hot garbage, only slightly more playable after basically redoing how defending works in this poor excuse for a game.”
character development
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers praise the character development for its remarkable attention to detail in design and animation, contributing to a dynamic and immersive world.
- “The attention to detail in character design and animation is remarkable, and the world feels truly dynamic.”
- “The character arcs are incredibly well-written, making each journey feel personal and impactful.”
- “I love how the choices I make influence the characters' development, creating a unique experience every time.”