Cats

About

Cats is a single player casual simulation game. It was developed by 100 Cozy Games and was released on May 21, 2024. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Feature List About the GameWhat is this game about?Cats — and that says it all. Interactive cat clicker. Click on cats for new cats. That's all, really.Features: Clicking by Cats Meow Sound Music HQ Cats Low System Requirements Black & White artworks Colored Cats Take care of the Cats, give them a good click. It feels good! We guess so...

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

72%

Audience ScoreBased on 975 reviews

gameplay8 positive mentions

story6 negative mentions

Charming and cute cat visual design with appealing animations.
Easy and fast achievements, suitable for casual gamers and achievement hunters.
Relaxing and enjoyable for cat lovers looking for simple, mindless gameplay.

Gameplay is extremely repetitive and lacks meaningful progression or challenges.
Many users report the game being a marketplace-focused cash grab with limited item utility and frequent scam-like mechanics.
Technical issues including confusing UI, annoying sound effects, lack of updates, and restrictions on trading or deleting items.

gameplay
38 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
66%
13%
The gameplay is casual, charming, and easy to pick up, making it well-suited for short, relaxing sessions, especially for cat lovers. However, it lacks depth, meaningful progression, and complexity, leading to repetitive and shallow experiences that may bore players seeking long-term engagement or challenge.
- “Dynamic gameplay made every moment feel authentic and memorable.”
- “The art style is charming, the gameplay is easy to pick up, and it’s perfect for short casual sessions.”
- “Simple mechanics make for addictive gameplay, and adorable characters keep me smiling.”
- “It gives a quick dopamine hit if you just want to tick achievements, but there’s almost no meaningful gameplay or progression and the loop gets boring fast.”
- “There’s no deep strategy, no real progression system, and no complex mechanics—just a screen full of cats and your finger (or mouse) doing all the work.”
- “Without any meaningful upgrades, progression systems, or surprises, the gameplay can start to feel flat after a short while.”
graphics
21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
53%
14%
The game's graphics are charming and visually appealing, featuring cute, meticulously designed cats with expressive animations that bring them to life. While the visuals are simple and minimal, they effectively capture the playful nature of the cats, making the art style both calming and enjoyable for casual play.
- “The game's graphics are stunning, with each cat meticulously designed, from their fluffy tails to their expressive eyes.”
- “The visuals are simple yet appealing, with cute animations that bring the cats to life.”
- “Stunning visuals and animations bring these furry friends to life.”
- “Cute cats, not many visuals or animations though, very cute and can run on a potato.”
- “Graphics: □ □ ■ □ □”
- “[*]art style: □ □ □ □ ■”
story
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
15%
55%
30%
The story aspect is largely criticized for being either nonexistent or unengaging, with many users describing it as lacking depth, excitement, or meaningful progression. Some users mention occasional simple narratives, but overall the game is noted for having no compelling or substantial story.
- “Story surprised me.”
- “The second was the story of a cat who found himself in a pet cemetery at night and managed to defeat the cat ghouls and dog ghouls before dawn.”
- “But the story of a kitten, who was sent to kindergarten and where little children played with him, won by a large margin.”
- “No gameplay, no story, no progress, no challenge, there is nothing of substance.”
- “Has a story, but it’s boring.”
- “There are no exciting tasks, challenges, or storylines to keep players engaged.”
music
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
50%
21%
The music in Cats receives mixed feedback, with some players praising its relaxing, enjoyable, and even "mindblowing" soundtrack, while others criticize the repetitive, loud, and intrusive looping music that lacks an option to be turned off. Overall, the music adds some charm but can become annoying during extended play.
- “This is such a masterpiece with music that is mindblowing and the epic fight scenes are so cool.”
- “Soundtrack 10/10.”
- “I relaxed for 5 minutes to this music long enough to realize that I was going to be okay.”
- “Useless loud music, game takes way too long to start for such a clown game.”
- “Also no settings to turn off the horrible music that blasts through your boxes.”
- “Nice clicker game with a lot of effort put into it, but the looping non-stop music and the loud sound effects gave me a very painful headache.”
grinding
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
88%
The grinding aspect is heavily criticized as monotonous and primarily focused on repetitive item or NFT farming with little entertainment value. Players describe it as excessively grindy, likening it to clicker or achievement farming games that require significant time, macros, or patience to progress.
- “I'm not going to play a game for whoever knows how many hours when even other reviews just seem to show it's another clicker, Steam inventory farming game.”
- “You'll need a second life, maybe some macros, and a will to live for grinding.”
- “"Cats" is a game focused entirely on item farming with no real entertainment value.”
monetization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
83%
The game's monetization is widely criticized as a cash grab, with in-game item sales yielding minimal profit after fees and upgrades feeling overpriced and unsupported. While some find the monetization straightforward and unobtrusive, overall it is seen as low effort and intrusive, detracting from the gameplay experience.
- “There is easy and unobtrusive monetization, internal clicker tournaments!”
- “You won’t make any profit playing this; most drops only sell for pennies after fees, and every sale funnels a cut to Steam and the developer, so it feels more like a cash grab than a game.”
- “It does as advertised; however, it is boring and a cash grab when it comes to any upgrades.”
- “This is a cheap, unsupported cash grab.”
humor
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor is playful and lighthearted, with users finding the concept of clicking on cats amusing and addictive. While some found it genuinely funny and enjoyable, a few felt it lacked depth and did not fully deliver on its comedic potential.
- “Who knew clicking on cats could be so hilariously addictive?”
- “Funny, easy.”
- “Full funny !!!!!”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
25%
The game's optimization is highly praised, running smoothly on a wide range of systems without noticeable bugs. Performance is stable and reliable, contributing to an overall seamless experience.
- “For performance, it should run on anything, didn't come across bugs.”
- “Visuals and performance are well-optimized.”
- “Performance rating: 4 out of 5.”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game delivers a genuinely heartwarming and wholesome emotional experience, creating moments that evoke laughter, tears, and cherished connections. Its cozy atmosphere brings players closer, fostering heartfelt conversations and a strong sense of togetherness.
- “From heartwarming speeches to tear-jerking hugs, every moment felt genuine and cherished.”
- “Whether you're playing with, collecting, or simply watching adorable cats do their thing, this game provides a cozy and wholesome experience.”
- “It's more than just a game; it's a thread that's woven us closer together, sparking laughter and heartfelt conversations.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game experiences occasional technical glitches and bugs, causing some frustration among users. Overall, stability is somewhat lacking and could benefit from improvements.
- “I've encountered some technical glitches occasionally, which can be frustrating.”
- “Bugs and glitches are frequent and disrupt gameplay.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users rate the game's replayability low, indicating limited incentive or enjoyment in playing the game multiple times.