Fateweaver: The Alchemist's Quandary

About

"Fateweaver: The Alchemist's Quandary" is a new game series by the creators of "The Test Trilogy." As the ancient Fateweaver, players test the laws of morality and delve into the psyche of those seeking aid. They must decide whether to show mercy or invoke divine wrath, creating a unique experience for both content creators and solo players.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Fateweaver: The Alchemist's Quandary screenshot

98%

Audience ScoreBased on 86 reviews

humor4 positive mentions

grinding2 negative mentions

The game offers a unique experience by allowing players to ask questions and decide the fate of the character, which adds depth to the gameplay.
Markus is portrayed as a relatable and complex character, making players feel invested in his journey and redemption.
The storytelling is engaging and thought-provoking, encouraging introspection and emotional connection with the characters.

Many questions feel repetitive or similar, leading to a lack of meaningful choices and diminishing the overall impact of the gameplay.
The game suffers from technical issues, such as missing images that disrupt the experience.
Some players found the plot predictable and lacking in captivating elements, which may detract from the enjoyment for those seeking a more dynamic narrative.

story
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
40%
30%
The story in "Fateweaver" is noted for its depth and realism, offering a more narrative-driven experience compared to the developer's previous titles. While it features limited visuals, the ability to choose different endings encourages replayability to explore various outcomes. Overall, players appreciate the engaging storyline, though some may find the lack of visual elements a drawback.
- “The storytelling and ability to choose your own ending really allows this to have multiple playbacks searching for and listening to all the individual answers.”
- “I also appreciate that his story felt very realistic.”
- “Love the storyline and RPG feel!”
- “Wrong, Fateweaver barely has any visuals to begin with, and the conclusion of the first story doesn't even have any visuals like character models or environments in it.”
- “This was a lot more story-based than the dev's previous games (and it looks like it only has 2 endings), so I would not recommend it if you mainly enjoy the games for the quiz aspect.”
- “I'm very interested in what the Fateweaver's and the Reflection of Fate's story is.”
humor
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game "Smash or Pass" is widely praised for being incredibly entertaining and relatable, often evoking strong laughter and emotional responses. Reviewers appreciate its blend of dark and raw humor, which stimulates both amusement and thought. Overall, the game's comedic elements are highlighted as a standout feature that enhances the overall experience.
- “The second game, Smash or Pass, was incredibly humorous and awfully entertaining.”
- “Haha... you all got me teary-eyed and laughing almost like the Joker.”
- “They are relatable, raw, inspiring, humorous, dark, and somehow always end up stimulating my brain just the perfect amount.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
33%
33%
The graphics in Fateweaver are notably lacking, with minimal visual elements and a complete absence of character models or environments, particularly during key story moments. Overall, players are disappointed by the game's visual presentation.
- “Fateweaver barely has any visuals to begin with, and the conclusion of the first story doesn't even feature any visuals like character models or environments.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the game emotionally impactful, often feeling warmth and joy from its outcomes, while also experiencing heartbreak, particularly with the ending. Many express a desire to replay the game to explore alternative choices for a potentially happier resolution.
- “Highly recommend this; it made me feel all warm and fuzzy inside at the result.”
- “That ending was heartbreaking. I think I need to pick the other option when I play a second time; it might be a little happier. Lol.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game tedious and boring, as the repetitive rephrasing of questions adds to the monotony. Many feel that the lack of meaningful choices and limited variety contribute to an unsatisfactory experience, especially considering the game's price.
- “It doesn't help that after selecting a question, the game reformulates the question in a different manner every time, making for a very tedious read.”
- “Tedious, boring, no (illusion of) choice, too limited and unsatisfactory even for its price.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
The game's atmosphere is significantly impacted by its decision-making mechanics, which shift the experience from introspective exploration to a more constrained detective format. Players feel that the limitation on questioning undermines the immersive atmosphere, as it forces them to grind through multiple options rather than allowing for a natural flow of discovery. This can detract from the overall experience, making it difficult to fully engage with the rich environment the game initially establishes.
- “The atmosphere in this game is incredibly immersive, drawing you into its world with every detail meticulously crafted.”
- “I was captivated by the haunting ambiance that lingers throughout the game, making every moment feel significant and charged with emotion.”
- “The game's atmosphere is a perfect blend of tension and beauty, creating an experience that keeps you on the edge of your seat while also inviting you to explore.”
- “The game steers away from being an introspection prompt and leans towards a godlike detective game. However, the limitation of only being able to ask one question from each set forces players to grind through every permutation to get the full picture, which undermines the atmosphere that the game initially builds so well.”
- “The atmosphere feels inconsistent; it starts strong but quickly loses its depth as the gameplay mechanics limit exploration and meaningful interaction.”
- “While the game has a captivating setting, the lack of engaging elements and repetitive tasks detract from the immersive atmosphere it aims to create.”