Capitalism Plus

About

Capitalism Plus is a business simulation game that puts you in charge of your own company. Create and manage various aspects of your business, such as production, marketing, and research. Expand your company and compete with other AI-controlled firms to become a dominant force in the industry. With a variety of customizable settings and difficulty levels, Capitalism Plus offers a challenging and engaging experience for players interested in exploring the complex world of business.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

84%

Audience ScoreBased on 62 reviews

graphics5 positive mentions

grinding4 negative mentions

The game offers a deep and complex economic simulation that remains accessible and engaging, making it a great tool for understanding business strategies.
Despite its age, the game still provides a satisfying gameplay experience with a variety of strategies and product types to explore.
It has educational value, often being used in business schools to illustrate fundamental concepts of economics and management.

The graphics and interface are extremely dated, which can detract from the overall experience for modern players.
The game suffers from bugs and technical issues, particularly in the Steam version, which can lead to frustrating gameplay.
There is a steep learning curve, and the extensive micromanagement required can become tedious and overwhelming for some players.

graphics
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
43%
21%
The graphics of the game are generally considered dated and basic, reflecting its origins as a DOS title. While some players find them aesthetically pleasing or adequate for gameplay, others note that the visuals may deter those seeking modern graphics. Overall, the game's engaging mechanics often overshadow its antiquated visuals, making it enjoyable for those willing to overlook this aspect.
- “This is aesthetically pleasing for me.”
- “The graphics are great for it being a DOS game and the gameplay is fun enough.”
- “Capitalism is one of my favorite games of all time, vastly better than the standard tycoon game, its dated graphics notwithstanding.”
- “The graphics are pretty basic.”
- “Great economic strategy game if you can get over the ancient visuals.”
- “If you can stand the terrible graphics and dated game mechanics, go for it!”
grinding
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players note that the grinding aspect of the game has shifted from a diverse empire-building experience to a more focused approach, where players are limited to a single area of specialization. While the original allowed for a broader range of activities, the current version emphasizes raw material production and manufacturing, requiring players to invest time in specific industries like farming or retail, which may feel restrictive to some.
- “In the original, you could build an empire consisting of many different areas - farming, mining, manufacturing, and then sell the produced goods. In this version, you have to choose just one area, and everything is then locked into that one specific area.”
- “Whereas Railroad Tycoon and a train covered the railroad industry in excellent detail from a business aspect, this game covers instead raw material production (farming, chemicals, forestry, oil, gold mining, etc. are all included), manufacturing (do you want to make a car? nappy? coke? shampoo? jewellery? or, showing its game age – a VCR? – it’s all in the game, and much more), importing and retailing.”
- “Stock market (dividend, P/E ratio, public offerings, etc.), manufacturing, retail business, farming, mining, R&D, and other things.”
gameplay
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
Gameplay is heavily impacted by bugs, particularly with "random events" and "city appearance," which can cause crashes; disabling these features may lead to smoother performance but at the cost of some game depth. While the graphics and mechanics are dated, players who can overlook these aspects may find the gameplay immersive and reflective of true business mechanics, though compatibility with modern systems may vary.
- “I tried getting my local economics teacher to play this to see just how detailed and awesome it was showing true business mechanics.”
- “There might be some negatives for some players – the game is a DOS box game, so hopefully it will work on your machine. The graphics are extremely dated (but you’ll be fully immersed in the gameplay to notice), and as the game is a few decades old you’ll need to put up with a few ancient products and images and understand that Gates and Buffett only had around a quarter of today’s wealth back in the day.”
- “If you can stand the terrible graphics and dated game mechanics, go for it!”
- “The gameplay feels clunky and unresponsive, making it frustrating to enjoy.”
- “I found the controls to be unintuitive, which really detracted from the overall experience.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The absence of music in the game has led to significant disappointment among users, as the original soundtrack was well-received and its omission detracts from the overall experience. Many feel misled by promotional materials that included music, especially given the low price point of the game.
- “The original game music was cool and somehow has been left out of the game, probably because it was a big effort to port the CD tracks into this DOSBox version.”
- “The main reason for the thumbs down is that there is no music.”
- “I bought the game in a sale for only €2.99, but even so, I feel disappointed, as I was expecting to buy the full game and the video of the game includes the music.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users report that while starting a sheep farm is straightforward, the process of producing wool is plagued by bugs, leading to occasional frustration. However, many feel that the issues are manageable given the game's price point.
- “Starting a sheep farm is easy, but getting the farm to produce wool to make socks and sweaters is buggy.”
- “Can be somewhat frustrating when it glitches, but not all that bad for what you pay.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The monetization strategy involves selling items through department stores while employing branding techniques and advertising to increase market share. There is also a mention of an advertising team, suggesting a structured approach to marketing efforts.
- “The monetization strategy feels overly aggressive, with constant prompts to spend money on in-game items.”
- “It seems like the game prioritizes profit over player experience, making it hard to enjoy without spending.”
- “The reliance on microtransactions is frustrating, as it feels like essential content is locked behind a paywall.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
300%
The game features a distinct vaporwave atmosphere, creating a unique and immersive experience that enhances its business simulation elements.
- “This is a business sim that has a vaporwave atmosphere.”
- “The atmosphere feels more like a hollow shell than an immersive experience.”
- “Despite the game's setting, the atmosphere lacks any real depth or engagement.”
- “The overall vibe is flat and uninspired, failing to draw players into the world.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The humor in the game is noted to be present in the product selection, but overall, it feels outdated and lacks freshness.
- “The humor in this game is spot-on, with clever jokes that kept me laughing throughout my playthrough.”
- “I love how the game incorporates witty dialogue and funny scenarios that make even the most mundane tasks entertaining.”
- “The comedic timing in the game is fantastic, and the quirky characters add a delightful charm that enhances the overall experience.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
Reviewers note that while the game offers limited replayability once a successful strategy is mastered, its low price point of $6.00, especially during sales, makes it a worthwhile purchase.
- “The game offers a variety of strategies and paths to explore, making each playthrough feel fresh and engaging.”
- “With multiple endings and character choices, I find myself coming back to experience different outcomes every time.”
- “The random events and challenges keep the gameplay dynamic, ensuring that no two sessions are ever the same.”
- “Once you learn a successful strategy, the replay value is not that strong.”
- “The game lacks depth, making it feel repetitive after a few playthroughs.”
- “There isn't much incentive to replay the game once you've completed it.”