ConflictCraft 2

About

ConflictCraft 2 is a single player and multiplayer casual strategy game. It was developed by Cristian Manolachi and was released on February 10, 2022. It received neutral reviews from players.

"ConflictCraft 2" is a strategy game where you control enemy bases to destroy them while managing resources and leading opposing forces. You'll need to balance defense and offense, using a variety of military vehicles and weapons. Upgrades are available after each level to enhance your destructive capabilities.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

59%

Audience ScoreBased on 44 reviews

story4 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

ConflictCraft 2 offers a thrilling and immersive gaming experience with stunning graphics and smooth gameplay.
The game is enjoyable for casual play, making it a good way to unwind and spend a few hours.
Players appreciate the strategic elements and challenges, making it a recommended title for gaming enthusiasts.

Many players find the game boring and repetitive, with little improvement over the first installment.
The game is criticized for its high difficulty level and lack of engaging gameplay, leading to frustration.
There are concerns about the game's quality, with accusations of it being a cash grab and lacking originality.

graphics
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
65%
21%
The graphics in the game receive mixed reviews; while some players praise them as stunning and engaging, others criticize the simplistic, cartoony 2D style reminiscent of low-effort mobile apps. There is a consensus that the lack of high-quality 3D graphics is disappointing for a PC game, as it does not meet the expectations of gamers accustomed to visually impressive titles.
- “The graphics are stunning, the gameplay is smooth, and the storyline is engaging.”
- “The game features simple, cartoony 2D graphics, of the type you normally expect to see in low-effort mobile apps.”
- “Considering this is being evaluated as a PC game, having the graphics phoned in like this isn't going to result in a high quality, visually impressive game that PC gamers are used to seeing.”
- “3D graphics programming does require a degree of skill and competence, and unfortunately not all developers have the budget or talent to deliver this, despite 3D graphics cards hitting the mainstream in the 1990s.”
story
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
42%
25%
The story is described as engaging and epic, enhancing the overall experience of the game. Players appreciate how the narrative complements the smooth gameplay and stunning graphics, making each mission feel meaningful within the context of the storyline.
- “The graphics are stunning, the gameplay is smooth, and the storyline is engaging.”
- “Epic story.”
- “Casual strategy game where each mission can be completed by using the same strategy.”
- “The story is lacking depth and feels repetitive, as each mission can be completed using the same strategy.”
- “There is little to no narrative progression, making the gameplay feel monotonous.”
- “The missions lack variety, which detracts from any potential story development.”
gameplay
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
40%
30%
Gameplay reviews are mixed, with some praising the smooth controls and engaging mechanics that become intuitive by the 10th level. However, others criticize the lack of improvements from the first game, repetitive gameplay, and issues with level design, including bugs and poorly designed elements that can lead to a boring experience. Overall, while the game has its strengths, it also suffers from significant drawbacks.
- “The graphics are stunning, the gameplay is smooth, and the storyline is engaging.”
- “The game is quite interesting; you get used to the controls very quickly and understand the mechanics by the 10th level. I advise everyone to try it!”
- “The gameplay is engaging and offers a smooth experience that keeps you hooked.”
- “Same gameplay as in the first game, but with no improvements.”
- “Gameplay is just the usual control node-number pushing you get from Galcon, only worse.”
- “The level design is mixed, with plenty of buggy levels or improperly designed elements in levels; the gameplay loop gets boring once you know it.”
monetization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of Cristian Manolachi/Atomic Fabrik has been criticized for being exploitative, with accusations of releasing low-quality asset flips on Steam as quick cash grabs. Users highlight the presence of fake reviews and the unethical practices surrounding the pricing, particularly noting that titles like "Conflictcraft 2 - Game of the Year Edition" are overpriced given their defects and the developer's questionable reputation.
- “Cristian Manolachi/Atomic Fabrik have shown a repeat pattern of unethically dumping other people's work onto Steam as a cheap, nasty cash grab.”
- “Conflictcraft 2 - Game of the Year Edition has the completely unrealistic cash grab price of around $4 USD; it's not worth it given the defects and shortcomings with the product, especially considering the unethical nature of the developer.”
- “They're all written in either Russian or broken English, appear at almost exactly the same time, very shortly after the game launched on Steam, all have a direct Steam purchase of the game, and the accounts are used consistently to write fake reviews for asset flips and other cash grabs/scams.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The music in the game has been criticized for being repetitive and unengaging, with players noting that it often fades into the background, overshadowed by the sounds of their mouse clicks. Overall, the soundtrack fails to enhance the gaming experience.
- “Bad, the same repetitive music, and I can hear my mouse clicks louder than the game music.”
- “Bad, the same repetitive music, and I can hear my mouse clicks louder than the game music.”
replayability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
25%
Users consistently highlight the game's "infinitely replayable" nature, indicating that it offers a compelling experience that encourages multiple playthroughs. This aspect significantly enhances its long-term appeal and engagement.
- “Infinitely replayable.”
- “Infinitely replayable.”
- “The game offers endless opportunities for replayability.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players generally find the achievement grinding aspect enjoyable, indicating that it adds a rewarding layer to the gameplay experience.
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is hindered by a mix of buggy levels and poorly designed elements, leading to a frustrating experience. Additionally, the gameplay loop tends to become monotonous once players become familiar with it.
- “The level design is mixed, with plenty of buggy levels and improperly designed elements. The gameplay loop becomes boring once you know it.”