Danger Zone

Starting at €11.99Buy now

Get on Steam

Get on Xbox Games Store

In "Danger Zone," players navigate a high-speed crash test facility, deploying explosives to create massive chain reactions and cause maximum destruction. With a variety of vehicles and objectives, the goal is to earn style points and rack up high scores. It's a thrilling, action-packed experience for fans of destruction derbies and stunt driving.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Reviews

67%

Audience ScoreBased on 126 reviews

gameplay positive mentions

story negative mentions

Danger Zone captures the nostalgic feel of Burnout's Crash Mode, providing satisfying destruction and chaos.
The game is visually appealing with great particle effects and runs smoothly on various hardware.
It's an addictive experience that encourages players to improve their scores and replay levels for better medals.

The game suffers from a lack of variety, with only one environment and limited vehicle options, making it feel repetitive.
Controls and camera mechanics are frustrating, leading to a less enjoyable gameplay experience.
The damage model is simplistic, lacking the depth and realism expected from a game focused on car crashes.

gameplay
23 mentions
9 % positive mentions
87 % neutral mentions
4 % negative mentions
The gameplay has been described as a mixed experience, with some players enjoying the mechanics reminiscent of classic Burnout games, particularly the crash mode. However, criticisms include a lack of camera control, shallow vehicle damage, repetitive missions, and a limited environment that detracts from overall enjoyment. While there is potential for a more engaging experience, many feel the game feels unfinished and lacks depth and variety.
- “I see a lot of potential in this game, although I would like some more crumpled car physics, but for now the gameplay is pretty solid so far.”
- “Loving this game and its Burnout crash mode gameplay.”
- “While it's a shame the entire game takes place in a 'training facility' rather than open and varied environments, the mechanics are still sound and quite fun.”
- “The camera cannot be manipulated while driving and is at a very low angle, making the very vertical levels an utter gamble as to whether you are going where you need to go. The destruction of vehicles is very unfulfilling as it is only texture damage, with no warping of the models to really feel the impacts. There is no music, and the game is short with only one mechanic ripped straight out of Burnout.”
- “Every mission in the game assigns you the car you're using, and there are no mechanics or systems that allow you to improve or customize anything.”
- “For me, this game has no character and no proper replayability, as the scenarios you play in are really boring and lack any fun from a gameplay and design perspective.”
graphics
17 mentions
24 % positive mentions
71 % neutral mentions
6 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some praising the visual effects and lighting, particularly highlighting the use of Unreal Engine 4 for its particle effects and overall aesthetic. However, others criticize the graphics as bland and lacking depth, feeling that the virtual training simulation style detracts from the game's vibrancy. Overall, while there are notable strengths in certain areas, the graphical quality appears inconsistent and polarizing among players.
- “The graphics are great thanks to UE4; explosion and fire effects look great, and vehicle handling has a very Burnout-like feel to it.”
- “The game was developed using Unreal Engine 4, and it shows: the graphics are gritty with a lot of particle effects on screen.”
- “Since the original release, the developers updated the graphics and added a lot more levels.”
- “Graphically, very very bland, ugly even (for an UE4 title, never thought I'd say that) as it's just very flat; even explosions and fire do not look UE4 quality.”
- “I get that it's because this is all part of a virtual training simulation aesthetic, but that aesthetic robs this game of any life in my opinion.”
- “Evident from the requirements (and visuals, I guess) it's not very optimized, but I think it lives up to it with its looks.”
music
14 mentions
21 % positive mentions
71 % neutral mentions
7 % negative mentions
The game has received significant criticism for its complete lack of music, with players noting that the absence of a soundtrack detracts from the overall experience. Instead, the game is filled with only sound effects from crashing and driving, which many find unfulfilling and monotonous. Reviewers express disappointment, especially given the game's potential for a more engaging audio atmosphere.
- “I just like the song by Kenny Loggins.”
- “This is a game with no music.”
- “And the music... there is none!”
- “Not only that, but there is no music in the game whatsoever, so only the noise of screeching wheels and revving engines fills the game.”
- “But alas, it is not... this game has zero music.”
