Crush the Castle Legacy Collection

About

"Crush the Castle Legacy Collection" is a physics destruction game that includes all levels from the original Crush the Castle series. With upscaled graphics and new achievements, players can topple foes and score big using various projectiles and power-ups. The collection contains over 300 levels to complete, providing hours of destructive fun.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Crush the Castle Legacy Collection screenshot

88%

Audience ScoreBased on 168 reviews

gameplay8 positive mentions

stability6 negative mentions

The collection brings back nostalgic memories of classic Flash games, making it a fun trip down memory lane for those who played them as kids.
Crush the Castle 1 and 2 are well-received for their engaging gameplay and variety of levels, with many players enjoying the challenge of achieving gold medals.
The inclusion of player packs adds extra content and replayability, enhancing the overall experience of the collection.

Crush the Castle Adventures is criticized for its frustrating gameplay, poor optimization, and lack of enjoyable mechanics compared to the first two games.
The absence of a level editor, which was a beloved feature in the original games, is a significant drawback for many players.
Several bugs and performance issues, including lag and inconsistent physics, detract from the overall enjoyment of the collection.

gameplay
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
31%
19%
The gameplay aspect of the game receives mixed reviews, with some praising its addictive nature and nostalgic appeal, while others criticize its limitations, such as predetermined ammo types and frustrating mechanics. Overall, it is described as simple yet enjoyable, offering a blend of classic fun and challenges, though some players find it lacking in depth and innovation.
- “It has the best gameplay, best art style, and is overall the most fun.”
- “Its addictive gameplay makes castle crushing an absolute blast.”
- “All in all, Crush the Castle Legacy Collection is a great game that provides hours of fun gameplay and interesting challenges.”
- “The gameplay is also terrible, not allowing you to use any ammo types other than the ones predetermined for the level, so it feels like you aren't progressing in any way.”
- “The acid flask is gone entirely, the inflatable ammo is just frustrating, and the soul reaper ammo might be the worst mechanic in the entire series.”
- “It's terrible both mechanically and gameplay-wise, the story is cringe and if I could, I would demand payment for having to play through it to complete my achievements.”
graphics
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with some praising the cartoonish art style as a fun and engaging change that enhances gameplay, while others criticize it as simplistic and unattractive. Despite the upscaled visuals, players note that the game shows its age, particularly with a framerate cap and lack of fullscreen mode. Overall, opinions vary widely, reflecting a divide between those who appreciate the new aesthetic and those who find it lacking.
- “One of the main advantages of this game is its graphics.”
- “Personally for this game, I actually really like the change in art style; not only is it still true to the original game being far more violent than what you may expect, but also how the destruction system enhances the player experience with how good it sounds to crush castles.”
- “This game absolutely shifts the game from the previous entry, not just from the obvious art style change but also how levels are laid out.”
- “The art style is atrocious, the story is annoying, it has way too many levels (many of which are glitched or just outright impossible), and it's overall way too long.”
- “This is like they saw the profits of Angry Birds and made their own pathetic attempt at replicating its art style.”
- “However, this collection has a framerate cap at around 45 fps and there isn't a true fullscreen mode. You can see the game's age despite the graphics being upscaled.”
stability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is inconsistent, with the first two levels performing well while the third level is plagued by numerous bugs and glitches that hinder gameplay. Players report frustrating issues with predetermined shot angles and problematic physics, making certain challenges nearly impossible to complete without exploiting glitches. Overall, while the earlier levels are enjoyable, the third level significantly detracts from the experience due to its instability.
- “Ctc1 and ctc2 are just as good as they were before, but ctca is a buggy mess and the very janky predetermined shot angles make it impossible to complete some stage challenges (I'm looking at you, mummy machine).”
- “Heavy metal is an annoying puzzle that you’ve already solved, but it is hard to execute with buggy physics.”
- “Game is busted; they didn't port the original from Flash correctly. Levels glitch out and become nearly impossible without brute forcing it until the game glitches in your favor.”
story
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
33%
50%
The story is widely criticized for being annoying and cringe-worthy, contributing to an overall frustrating gameplay experience. Many players find the excessive number of levels, some of which are glitched or overly difficult, to be tedious and detracting from the enjoyment of the game. Overall, the narrative fails to engage players, leading to a negative perception of the game's progression and missions.
- “The art style is atrocious, the story is annoying, it has way too many levels (many of which are glitched or just outright impossible), and it's overall way too long.”
- “It's terrible both mechanically and gameplay-wise, the story is cringe and if I could, I would demand payment for having to play through it to complete my achievements.”
- “On one hand I understand why, but on the other hand it also made some quests feel very long and frustrating at times.”
optimization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The optimization of the game is highly inconsistent, with some users reporting severe performance issues and poor optimization on PC, making it unplayable on mobile devices. In contrast, a few players noted that the game runs smoothly without any noticeable bugs or performance problems. Overall, the experience varies significantly depending on the platform.
- “Runs well, with no performance issues or bugs to speak of.”
- “Runs smooth with no noticeable performance issues.”
- “While I can't recommend the new one due to severe performance issues even on modern hardware, the four other games included are great.”
- “Frankly, you're better off playing the old Flash versions of CTC via Ruffle: the performance is no worse than this half-assed package.”
- “The game might be poorly optimized.”
- “It's really poorly optimized on PC (completely unplayable on phone), so the frame rate is all over the place.”
humor
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
25%
The humor in the game is generally well-received, with players enjoying the amusing portrayal of fragile characters in the castles. However, some criticize the shift to less appealing cartoon styles and cringe-worthy writing, which detracts from the overall comedic experience. Additionally, gameplay issues can lead to unintentionally funny moments, though they may also be frustrating.
- “The art is good and the fragile people in the castles are funny.”
- “Funny game :)”
- “There seems to be some kind of delay, and I find that sometimes my inputs are not registering at all, leading to some hilarious but annoying 'throw straight downs.'”
- “Replacing it with bad cartoons and cringe-worthy, unfunny writing was not a good decision.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's soundtrack is praised for enhancing the overall atmosphere, with users noting its quality and smooth performance without any reported issues.
- “It also has a wonderful soundtrack that adds to the atmosphere of the game.”
- “Works smoothly, the music is good and I didn't encounter any bugs.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The monetization strategy of "Crush the Castle" faced criticism after it was overshadowed by "Angry Birds," which implemented a pay-to-win model, leading to a decline in the former's popularity.
- “The monetization model feels exploitative, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending money.”
- “It seems like every feature is locked behind a paywall, which ruins the overall experience.”
- “The game is heavily focused on pay-to-win mechanics, making it frustrating for players who don't want to spend extra.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express strong disappointment with the emotional impact of the game, feeling that their investment was not justified and likening the experience to a "dumpster fire." This suggests a significant disconnect between expectations and the actual emotional engagement provided by the game.
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's atmosphere is enhanced by a wonderful soundtrack that significantly contributes to the overall experience.
- “It also has a wonderful soundtrack that adds to the atmosphere of the game.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players express a classic frustration with grinding, noting that certain levels are extremely challenging, prompting a desire to repeatedly attempt them in order to earn medals.
- “Classic frustration returns as some levels are still incredibly difficult to earn the medal for, and you just want to keep grinding to achieve it!”
- “The grinding feels endless and often tedious, making it hard to stay engaged with the game.”
- “I find myself repeating the same tasks over and over, which makes the experience feel more like a chore than fun.”