European War 4: Napoleon

About

European War 4: Napoleon is a single player casual strategy game. It was developed by EasyTech Games and was released on May 28, 2014. It received positive reviews from players.

European War 4: Napoleon is a single-player strategy game set in the 18th century, featuring over 200 famous generals like Napoleon and Wellington. Players command troops with unique abilities, develop their soldiers from recruits to elite forces, and engage in 84 challenging campaigns across 6 war zones. The game offers excellent gameplay, stellar visuals, and a redesigned map system for immersive strategic battles.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

88%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,540 reviews

graphics45 positive mentions

grinding6 negative mentions

Engaging gameplay that combines strategy and historical elements, making it enjoyable for fans of turn-based strategy games.
The game offers a variety of nations to play, each with unique strengths and weaknesses, enhancing replayability.
No forced ads and minimal pay-to-win elements, allowing players to progress without spending money.

Lack of clear objectives and tutorials, making it difficult for new players to understand game mechanics and goals.
Frequent crashes and loss of progress, especially when switching devices, leading to frustration among players.
AI allies are often unhelpful, failing to support players effectively during battles, which can detract from the overall experience.

graphics
85 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
53%
39%
8%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising the attention to detail and realism, while others note that they haven't aged well or could use improvement. Some appreciate the balance between aesthetics and gameplay, finding the graphics engaging without being overly flashy or childish. Overall, while the graphics are generally considered good for a mobile game, there is a consensus that updates and enhancements could further elevate the visual experience.
- “A lot of attention in animation and graphics has gone into this, and I applaud the developers.”
- “I love the graphics and the realism.”
- “Great graphics and gameplay.”
- “The graphics either get too flashy or too childish.”
- “Terrible graphics, it's so confusing and annoying.”
- “Graphic needs to be improved, although it is still better than the series before.”
gameplay
63 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
52%
43%
5%
The gameplay is generally praised for its solid mechanics, strategic depth, and lack of ads, making it enjoyable and addictive. However, many players express frustration over the inadequate tutorials and unclear explanations of core mechanics, which can lead to confusion and difficulty in understanding gameplay elements. While the game offers a fun experience, some users wish for additional features like diplomacy and improved balance, as well as clearer guidance on gameplay mechanics.
- “Absolutely love the interface and play mechanics, it's definitely superior to many of the other games from this developer.”
- “Fun, and at times tense gameplay, in my opinion the best easy tech game out there.”
- “Great game, I really loved the gameplay.”
- “The game doesn't explain the mechanics very well and it is very frustrating; it also doesn't explain why you lost a campaign.”
- “On top of that, the tutorials are rather unhelpful; they're vague and leave the player having to deal with many of the core mechanics not being explained or even visualized at all (such as defense).”
- “Some of its mechanics are unclear.”
story
49 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
76%
10%
The game's story is centered around over 80 historically inspired missions that provide an engaging narrative, though players often find the mission objectives vague and the difficulty spikes challenging, particularly in later stages. While the strategic gameplay is praised, many users express frustration with the need for clearer instructions and the perceived pay-to-win elements that hinder progress. Overall, the storyline is compelling, but improvements in mission clarity and balance are needed to enhance the experience.
- “Intelligent story and gameplay!”
- “The strategy in this game is unreal and there are so many missions!”
- “It's a great timewaster and can keep you entertained for a while, and has a lot of campaign missions if you're up for it.”
- “However, some missions I have done, I have no idea what I'm doing.”
- “The only real drawbacks are no multiplayer and the upgrade system requires farming, and troops require upgrades to 5-star missions; thus there is a need to farm the same mission repeatedly.”
- “Love the game but the only problem I have is missions like the Battle of Three Emperors for Imperial Eagle. I am trying to do this mission set to get to the American campaign, but these missions are way too hard and the commanders for the enemy are overpowered.”
monetization
25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
24%
52%
24%
The monetization aspect of the game is generally viewed positively due to the absence of forced ads and minimal pay-to-win elements, allowing players to enjoy the game without significant financial investment. However, many users express frustration over lost in-app purchases when switching devices, high prices for in-game items, and the occasional presence of political ads, which detracts from the overall experience. While the game can be played for free, some players feel that a one-time purchase option would be more appealing than the current in-app purchase model.
- “It has great mechanics, and the best part about it: it has no ads!”
- “Overall can be played without paying, no ads if you don't want to see them.”
- “There is a minimal, and optional amount of in-app purchases.”
- “I had to change my phone and redownload the app, but all my in-app purchases had disappeared.”
- “Had to switch phones (which is a pretty common procedure) and all of my in-app purchases are gone.”
- “The overall price of in-game purchases is extremely high.”
grinding
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and time-consuming, particularly due to the necessity of destroying every enemy unit and repeatedly farming missions for upgrades and resources. While some acknowledge that the farming can be engaging, the overall sentiment leans towards it being a frustrating experience that detracts from the enjoyment of the game.
- “Also, enemies build a ridiculous amount of forts, and since you literally have to destroy every enemy unit to win, it is extremely tedious.”
- “Decent but heavily tedious and time-consuming...”
- “The only real drawbacks are no multiplayer and the upgrade system requires farming, and troops require upgrades to 5-star missions; thus, there is a need to farm the same mission repeatedly.”
replayability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
40%
Players consistently highlight the game's high replayability, noting its engaging difficulty progression and enjoyable conquest mode. The strategic depth and variety of small nations to play enhance long-term enjoyment, making it a fun experience that encourages multiple playthroughs. Additionally, excellent customer support contributes positively to the overall replay value.
- “Fun game with long-term replay value and excellent customer support.”
- “Fun, in-depth strategy with consistent difficulty progression, high replay value, and an awesome conquest mode.”
- “Very replayable.”
- “The small nations in conquest are playable.”
- “Way more playable difficulty-wise.”
humor
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
25%
The humor in the game is generally well-received, with many players finding it entertaining and enjoyable. However, there are mixed opinions, as some users feel the game lacks humor and is not winnable. Overall, the comedic elements seem to resonate positively with a significant portion of the audience.
- “It's a great game; it's funny and has gatling guns and armored cars, something that didn't exist until the 1800s. It's a good game, though.”
- “Very funny; I love it.”
- “It's a very funny game; I love it.”
- “Not funny, also not winnable.”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
67%
The stability of the game has received mixed feedback, with some users reporting bugs and glitches, particularly related to gameplay mechanics and AI behavior. However, others have experienced no significant issues, indicating that stability may vary among players. Overall, while there are notable concerns, many still find the game enjoyable despite these problems.
- “No glitches for me so far.”
- “The game runs smoothly without any crashes.”
- “I've experienced consistent performance throughout my playtime.”
- “Unbalanced gameplay (read other reviews); bugs and glitches make it very historically inaccurate.”
- “It's good, but a little buggy. When I play as Egypt, the game won't let me build forts and batteries even if I have all the resources required. Plus, the AI is kind of dumb, but all in all, this is a great game!”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players appreciate the game's atmosphere for its friendly and welcoming environment, noting that it strikes a good balance by not being overly monetized. This contributes to an enjoyable and immersive experience.
- “The atmosphere in this game is incredibly immersive, making you feel like you're truly part of the world.”
- “I love the player-friendly atmosphere; it's not overly monetized, just the right balance.”
- “The game's ambiance is captivating, drawing you in with its stunning visuals and sound design.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The optimization of the game has been criticized for its inconsistent performance across different nationalities, with users reporting significant lag and frame rate drops. Many attribute these issues to inadequate server support and regional disparities in hardware compatibility. Overall, the game's optimization appears to require further refinement to ensure a smoother experience for all players.
- “The game's optimization is a mess, leading to frequent frame drops and stuttering during gameplay.”
- “I can't believe how poorly optimized this game is; it struggles to maintain a stable frame rate even on high-end hardware.”
- “The lack of optimization makes it nearly unplayable at times, with long loading times and constant lag.”