- “The menus, cars, lack of any music or any meaningful damage, the game is just boring to look at and play.”
optimization
7 mentions
57 % positive mentions
43 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
Overall, the game's optimization is generally praised, with many users noting smooth performance, impressive visuals, and minimal loading times. While some mention that it may not be highly optimized based on system requirements, the majority agree that it runs well and delivers a visually appealing experience. Ratings for optimization are notably high, with some users giving it an 8/10.
- “The game runs smoothly and the visual effects look great.”
- “Very well optimized game with lots of eye candy and particles.”
- “No problems with performance and loading times, either.”
- “Evident from the requirements (and visuals, I guess) it's not very optimized, but I think it lives up to it with its looks.”
- “No problems with performance and loading times, either.”
- “Optimization and PC settings are lacking.”
story
3 mentions
0 % positive mentions
67 % neutral mentions
33 % negative mentions
The game's story is criticized for its lack of depth and engagement, with missions feeling shallow and unexciting. Players are restricted to predetermined vehicles without any customization options, which detracts from the overall narrative experience.
- “Every mission in the game assigns you the car you're using, and there are no mechanics or systems that allow you to improve or customize anything.”
- “Further, each little mission or set piece seems lacking depth and fun.”
replayability
3 mentions
67 % positive mentions
33 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
Players find the game highly replayable, offering multiple chapters and vehicles that encourage repeated play to achieve high scores and collect medals. The engaging arcade mechanics and addictive crash physics further enhance the replay value, making it a fun experience worth revisiting.
- “For $10, you get three chapters with half a dozen vehicles, but there's lots of replayability.”
- “The game is replayable for achieving high scores on the leaderboards.”
- “Super fun arcade game with amazing scrap physics, addictive crash puzzling, and loads of replayability to earn the highest medals.”
- “The game is replayable to achieve high scores on the leaderboards.”
- “Once you complete the main story, there’s little incentive to play again.”
- “The lack of varied endings makes replaying the game feel pointless.”
stability
3 mentions
67 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
33 % negative mentions
The game demonstrates excellent stability, running smoothly without stutters or significant graphical issues, even on lower-end hardware. Players report consistent performance, achieving 30 to 60 FPS at maximum settings, making it a reliable choice for those seeking a seamless gaming experience.
- “It runs great on an Intel HD4600 - with all settings on max at 1920x1080, I get between 30 and 60 FPS.”
- “Haven't gotten a huge amount of playtime with the game, but it plays exactly like Burnout 3's crash mode, runs great, and is going to be quite a time sink for me.”
humor
3 mentions
100 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is largely attributed to its exaggerated physics and entertaining AI behavior, which creates amusing scenarios, such as cars unexpectedly hitting the ceiling. This blend of unrealistic mechanics and comedic moments contributes to an overall enjoyable experience.
- “Although the physics aren't completely realistic, it actually helps make the game enjoyable and funny.”
- “The AI makes the whole game really funny and enjoyable.”
- “It's especially funny when you see multiple cars hit the ceiling without any input from me.”
grinding
2 mentions
0 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
100 % negative mentions
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and frustrating, particularly noting that it can hinder movement and overall gameplay experience.
- “Tedious to play.”
- “It will refuse to move while it's grinding on the chassis.”
emotional
1 mentions
100 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
The emotional aspect of the game elicits strong reactions, with some players expressing intense feelings of sadness and frustration, to the point of crying. While the game clearly impacts players deeply, it also generates significant dissatisfaction, leading some to feel that the emotional toll is not justified by the experience.
- “I cried so much I have no more tears left to cry. I hate this game, but it’s not worth how much it cost. I'm going to cry some more now, not kidding, I hate this so much.”
atmosphere
1 mentions
0 % positive mentions
100 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
The atmosphere is negatively impacted by minor elements that detract from the overall experience for some users.
- “This is minor, but it still worsens the atmosphere for me.”
- “The overall ambiance feels flat and uninspired.”
- “The lack of environmental detail really detracts from the immersive experience.”