Skip to main content
Crystal of Atlan Game Cover

About

Crystal of Atlan is a multiplayer role playing game. It was developed by Nuverse Pte.Ltd. and was released on October 30, 2025. It received neutral reviews from players.

Crystal of Atlan is a magicpunk MMO action RPG featuring high-speed 3D combat that seamlessly blends ground and aerial combos. Players engage in dynamic battles with fast-paced combos, tactical dodging, and environmental interactions, creating a visually stunning and skill-driven experience. Its fair PvP system emphasizes mastery, timing, and teamwork in competitive 1v1 and 3v3 matches.

Skip User Reviews

58%
Audience ScoreBased on 125 reviews
gameplay10 positive mentions
story4 negative mentions

  • The game features beautiful graphics and enjoyable combat mechanics, making for a visually appealing and engaging experience.
  • Players can enjoy a fun and casual gameplay experience, especially in the early stages, with a variety of classes and abilities to explore.
  • The PvP system is well-designed, allowing for competitive play without the need for heavy spending, making it accessible for free-to-play players.
  • The game has a heavily pay-to-win structure, requiring significant financial investment to remain competitive, especially in endgame content.
  • An aggressive energy system limits playtime, forcing players to wait or spend money to continue progressing, which can be frustrating.
  • The game suffers from repetitive gameplay and a lack of meaningful social interaction, making it feel more like a grind than a true MMO experience.
  • gameplay
    18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is generally praised for its beautiful graphics, engaging combat mechanics, and smooth PvP system, offering a fun experience with combo skills and boss mechanics. However, some players criticize the social features as ineffective and the overall gameplay as restrictive and unintuitive, with interruptions that detract from immersion. While the game has potential for great combat, it falls short in execution, leading to mixed feelings among players.

    • “Amazing combat mechanics.”
    • “Gameplay itself is very good, and the system in place for PvP is really good given how corrupt the PvE system is.”
    • “Great gameplay in general (ability to juggle enemies and combo skills well, with a smooth dodge mechanic).”
    • “It's on pretty restrictive rails when it comes to gameplay.”
    • “No, you can get hit rather often and still get a triple SSS and kill everybody. The problem is that 'clean' gameplay is needlessly unintuitive to achieve, feeling way more hollow than how weighty the animations are by comparison. The game has every single tool to have some of the best combat in any 3rd person action MMORPG, but it's just not quite there.”
    • “This is the worst thing I have ever encountered; they constantly interrupt gameplay with annoying 'continue?' prompts.”
  • graphics
    15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game are widely praised for their beauty and detail, contributing to an enjoyable visual experience. Many users highlight the stunning visuals and appealing design, although some mention graphical bugs and performance issues. Overall, while the graphics are a strong point, they are sometimes overshadowed by gameplay mechanics and technical problems.

    • “I loved this game, beautiful graphics and exquisite mechanics. These are the only two pros I give; one more would be the auto translation of chats to your native language, supported languages.”
    • “Beautiful visuals.”
    • “Very appealing game, beautiful visuals, hyperactive gameplay, and fun HUD to use.”
    • “Only play this game if you enjoy PvP and want some solid PvP (mainly 1v1)... everything else about the game is just menus, free stuff to get your interest to maybe buy stuff, and visuals.”
    • “Fun action combat systems locked behind an aggressive energy system and graphical bugs the dev doesn't seem to want to fix.”
    • “I'm choosing aesthetics over gameplay.”
  • story
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story in the game is generally perceived as lackluster and typical of free-to-play titles, with many players skipping dialogue and feeling that it lacks depth. Players express frustration with the game's structure, which interrupts gameplay frequently to return to town, and criticize the overall narrative as uninspired and filled with bugs. While some appreciate the character design and art direction, the consensus is that the story does not significantly enhance the gaming experience.

