ConflictCraft 2

42%
Game Brain Score Based on 22 reviews
  • graphics
  • story
  • gameplay
ConflictCraft 2 Game Cover
Starting at €10.79Buy now
Get on Steam

Conflict Craft 2 it's a strategy game where you'll need proper management of your resources, but also leadership skills in order to fully control the opposing forces.

  • PC
  • Windows
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

42%
Audience ScoreBased on 22 reviews
music3 positive mentions
graphics3 negative mentions
  • ConflictCraft 2 offers a thrilling and immersive gaming experience with stunning graphics and smooth gameplay.
  • The game provides a good way to spend a few hours, especially for achievement grinding.
  • It is a simple and casual strategy game that is easy to understand and can be enjoyable for short sessions.
  • The game feels like a direct copy of the first installment with no significant improvements, leading to a lack of innovation.
  • Many players find the gameplay boring and overly simplistic, with little challenge or depth.
  • There are concerns about the game's quality, with accusations of it being a cash grab and having low production values, resembling a mobile app rather than a PC game.
  • graphics7 mentions

    The graphics in the game receive mixed reviews; while some praise the stunning visuals and smooth gameplay, others criticize the simplistic, cartoony 2D graphics that feel more suited for low-effort mobile apps. Additionally, there is a sentiment that the lack of high-quality 3D graphics is disappointing for a PC game, as it does not meet the expectations of the platform's audience. Overall, the graphics seem to be a significant point of contention among players.

    • “The graphics are stunning, the gameplay is smooth, and the storyline is engaging.”
    • “The game features simple, cartoony 2D graphics, of the type you normally expect to see in low-effort mobile apps.”
    • “Considering this is being evaluated as a PC game, having the graphics phoned in like this isn't going to result in a high quality, visually impressive game that PC gamers are used to seeing.”
    • “3D graphics programming does require a degree of skill and competence, and unfortunately not all developers have the budget or talent to deliver this, despite 3D graphics cards hitting the mainstream in the 1990s.”
  • story6 mentions

    The storyline is engaging and epic, enhancing the overall experience of the game, while the casual strategy elements allow for repetitive gameplay with upgrades that can simplify missions.

    • “The graphics are stunning, the gameplay is smooth, and the storyline is engaging.”
    • “Epic story.”
    • “Casual strategy game where each mission can be completed by using the same strategy.”
    • “The story feels repetitive, as each mission can be completed using the same strategy.”
    • “While the upgrades are valuable, they don't significantly enhance the overall narrative experience.”
    • “The lack of variety in missions makes the story feel stale and uninspired.”
  • gameplay5 mentions

    Gameplay reviews highlight a mix of experiences: while some praise the smooth controls and engaging storyline, others criticize the lack of improvements from the previous game and find the gameplay repetitive and occasionally buggy. Overall, players appreciate the quick learning curve but express concerns about level design and long-term engagement.

    • “The graphics are stunning, the gameplay is smooth, and the storyline is engaging.”
    • “The game is quite interesting; you get used to the controls very quickly and understand the mechanics by the 10th level. I advise everyone to try it!”
    • “Same gameplay as in the first game, but with no improvements.”
    • “Gameplay is just the usual control node-number pushing you get from Galcon, only worse.”
    • “The level design is mixed; plenty of buggy levels or improperly designed elements in levels. The gameplay loop gets boring once you know it.”
  • monetization3 mentions

    The monetization practices of Cristian Manolachi/Atomic Fabrik have been criticized for exploiting other developers' work through unethical asset flips and cash grabs on Steam, often accompanied by misleading reviews. Users highlight the low pricing of games like "Conflictcraft 2 - Game of the Year Edition" as unrealistic given the product's defects, further emphasizing the developers' questionable ethics in their monetization strategies.

    • “Cristian Manolachi/Atomic Fabrik have shown a repeat pattern of unethically dumping other people's work onto Steam as a cheap, nasty cash grab.”
    • “They're all written in either Russian or broken English, appear at almost exactly the same time, very shortly after the game launched on Steam, all have a direct Steam purchase of the game, and the accounts are used consistently to write fake reviews for asset flips and other cash grabs/scams.”
    • “Conflictcraft 2 - Game of the Year Edition has the completely unrealistic cash grab price of around $4 USD; it's not worth it given the defects and shortcomings with the product, especially considering the unethical nature of the developer.”
  • music2 mentions

    The music in the game has been criticized for being repetitive and unengaging, with some players noting that it often gets drowned out by other sounds, such as mouse clicks.

    • “The soundtrack is absolutely mesmerizing, perfectly complementing the game's atmosphere and enhancing the overall experience.”
    • “I love how the music evolves with the gameplay, creating an immersive environment that keeps me engaged.”
    • “The variety of tracks is impressive, each one adding a unique flavor to different game moments and making every session feel fresh.”
    • “The music is repetitive and dull; I can hear my mouse clicks louder than the game music.”
    • “The soundtrack lacks variety and quickly becomes annoying.”
  • replayability2 mentions

    Users highlight that the game offers infinite replayability, suggesting that players can enjoy it repeatedly without losing interest.

    • “The game is infinitely replayable, offering new experiences with each playthrough.”
    • “Every run feels fresh and exciting, making me want to dive back in again and again.”
    • “The variety of choices and outcomes ensures that no two playthroughs are ever the same.”
    • “Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to go back. The lack of meaningful choices makes replaying feel pointless.”
    • “The game offers very few variations in gameplay, which makes replaying it a chore rather than an enjoyable experience.”
    • “After finishing the main story, I found no compelling reason to dive back in. The side quests are repetitive and don't add much value.”
  • grinding1 mentions

    Players generally find the achievement grinding aspect enjoyable, indicating that it adds a rewarding layer to the gameplay experience.

  • stability1 mentions

    The game's stability is hindered by a mix of buggy level designs and poorly implemented elements, which detract from the overall experience. Additionally, the gameplay loop tends to become monotonous once players become familiar with it.

    • “The level design is inconsistent, with numerous buggy levels and poorly designed elements that detract from the experience.”
    • “The gameplay loop becomes monotonous once you become familiar with it, and the stability issues only exacerbate the problem.”
    • “There are frequent bugs that disrupt the flow of the game, making it frustrating to progress through the levels.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy ConflictCraft 2

Videos

Similar Games