Chess Opening Repertoire Builder

About

Chess Opening Repertoire Builder is a single player sport game. It was developed by BRANE and was released on February 26, 2024. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

JOIN THE COMMUNITY About the GameChess Opening Repertoire Builder or CORB is a chess app/game extracted from chess career simulation game Master of Chess. You can play against AI in opening of your choice It is designed as a helping tool for expanding, better understanding and training of your chess opening repertoire.Features Expand your opening repertoire via graph display of opening line…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Chess Opening Repertoire Builder screenshot

Skip User Reviews

77%

Audience ScoreBased on 22 reviews

optimization3 negative mentions

The app is an effective training tool for building and solidifying a chess opening repertoire, providing clear explanations and customizable training options.
The user interface is clean and straightforward, making it accessible for players of all skill levels, and it offers useful features like notes on moves and color coding.
The built-in AI opponent allows users to practice their knowledge and identify areas for improvement, making it a valuable resource for serious chess players.

The app can be buggy when opening and closing, and lacks essential features like undo/redo options, making it tedious for users.
The focus on specific opening lines may feel repetitive for casual players, and the current content library could benefit from a wider variety of openings.
The optimization is poor, leading to high resource usage, and the design of the mindmap can be confusing, detracting from the overall user experience.

optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
Overall, the optimization of the game is mixed; while the interface is praised for its simplicity and stable performance across various PCs, users report persistent bugs and subpar optimization, particularly regarding the chess engine used.
- “Has some bugs still, optimization could be better, and it uses a chess engine that is lacking a bit (Stockfish is open-source, so not sure why it doesn't use that, but I'm sure there's some reason).”
- “Very poor optimization.”
- “The interface is simple and intuitive, the performance is stable and smooth for all kinds of PCs and workstations.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The game's stability is marked by frequent bugs during startup and shutdown, leading some users to suggest embracing these glitches as part of the overall gaming experience.
- “1) The game is buggy when opening and closing.”
- “The game is plagued by glitches that disrupt the experience.”
- “Frequent crashes make it difficult to enjoy the game.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game tedious and frustrating, often leading to a negative experience due to its repetitive nature.
- “This limitation makes it tedious and frustrating.”
- “The grinding feels endless and lacks any real reward.”
- “I find myself doing the same tasks over and over, which quickly becomes boring.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
300%
Reviews indicate a strong resistance to microtransactions and loot boxes, with players expressing a desire to combat pay-to-win mechanics. Many view these monetization strategies as detrimental to the gaming experience, likening their opposition to a noble crusade against unfair practices.
- “Together, we shall weather the storm of microtransactions and loot boxes, standing tall against the tide of pay-to-win villains like noble knights in a digital crusade.”
- “The game is riddled with microtransactions that make it feel more like a cash grab than a genuine experience.”
- “Loot boxes are everywhere, and it feels like the developers are more interested in profit than player satisfaction.”
- “The pay-to-win mechanics ruin the balance of the game, making it frustrating for those who don't want to spend extra money.”