Avenger Sharks

About

Avenger Sharks is a single player action game. It was developed by Mewcenary and was released on February 21, 2024. It received very positive reviews from players.

Avenger Sharks is a retro twin-stick shooter. Featuring sharks. OUT FOR VENGEANCE! Your fishy friends have been kidnapped (fish-napped?) by evil forces. Battle wave after wave of enemies as you fight to rescue them. Increase your chances by collecting power-ups, health potions and UPGRADES as you progress. Invoke FISH FRENZY as needed to even the odds, as well as any trusty friends you find …

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

94%

Audience ScoreBased on 18 reviews

music2 negative mentions

The game is free to play, providing a low-risk opportunity for gamers to enjoy it.
It offers fast-paced action with easy controls, making it accessible for quick gaming sessions.
The emphasis on high scores adds to the replay value, encouraging players to improve their performance.

The graphics are considered poor and lack originality, making it visually unappealing.
The gameplay quickly becomes repetitive due to the reliance on procedural generation for levels.
There are issues with enemy spawn rates and difficulty, making it challenging to evade hazards.

graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The graphics in the game have received mixed reviews, with some users criticizing the low-quality pixel art as "godawful" and suggesting a lack of skill or resources from the developer. In contrast, others appreciate the modern graphics and smooth controls, indicating a more favorable view of the visual presentation in certain aspects.
- “The game features fast-paced action with modern-day graphics and easy controls, seamlessly moving from location to location.”
- “The visuals are stunning, showcasing a vibrant and immersive world that enhances the overall gameplay experience.”
- “The attention to detail in the graphics is impressive, making every environment feel alive and engaging.”
- “This feature is really godawful, lazy pixel crap 'art' instead of real graphics.”
- “It's hard to say if this was because the developer didn't have the skill to create 3D visuals, or couldn't afford to hire someone who does, but it also doesn't matter.”
- “Games like Terraria and Stardew Valley succeeded despite the bad graphics, not because of them.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music, though repetitive, effectively encourages movement and adds to the overall enjoyment of the short experience, making it a positive aspect for players.
- “While the music is the same track on repeat, it made me want to groove and move, so that's always a plus!”
- “It's a short experience, so repetitive music isn't really a problem for me.”
gameplay
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The gameplay has been criticized for lacking meaningful bespoke levels and narrative-driven progression, suggesting that the developer did not fully engage in creating a rich gaming experience.
- “The developer chose not to do the job of a real game developer and create meaningful bespoke levels, narrative-based gameplay progression, and so on.”
- “The gameplay feels repetitive and lacks any real depth or innovation.”
- “Controls are clunky and unresponsive, making it frustrating to navigate through the game.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Users generally perceive stability in the game as inconsistent, with some embracing the glitches as charming quirks rather than significant issues. Overall, while the game may experience technical hiccups, these are often viewed as part of its unique character.
- “The game crashes frequently, making it nearly unplayable at times.”
- “I experienced constant lag and frame drops, which ruined the overall experience.”
- “There are numerous bugs that disrupt gameplay, leading to frustrating moments.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
300%
Reviews highlight a strong resistance to microtransactions and loot boxes, with players expressing a desire to combat the prevalence of pay-to-win mechanics in games. Many view these monetization strategies as detrimental to the gaming experience, advocating for a more fair and balanced approach.
- “Together, we shall weather the storm of microtransactions and loot boxes, standing tall against the tide of pay-to-win villains like noble knights in a digital crusade.”
- “The game is riddled with microtransactions that feel exploitative and detract from the overall experience.”
- “Loot boxes are everywhere, and it feels like the game is designed to push players towards spending more money.”
- “The pay-to-win mechanics ruin the balance, making it frustrating for those who don't want to spend extra cash.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
Players appreciate the game's replayability due to its scoring system, which encourages them to continually improve their performance and strive for higher personal bests. This focus on self-competition enhances the overall experience and motivates repeated play.
- “The emphasis on scoring adds to the replay value of the game, allowing you to challenge yourself to achieve higher scores and set new personal bests.”
- “Each playthrough feels fresh due to the variety of choices and outcomes, making you want to dive back in and explore different paths.”
- “The dynamic gameplay mechanics ensure that no two sessions are the same, encouraging repeated plays to discover new strategies and experiences.”
- “The emphasis on a score adds to the replay value of the game, as you can push yourself to get the score higher and higher to beat your personal best and set a new one.”
- “Once you complete the game, there’s little incentive to play again since the story doesn’t change and the challenges feel repetitive.”
- “The lack of varied outcomes or different paths makes replaying the game feel more like a chore than an enjoyable experience.”