Corrupt - Political Simulator | Game Brain

Corrupt - Political Simulator Game Cover

About

Corrupt - Political Simulator is a single player casual sport game. It was developed by Atomic Fabrik and was released on September 15, 2017. It received neutral reviews from players.

Have you ever wanted to be in charge as either the President or the Underworld Boss of your country? Why not both? Corrupt - Political Simulator is the answer you’ve been waiting for! Your wildest dreams will become reality in this political strategy and simulation game that shall introduce you into the evershifting maze that is the world known to a corrupt oligarch. Yet in order to claw your …

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Corrupt - Political Simulator screenshot

Skip User Reviews

50%

Audience ScoreBased on 40 reviews

graphics3 negative mentions

Interesting economic and political simulation with strategic elements involving corruption, money laundering, and influence over city institutions.
Addictive gameplay for some players who appreciate the challenge of managing resources and maintaining control over the city.
Good concept and simple but intuitive visuals that allow players to quickly understand gameplay mechanics.

Extremely repetitive gameplay focused on excessive clicking with no idle or automation features, causing player fatigue.
Numerous bugs and lack of polish, including poor UI design, unclear instructions, frequent technical issues, and unrealistic share price mechanics.
Low-quality graphics, a poor tutorial, missing features such as achievements, and an overall unprofessional presentation resembling an asset flip.

graphics
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
28%
43%
The graphics are generally considered poor and simplistic, often described as low-quality or prototype-level, with occasional bugs. While visuals may be cute or adequate for the game's style, they lack polish and do not significantly enhance the gameplay experience.
- “A good police simulator, but the graphics are not the best; nevertheless, the game will not let you get bored.”
- “Visuals are cute.”
- “The graphics look like what you'd find in an early prototype, and the bugs are everywhere.”
- “The graphics are very poor, low poly Unity assets.”
- “The graphics are simple, but the meaning of the game is still not in it, all the same it is a strategy.”
gameplay
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The gameplay offers a lot of strategic depth and intuitive design, but can become repetitive due to excessive clicking and lacks unique interfaces or concepts. Overall, it balances complexity with simplicity, though it may not feel particularly innovative.
- “In general, this is a colossal work that considers each element affecting the gameplay outcome. I was pleased with the simple visuals, which are intuitive enough to quickly understand what and why.”
- “Gameplay-wise, the game allows a lot.”
- “But if you actually manage to understand, it quickly becomes repetitive as the gameplay consists in a lot of clicking.”
- “Lacks any kind of unique interface, gameplay or concepts.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The music is generally considered good and reasonably priced, though some find it unremarkable. However, there are no related achievements, which is seen as a downside.
- “Good music and not a high price, it's a pity there are no achievements.”
- “Soundtrack was ok”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, with numerous bugs and a lack of polish that negatively impact the overall experience. Users find it frustrating and confusing due to unclear instructions and persistent technical problems.
- “It is incredibly buggy.”
- “Super buggy and lacks polish, wouldn't buy again.”
- “Game is really buggy and there is no real explanation of what stuff does or what you should do.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization approach is widely criticized for being unethical and exploitative, with developers repeatedly releasing low-quality, copied content as cash grabs that undermine genuine indie creators and reduce their visibility on Steam.
- “Cristian Manolachi/Atomic Fabrik have shown a repeat pattern of unethically dumping other people's work onto Steam as a cheap, nasty cash grab.”
- “They're nothing but cash grabs, and they harm genuine indie developers by reducing their visibility on Steam.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story aspect received minimal attention, indicating it is likely simple or not a major focus of the game. Users did not provide detailed feedback on the narrative.