Cubic Castles

About

Cubic Castles is a multiplayer casual action adventure game. It was developed by Cosmic Cow LLC and was released on August 12, 2014. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Cubic Castles is a free-to-play voxel-based building and exploration game. Players can create their own worlds, gather resources, and build intricate structures using a variety of blocks and items. Featuring online multiplayer, players can interact, visit other players' worlds, and participate in community events. The game offers a creative outlet for players who enjoy building and exploring in a shared universe.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

71%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,956 reviews

graphics37 positive mentions

grinding67 negative mentions

graphics
89 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
42%
48%
10%
The graphics of the game are a mixed bag, with many players appreciating the charming cubic and voxel art style, which is often described as cute and appealing. However, there are frequent calls for improvements, as some users find the visuals outdated or lacking in detail compared to modern standards. Overall, while the graphics are generally considered decent and suitable for casual gameplay, there is a consensus that enhancements could significantly elevate the game's aesthetic appeal.
- “This sandbox-style game, with its charming cubic graphics and open-world exploration, has provided countless hours of fun and building with friends.”
- “It is an amazing modern-day masterpiece that showcases what modern games are capable of and the amazing graphics they can achieve.”
- “Great graphics; however, the game runs very smoothly!”
- “While the cubic art style is charming, there's ample room for improvement to make the game more visually appealing.”
- “Poor graphics, audio, and general tutorial.”
- “Instead, I got a game in 3rd person with blocky unrealistic graphics (which I was really hyped up for realistic graphics).”
story
85 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
83%
4%
The game's story aspect receives mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the emotionally engaging narrative and the inclusion of quests that enhance the gameplay experience, while others criticize the lack of depth and clarity in the storylines. Many users note that the focus is primarily on gameplay mechanics rather than a cohesive narrative, leading to a sense of repetitiveness and boredom after completing quests. Overall, while the story mode is seen as a positive addition, it often feels underdeveloped and overshadowed by gameplay elements.
- “Been playing since 2016, granted I took a long hiatus but the game only got better. Highly recommend for people that like adventure, parkour, building, and story.”
- “It not only tells an emotionally gripping story but has some of the greatest, most revolutionary, and intuitive gameplay I have ever seen.”
- “If lore is your thing, I suggest trying out the story mode.”
- “☑ no story”
- “☑ only gameplay, doesn't include a story.”
- “The story mode is quite slow and boring because of no in-game helps/hints, only web help.”
gameplay
81 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
31%
59%
10%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players enjoying the unique mechanics and crafting systems reminiscent of Minecraft, while others criticize the movement mechanics, slow progression, and connection issues. Many appreciate the perk system that enhances character abilities, but there are calls for improvements such as a world editor to foster creativity. Overall, while the game offers engaging elements, it suffers from repetitive gameplay and a lack of depth, leading to a varied player experience.
- “This game is packed with features and mechanics to always keep you interested, like farming, trading, perks, crafting, etc. My only criticism is about how slow it is to get cubits (the game's main currency) through mining, but trading can offset that sluggishness, as well as daily challenges and the free offers on the mobile version.”
- “Words simply cannot reach out far enough to express the love I have built upon this game; it has made such a strong bond between me and itself, and that's just all thanks to its incredible gameplay.”
- “The gameplay is good, the graphics are nice, and realms are customizable.”
- “This game looks like the screenshots but the gameplay and UI are terrible.”
- “Clunky design, slow gameplay, pay to win.”
- “Basic graphics, boring gameplay; I guess if I had someone to play with it would be a somewhat bearable game, but honestly, even though it's free, it doesn't mean it should be played.”
grinding
71 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
2%
94%
The grinding aspect of the game is widely criticized for being excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring players to invest significant hours to earn in-game currency (cubits) and resources. Many players feel that the grind detracts from the overall enjoyment, with some suggesting that the game leans heavily on microtransactions to alleviate the grind, creating an imbalance between paying and non-paying players. While some appreciate the social and creative elements of the game, the overwhelming consensus is that the grinding can become monotonous and frustrating, especially for those looking to build and customize their worlds.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “One long, tedious grind.”
- “Granted, there are more worlds for players, but you should add some sort of empty realm finder for the search bit in the map so finding one isn't tedious and boring.”
- “It's a grindy game that takes a long time to really get fun but seems to love forcing you to start over without any reason and no real connection to your Steam breaking often.”
- “Getting cubits and items is extremely hard; you have to wait one hour to even get a common item from farming non-stop straight!”
- “Very grindy, with lots of microtransactions to buy block textures and more territory.”
stability
39 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
3%
97%
The stability of the game has received significant criticism, with users reporting frequent glitches, crashes, and lag, particularly in the online version. Many players express frustration over the game's performance, noting issues such as freezing during loading, disconnections, and UI malfunctions. While some acknowledge that the game has potential and can be enjoyable, the overwhelming consensus is that stability needs substantial improvement to enhance the overall experience.