    • “The game is fun enough to play for hours, but they scam you into thinking you can beat the main story in a day.”
    • “While I think it's nice to not have a blank slate protagonist, the story isn't all that amazing anyway.”
    • “This game has been re-released for us, and after being out for months now, there are still tons of bugs in the standard story and new events.”
  • grinding
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and repetitive, often feeling lonely due to a lack of communication among players who are focused on grinding. While some enjoy grind-heavy games, many express frustration with the mandatory alt system and the slow pace of progression, which can make the experience feel like a chore rather than an engaging challenge. Additionally, the game's heavy reliance on pay-to-win mechanics exacerbates the grind, leading to a sense of boredom and dissatisfaction.

    • “The biggest downside is the alt system; it becomes a chore, and they should make grinding faster.”
    • “Grindy and repetitive when free to play, requiring you to play on alts if you even remotely want to keep up.”
    • “Which leads to grinding even the most uninteresting encounters just to make it feel less like RNG, or play passively, which is just boring.”
  • character development
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Character development is praised for its diversity, offering a range of designs that appeal to various player preferences, moving beyond typical archetypes.

    • “There is a character design for everyone, not just stereotypical options.”
    • “The depth of character development allows players to truly connect with their avatars.”
    • “Each character's backstory is rich and adds layers to the overall narrative.”
    • “The character development feels shallow and lacks meaningful progression.”
    • “I found the characters to be one-dimensional and their arcs predictable.”
    • “There is little to no emotional investment in the characters due to poor writing.”
  • optimization
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, the game's optimization is generally praised for its simplicity and straightforwardness; however, players report issues with low framerates and stuttering, particularly in fullscreen mode on ultrawide displays. Additionally, there are concerns about the reward system in raids, which feels disconnected from player performance.

    • “Simple, optimized, straightforward.”
    • “Low framerates and stuttering issues for ultrawide in fullscreen.”
    • “You go to raids, and regardless of your own performance, it doesn't mean anything to what you get as the rewards, which is almost nothing.”
  • monetization
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization in the game is described as aggressive and heavily influenced by eastern practices, leading to a pay-to-win environment that can be frustrating for players. While some users feel that spending is not necessary to progress, many express irritation with the paywalls and the overall cash-grab nature of the game, viewing it as a grind for virtual items that ultimately feels like a waste of money and time.

    • “The paywall crap irritates, and the percentage of upgrading gear is frustrating. Other than that, it's a decent port, but like all iOS ports, it's a cash grab irritation grindfest, massively pay-to-win, and massively wallet draining. I'm only playing it until the next game comes out, and then I'll ditch this. I'm not blowing a ton of money on it; virtual item cash drains are a waste of money and time.”
    • “Now, let’s talk about monetization — because this game is extremely aggressive in that regard.”
    • “It has eastern monetization, but that has not been at all needed to get to where I am, nor do I feel underpowered.”
  • music
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is generally well-received, with standout main tracks that enhance the experience, though some world and scenario music is considered generic. While the overall sound design contributes positively to gameplay, the mission complete fanfare is humorously criticized for its lack of quality.

    • “Good game, my way is very relaxed, good music, good gameplay, and you can play with the controller.”
    • “Art direction is amazing, the music is mostly okay, the main tracks are great.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Crystal of Atlan

400h Median play time
400h Average play time
400-400h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Crystal of Atlan

Games Like Crystal of Atlan

Crystal of Atlan ImageCrystal of Atlan ImageCrystal of Atlan Image
Bless Unleashed Image
Lost Ark Image
Blue Protocol: Star Resonance Image
Closers Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Crystal of Atlan is a role playing game.

Crystal of Atlan is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 400 hours playing Crystal of Atlan.

Crystal of Atlan was released on October 30, 2025.

Crystal of Atlan was developed by Nuverse Pte.Ltd..

Crystal of Atlan has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its story.

Crystal of Atlan is a multiplayer game with local co-op support.

Similar games include Crystal of Atlan, Bless Unleashed, Lost Ark, Blue Protocol: Star Resonance, Closers and others.