Call of Nightmare

About

Call of Nightmare is a single player casual action adventure game. It was developed by NightmaresGames and was released on October 13, 2017. It received undefined reviews from critics.

Deadly horrors fill the world. To survive in this demonic world, you have to kill everything that moves. You will visit different parts of the world, from ancient destroyed cities to forest fringes.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

optimization3 positive mentions

music3 negative mentions

The game runs stably without performance issues.
It is relatively cheap, making it accessible for those curious about it.
The game has a simple structure that may appeal to players looking for a quick experience.

The game is an asset flip with poor quality assets and no original content.
Gameplay is clunky, repetitive, and lacks basic features like health pickups and music.
The overall presentation is horrendous, making it one of the worst rail shooters available.

music
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The music quality in games is generally expected to be high, but "Call of Nightmare" notably lacks any music or ambient sound, which has drawn criticism from users.
- “Bizarrely, 'Call of Nightmare' doesn't even have any music at all.”
- “- No background or ambient music.”
- “The audio and music must be of high quality.”
gameplay
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The gameplay is criticized for being janky and unsatisfying, with poor handling and responsiveness that detracts from the overall experience. Reviewers note a lack of polish and apparent gameplay testing, leading to frustrating mechanics that fail to meet the expectations of experienced gamers.
- “It's janky and unsatisfying to play... and any experienced gamer will tell you, the handling, responsiveness and general gameplay feel of the control scheme must be well polished for this kind of game to succeed.”
- “Unfortunately, this is something the developer seems to have phoned in, with little to no apparent gameplay testing.”
- “All with poor mechanics.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The monetization strategy of the game has been criticized for being a cash grab, with accusations of plagiarism due to the lack of credit given to the original artists and developers of the assets used. This has led to a negative perception of the game's ethical practices in its financial model.
- “The developers didn't credit any of the artists and real game developers who created the assets, so this is plagiarism, as well as a cash grab.”
- “The monetization strategy feels exploitative, prioritizing profit over player experience.”
- “It's frustrating to see so many paywalls in a game that could have been enjoyable without the constant push to spend more money.”
graphics
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The graphics in the game are limited, as players note the absence of resolution options and meaningful graphics adjustments, which restricts customization and overall visual experience.
- “There's no option to change the resolution and no useful graphics tweaks.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The game is reported to have no performance issues, indicating strong optimization and a smooth gameplay experience.
- “There are no performance issues at all.”
- “The game runs smoothly without any performance issues.”
- “I haven't encountered any performance issues during my gameplay.”