- “It's free, but there are no ads, and it runs great on my low-end non-gaming laptop.”
- “I played this game for a long time on my phone, but the online version is a lot more laggy and buggy whenever I close and open it.”
- “It glitches, crashes, and is just bad quality all around.”
- “The game never loads in; it only loads in the main menu, then when I try to play, it just freezes at the second loading bar.”
humor
28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
96%
4%
The humor in the game is widely appreciated, with players finding it both hilarious and cute, often highlighting funny interactions and quirky mechanics, such as the glue-eating gimmick that mutes chat. Many reviews emphasize the game's tongue-in-cheek humor and the enjoyment derived from its playful dialogue and social interactions, making it a fun experience for those who engage with its comedic elements. However, some users express frustration with the game's monetization and balance, suggesting that while the humor is a strong point, it doesn't overshadow all gameplay issues.
- “There was a funny gimmick where eating glue can basically mute your chat each time you type, you will start 'mpmhpm', which I used to annoy my friends a lot.”
- “5) has a very tongue-in-cheek sense of humor.”
- “It’s super funny and it’s so cute!”
- “I'm being completely honest, not funny or terribly serious, so take this as you will.”
monetization
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
39%
42%
The monetization aspect of the game is heavily criticized for its reliance on microtransactions, with many players labeling it a cash grab that limits gameplay without payment. While some appreciate the option to earn in-game currency through daily quests or ads, the overall sentiment is that the game feels paywalled, making it difficult to progress without spending money. Despite being free to play, the pervasive microtransaction model has led to frustration among users who feel it detracts from the overall experience.
- “It's free (even though there are in-game purchases), oh yeah, and you can get cubits for free by doing daily quests.”
- “Speaking of microtransactions, I was pleasantly surprised by how little they were shoved into my face during my first hour or so playing.”
- “Very good in-game purchase system, not forcing you to pay to win.”
- “Cubic Castles is a mobile app that's been dumped on Steam by morally bankrupt, greedy mobile devs, as a cash grab.”
- “It's a pure mobile app cash grab scam as everything is essentially paygated.”
- “An absolute cash grab, the currency is extremely rare to get and everything requires it.”
music
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The music in the game has received largely negative feedback, with users noting a lack of a proper soundtrack and ambiance, leading to a disjointed experience. Many players reported issues with sound effects that do not fit the game's style, and some experienced persistent music playing even when the app was not in use. Overall, the music aspect seems to detract from the gameplay rather than enhance it.
- “The music plays while not using the app.”
- “Overall the game's controls feel like a mobile game and the sound effects and music barely fit and don't really seem to be designed for this style of game.”
- “This game was good at first but then it started to lag the phone a ton, then the music was still playing even when I was out of the site.”
- “There is no music (soundtrack, ambiance...) in the game.”
- “Overall, the game's controls feel like a mobile game, and the sound effects and 'music' barely fit and don't really seem to be designed for this style of game.”
- “This game was good at first, but then it started to lag the phone a ton, and the music was still playing even when I was out of the app.”
optimization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
Overall, the game's performance is generally praised, especially considering its age, with frequent updates contributing to smooth gameplay for most users. However, some players experience control optimization issues on certain devices, particularly with joystick placement and camera movement limitations.
- “Updates are frequent, and the game tends to run smoothly (depending on your internet strength).”
- “Game runs smoothly and most players seem to be very friendly.”
- “The one thing I'll praise the game on is its performance, but this is expected with a game that's almost a decade old.”
- “I hope this game gets an optimization update in the future to earn a better title.”
- “The game controls are not well optimized for some phones like mine. The joystick is too close to the edge, and you can't move while changing your camera angle. Other than the controls, it has something going for it.”
emotional
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the game emotionally impactful, praising its gripping narrative and innovative gameplay. However, experiences of heartbreak and frustration, particularly related to scams within the game, have led to significant emotional distress for some users. Overall, while the game elicits strong positive feelings, it also exposes players to negative experiences that can deeply affect their enjoyment.
- “It not only tells an emotionally gripping story but has some of the greatest, most revolutionary, and intuitive gameplay I have ever seen.”
- “This was heart-breaking, and I quit after trying to salvage what little was left.”
- “I cried when I got banned, but I emailed them and they got me back in. You should actually get this game, no joke.”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
The atmosphere of the game is described as cutesy, but it can be disrupted by a sense of mistrust among players, leading to a constant need for vigilance. This unexpected tension contrasts with the otherwise enjoyable environment.
- “It wasn't what I was expecting; it had a cutesy atmosphere, though.”
- “It wasn't what I was expecting; it had a cutesy atmosphere, which felt out of place.”
- “The atmosphere felt flat and uninspired, lacking any real depth or immersion.”
- “I found the overall ambiance to be dull and uninviting, failing to draw me into the game.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game has been criticized for its lack of replay value, with users rating its replayability as low as 2 out of 10. This suggests that once completed, players may not find sufficient incentive to revisit the game.
- “No replay value.”
- “[b] Replayability: [/b] [i] 2/10 [/i]”