Skip Game Offers

Buy European War 4: Napoleon

9h Median play time

9h Average play time

9-9h Spent by most gamers

*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs

Skip Games Like European War 4: Napoleon

83%10kreviews

World Conqueror 3-WW2 Strategy

Strategy

76%7.6kreviews

World Conqueror 4-WW2 Strategy

Strategy

94%5kreviews

European War 7: Medieval

Casual Strategy

74%2.5kreviews

European War 6: 1804 -Napoleon

Strategy

75%1.5kreviews

European War 5:Empire-Strategy

Strategy

More games like European War 4: Napoleon

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

European War 4: Napoleon is a casual strategy game.

European War 4: Napoleon is available on Phone, iPad, iPhone, Tablet and others.

On average players spend around 9 hours playing European War 4: Napoleon.

European War 4: Napoleon was released on May 28, 2014.

European War 4: Napoleon was developed by EasyTech Games.

European War 4: Napoleon has received positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its monetization.

European War 4: Napoleon is a single player game.

Similar games include World Conqueror 3-WW2 Strategy, World Conqueror 4-WW2 Strategy, European War 7: Medieval, European War 6: 1804 -Napoleon, European War 5:Empire-Strategy and others.

European War 4: Napoleon

Platforms

About

Buy European War 4: Napoleon