"Crows" is a first-person multiplayer game that can be played cooperatively with up to 2 players, or competitively with a randomly selected saboteur among the team. The game follows the story of a mafia boss's son who hides his father's valuable artifacts in the forest, leading to a race between the mafia team and a traitor to retrieve them. The goal is to access the mafia's fortune before the other party, adding a strategic and tense element to the gameplay.
Easy achievements, with some players finding humor in the game's absurdity.
The graphics looked good initially, and some players found the gameplay fascinating.
The game is riddled with bugs, making it unplayable and frustrating.
There is no single player content, and the multiplayer experience is dead with no active player base.
The controls are poorly designed, leading to a frustrating gameplay experience with clipping and movement issues.
gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
25%
50%
Gameplay reviews are mixed, with some users praising it as "fascinating" and highlighting the excellent sound design, while others criticize the moving mechanics as "garbage" and "horrible." Overall, the gameplay experience seems to be polarizing, with strong opinions on both sides.
“The gameplay is positively fascinating, and I suggest you check it out for yourself.”
“The sound in this game is just so good, and the gameplay is way too good.”
“The moving mechanics are garbage!”
“Moving mechanics were horrible.”
“The gameplay is positively 'fascinating' and I suggest you check it out for yourself.”
story
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The game's story is criticized for being minimal and poorly developed, relying heavily on PvP elements instead of providing a rich single-player experience with engaging storytelling and NPCs. Reviewers note that the lack of depth and content has led to a lack of interest from players, with the introductory segment being the only narrative offered.
“The intro is all the story or information you will receive.”
“Hardly a success story; gamers just weren't all that interested in the game.”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization practices of the developers have been heavily criticized for being unethical, as they allegedly engage in plagiarism by using uncredited assets from other creators, leading to accusations of cash grab tactics and low-quality releases. This pattern of behavior raises concerns about the integrity of their offerings on platforms like Steam.
“The developers here didn't credit any of the artists and real, actual game developers who created the assets, so this is plagiarism, as well as a cash grab.”
“The Labory/sa industry has shown a repeat pattern of unethically dumping other people's work onto Steam as a cheap, nasty cash grab through this account or closely linked/alternate accounts.”
graphics
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The graphics are generally well-received, with users noting that they look good and contribute positively to the overall experience of the game.
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the game's humor to stem from its chaotic and buggy nature, often describing the experience as unexpectedly entertaining, especially given its low price point.
“The game is a confusing buggy mess... but for 50 cents, it was quite a hilarious thing to experience.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is plagued by numerous bugs and stability issues, leading to a chaotic experience for players. However, some users find the humorous aspects of the glitches redeeming, especially given the low price point of 50 cents.