Deuterium Wars

Multiplayer cross-platform 2D shooter that combines high dynamics of battles with a flexible role-playing system. Work your way from a rookie on a "rusty trough" to an experienced pilot of a high-tech combat aircraft equipped with a variety of deadly gadgets. A variety of combat modes, futuristic arenas, multi-level crafting, developed trade and a social eco-system will not let you get bored for a…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Reviews

69%

Audience ScoreBased on 198 reviews

gameplay11 positive mentions

monetization3 negative mentions

The game features fast-paced and enjoyable gameplay with a variety of weapons and customization options.
Players appreciate the active developers who respond to feedback and frequently update the game.
Despite its flaws, many find the game fun and addictive, especially when played with friends.

The game is unplayable due to the servers being shut down, leaving players stuck on loading screens.
There are significant pay-to-win elements and a confusing crafting system that detracts from the overall experience.
Many matches are filled with bots instead of real players, leading to a lack of genuine multiplayer interaction.

gameplay
21 mentions
52 % positive mentions
33 % neutral mentions
14 % negative mentions
Overall, the gameplay is described as responsive and entertaining, with a solid loop and enjoyable mechanics that evoke comparisons to classic titles like Soldat. However, many players express frustration with the presence of microtransactions and paywalls that hinder progress, despite acknowledging the fun and addictive nature of the gameplay. While some reviews highlight the depth and variety in game mechanics, others feel that the experience is ultimately marred by monetization issues.
- “Not only is the gameplay smooth and fun, but even when you are in the hangar, you have cool options with crafting, changing equipment skins, and more!”
- “Great addictive gameplay; I would totally recommend it to at least give it a try.”
- “Deuterium Wars features intense gameplay, great music, plenty of build variety, and most importantly, no pay-to-win aspects that I'm aware of.”
- “Mildly interesting until you start playing the game and realize the interesting part is a lie and it has as many flaws as Thanos' plotline. The music sounds like Soldat, the gameplay looks like it plays like Soldat, but the game does not in any way resemble the crowned opus, nor does it even sniff upon its boots.”
- “Same tired old paywall limiting mechanics that cripple progress unless you pay.”
- “The gameplay and premise don't seem terrible, but it's microtransacted its way into my micro recycle bin, and it's to return.”
graphics
13 mentions
38 % positive mentions
38 % neutral mentions
23 % negative mentions
Overall, the graphics received mixed reviews, with some players praising the art style and optimization, while others criticized the visuals as low-quality and in need of significant improvement. Many noted issues with clarity, such as difficulty distinguishing between walls and passages, suggesting that the graphics feel unfinished or in a beta state. Despite these criticisms, a few users found the graphics adequate for gameplay, highlighting a divide in player experiences.
- “The artwork is beautifully crafted.”
- “Good graphics and very neat optimized controller support.”
- “Graphics: 10/10”
- “Very slow tutorial and the graphics look like they are all one plane.”
- “Visuals need a full-fledged overhaul.”
- “There is some low-quality appearance in the graphics that I can't quite describe, giving a hollow and unrealistic look that I don't know how can be fixed.”
music
13 mentions
62 % positive mentions
15 % neutral mentions
23 % negative mentions
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising it as a standout feature that enhances the gameplay experience, describing it as "kick-ass" and "badass." However, others criticize it as repetitive and unoriginal, likening it to lesser titles. Overall, while many players find the soundtrack enjoyable and fitting for the game's action, there are notable dissenting opinions regarding its quality.
- “Love the music and the tactical combat.”
- “Soundtrack is badass, gotta say, the best thing this game offers, makes the game stupid fun.”
- “Interesting soundtrack that throbs when you are fighting.”
- “Horrible rock style repetitive music.”
- “The music sounds like Soldat, the gameplay looks like it plays like Soldat, but the game does not in any way resemble the crowned opus, nor does it even sniff upon its boots.”
- “The music is mildly interesting until you start playing the game and realize the interesting part is a lie and it has as many flaws as Thanos' plotline.”
story
6 mentions
50 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
50 % negative mentions
The story aspect of the game is primarily driven by daily missions and events, which enhance gameplay but are limited in number, especially for lower-level players. While the missions provide an adrenaline rush in 5 vs. 5 matches, the reliance on bots in the absence of a robust player base can detract from the experience. Overall, players find the story engaging but feel it could benefit from more content and player interaction.
- “The story unfolds beautifully, with each mission adding depth to the characters and the world.”
- “The narrative is engaging, making you feel invested in the outcomes of the missions.”
- “I love how the story integrates with the gameplay, creating a seamless experience that keeps you hooked.”
- “There are missions but not many right now; I only have 2 with many that are locked. I guess I need to wait for higher levels or until they unlock them soon.”
- “Whether the player base sticks around to actually support it, however, is another story.”
- “(Being unaware of missions and not doing them on my spare days, in my case, it only settled after level 22+, i.e., 3rd day+)”
monetization
4 mentions
0 % positive mentions
25 % neutral mentions
75 % negative mentions
The monetization aspect of the game is mixed; while some players appreciate that everything can be obtained through gameplay without pay-to-win mechanics, others criticize the overcomplicated crafting system and microtransactions that detract from the overall experience.
- “This is an example of a good idea and partially good execution, but the game is ruined with the overcomplicated crafting system and microtransactions.”
- “A massive crafting system that serves as the monetization engine.”
- “Fun gameplay is completely ruined by microtransactions here.”
grinding
2 mentions
0 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
100 % negative mentions
Many users find the grinding aspect of the game excessively punishing and unbalanced, leading to a frustrating experience that detracts from overall enjoyment. As a result, players recommend avoiding the game, especially if they prefer fair and rewarding gameplay.
- “All in all, I don't recommend it because when I play a free game, I expect it to be fair and rewarding, not extremely grindy and punishing if you play it a lot. So if you are like me, stay away.”
humor
2 mentions
100 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is widely praised, with players finding it both hilarious and reminiscent of classic 2D shooters. Veterans of the genre feel a strong sense of nostalgia and connection, enhancing the comedic experience.
- “A funny old-school 2D shooter.”
- “The game is funny as hell; every veteran will feel at home from the get-go.”
optimization
1 mentions
300 % positive mentions
-200 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
The game features impressive graphics and well-optimized controller support, enhancing the overall user experience.
- “The graphics are impressive, and the controller support is very well optimized.”
- “The game runs smoothly with excellent optimization for both graphics and controls.”
- “I appreciate the attention to detail in the optimization, making the gameplay experience seamless.”