Digger Online

About

Digger Online is a single player and multiplayer open world action adventure game with a fantasy theme. It was developed by DiggerGames and was released on June 2, 2015. It received negative reviews from players.

Digger Online is a free-to-play online multiplayer game where players control digging machines to collect resources and battle opponents. The game features various modes, including deathmatch and team-based objectives, with a focus on strategy and skill. With a variety of upgrades and customization options, players can enhance their digging machines and outmaneuver their enemies in this unique action-packed experience.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

29%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,153 reviews

graphics6 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

The game has nostalgic value for many players who enjoyed it in the past.
The community is described as awesome and supportive, making it fun to interact with others.
Some players find the game enjoyable for its casual building and sandbox elements.

The game has been criticized for being a poorly executed Minecraft clone with many bugs.
Most of the game is in Russian, making it difficult for non-Russian speakers to understand and enjoy.
The transition to a paid model has frustrated many players, as it was previously free-to-play with microtransactions.

gameplay
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
62%
19%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with some praising its fluid mechanics and potential for modernization, while others criticize it as a poorly executed clone of Minecraft, lacking depth and engagement. Many players express frustration over the heavy reliance on microtransactions to unlock essential gameplay features, and the absence of a tutorial or clear instructions further detracts from the experience. Overall, the game appears unfinished and fails to deliver a compelling gameplay experience compared to its competitors.
- “The mechanics are borderline perfect and the gameplay is fluid.”
- “A++++ gameplay”
- “Best game, nice gameplay, ultra graphics.”
- “The store description alone is already horrendously broken, which is quite scary seeing we haven't even gotten to the actual gameplay yet.”
- “This game in its current state lacks a lot of gameplay elements that its competitors have.”
- “It didn't take me very long to quit; the lack of gameplay was great and the lack of quality was just too much to handle.”
graphics
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
32%
42%
26%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some praising the chibi art style and smooth visuals, while others criticize them as basic, unoriginal, and reminiscent of Minecraft. Many users express disappointment, noting that the in-game graphics do not live up to the expectations set by the trailer, leading to an overall perception of inconsistency in quality.
- “Unbelievable game physics and graphics made my eyes and heart shine.”
- “Best game, nice gameplay, ultra graphics.”
- “Charming graphics.”
- “Terrible graphics, terrible fps, terrible everything.”
- “Graphics are a rip off of Minecraft like every other mobile game; a tip to devs: get off of Steam and go somewhere for better games.”
- “The graphics are basic and not too surprising.”
story
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
28%
43%
The game's story is highlighted as a standout feature, particularly the narrative of Michael and his girlfriend Josh, which adds depth compared to typical Minecraft clones. However, some users criticize the overall lack of story and atmosphere, suggesting that the game fails to deliver a compelling narrative experience.
- “The only difference is that this game has more story to it and more depth.”
- “A++++ storyline”
- “Though it might be a Minecraft knockoff with a lack of anything you can do, the best part of the game was Michael and his story of meeting his girlfriend Josh.”
- “Only about 4 to 0 people play this game; there is no story whatsoever, and there is no atmosphere at all. This game was also mis-tagged.”
- “2: Minecraft clone; it's not even a mediocre Minecraft clone such as Block Story.”
stability
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is severely criticized, with users reporting frequent crashes, missing game files, and a non-functional launch experience. Many describe it as "buggy" and plagued by server issues, leading to a frustrating gameplay experience. Overall, the game's stability is considered poor, making it difficult for players to enjoy.
- “Just the other day I tried to play the game again, and it no longer works. It's not in a glitchy or buggy way, more like a game files are missing kind of way. All that happens is the screen goes black. If you had asked me back when the game worked, I would have said if you have friends, the game might have been fun for a bit. But after coming back to the completely broken game, I would have to say this isn't a game anyone should have to, or want to play.”
- “Oh yeah, also the game doesn't even launch and it just glitches out.”
- “It was free, and it's very buggy. Half the time it crashes.”
humor
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is described as initially entertaining, particularly in multiplayer settings, but tends to wear off quickly. Players find amusement in the absurdity of character designs and chaotic interactions, though some reviews suggest that the humor can be hit-or-miss and may not sustain long-term enjoyment. Overall, it offers a mix of hilarity and frustration, especially in social play.
- “Don't be fooled by the funny looking characters.”
- “Okay, after all these years, it’s time to update my 'very funny' positive review about this game.”
- “It's a funny game!”
monetization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The monetization model of the game heavily relies on microtransactions, which many users find excessive and detrimental to the overall experience. While it is typical for free-to-play games to include such features, players feel that the game's enjoyment is significantly hindered by the need to spend money to access essential content. Overall, the reliance on microtransactions has led to widespread dissatisfaction among users.
- “If this game wasn't so dependent on microtransactions to actually enjoy the game, it might have been alright.”
- “Realizes this game sucks because you don't actually have to gather materials to build and you have infinite materials; the rest of them you get to buy using microtransactions.”
- “In order to get blocks, players have to pay coins, and to do that, they must complete achievements, sell items, or use microtransactions. This is expected from a free-to-play game, but it's not even worth the price of free.”
- “Do not get this crap fest. When I got it, it was free, and now I see people being forced to fork over tens of dollars for microtransactions!”
- “In order to get blocks, players have to pay coins, and to earn those coins, you have to complete achievements, sell items, or use microtransactions. This is expected from a free-to-play game, but it's not even worth the price of free; they should pay you for getting the game.”
- “There are too many microtransactions.”
grinding
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews indicate that grinding in games like Farming Simulator can be frustrating, with players expressing disappointment over the tedious nature of earning in-game currency and the reliance on real money for better equipment. The grind is often seen as excessive, particularly when it comes to making money and acquiring upgrades.
- “Completely disappointed I bought Farming Simulator.”
- “Unless you are a fan of grinding every day.”
- “Making money is extremely tedious considering how expensive everything is.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
25%
50%
The music aspect received mixed reviews, with one user rating it poorly at 2/10 due to a lack of music, while another praised specific songs like the national anthem and "Team America," giving it a perfect score of 10/10 for their enjoyment. Overall, the feedback suggests that while some users appreciated certain tracks, the overall musical experience was lacking.
- “10/10 would play the national anthem and the Team America song again.”
- “Sounds and music - 2/10”
- “There is also no music.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The atmosphere of the game is widely criticized, with users noting a complete lack of immersive elements or engaging storytelling. Many feel that the game fails to create any meaningful atmosphere, describing it as a poorly executed attempt to monetize a subpar experience. Overall, the game's environment is seen as uninspired and devoid of any compelling qualities.
- “Only about 4 to 0 people play this game; there is no story whatsoever, and there is no atmosphere at all. This game was also mis-tagged.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players report a strong emotional impact from the game, with many expressing that it moved them to tears and left them feeling depressed. Overall, the emotional experience is significant, with a mix of sadness and resonance that players are willing to revisit.
- “7/10 would cry again”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The optimization of the game has been criticized for its poor performance, leading to a frustrating experience for players. Many users find the game's performance lacking, which detracts from overall enjoyment.
- “Got myself into a game, very poor performance and boring game.”
- “Got myself into a game, very poor performance and boring game.”
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers appreciate the character development in the game, highlighting the cute design of both pets and players, which enhances the overall charm and engagement of the characters.