Blood Bowl: Death Zone Game Cover

"Blood Bowl: Death Zone" is a digital tabletop game inspired by the Warhammer fantasy universe. Assemble a team of elite players and engage in turn-based tactical combat in fast-paced, deadly matches. Customize your team's skills, appearance, and playstyle to dominate the tournament scene and claim the championship title.

  • PC
  • Windows

Reviews

17%
Audience ScoreBased on 69 reviews
humor3 positive mentions
gameplay4 negative mentions
  • The game has fun winter vibes and a unique concept that could appeal to some players.
  • It includes various teams, which adds some variety to the gameplay.
  • The game could potentially be enjoyable for multiplayer sessions with friends, providing a light-hearted experience.
  • The game is plagued by numerous bugs, crashes, and unresponsive controls, making it virtually unplayable.
  • It lacks essential features and customization options that are hallmarks of the Blood Bowl franchise, leading to a hollow experience.
  • The gameplay is described as clunky and chaotic, with a steep learning curve that detracts from the enjoyment.
  • gameplay16 mentions

    The gameplay has been widely criticized for its numerous flaws, including frequent freezing, poor mechanics, and a lack of engaging content, leading to a frustrating experience for players. Many reviewers describe it as janky and repetitive, with a failure to capture the fun elements of the original game. Overall, the consensus is that the gameplay is fundamentally broken and unenjoyable, overshadowed by technical issues and a lack of depth.

    • “It tries to capture some of the chaotic spasms of joy that have always made Blood Bowl fun; but falls tragically short when it comes to actual gameplay.”
    • “Managed to play the tutorial and the gameplay is there; it's just really janky and some of the hotkeys don't even work.”
    • “Not only is the gameplay highly questionable, but it keeps on freezing for no reason, resulting in automatic forfeits and forcing you to restart your entire campaign.”
    • “The gameplay, as I generously call it, is in fact just hitting a few buttons in fast sequence and using the same powers and strengths across every team.”
    • “Crashes during every game, terrible gameplay, real-time action, but the GUI is too buggy to let the players know what they're supposed to do.”
  • graphics6 mentions

    Reviews indicate that while the graphics are considered "okay" and an improvement over previous versions, there is a sentiment that simply enhancing visuals is not enough if the core gameplay remains flawed. Players express a desire for a faithful recreation of the original game's aesthetic using the updated graphics engine, emphasizing that solid graphics should complement a strong gameplay foundation.

    • “It's like a much better version of Kerrunch, with better graphics and more control of players.”
    • “You can bring all the 4k effects if the core is rotten nothing will change with fancy graphics.”
    • “All they have to do is make a carbon copy of the original game's mode with this updated graphics engine and I'd be happy!”
    • “From gameplay to lore, graphics, bugs, even to player base.”
  • story3 mentions

    The game's story is generally considered lacking, with some users describing it as "ok" but ultimately feeling that it fails to capture the classic elements that define the Blood Bowl experience. Additionally, the absence of customization and player choice further detracts from the narrative depth.

    • “It's not like matching against a human would change the lamentable aspects of this game that, to top it off, has no customization of teams, no choice in player composition, no story, and none of the classic elements of Blood Bowl that make Blood Bowl, well... Blood Bowl.”
    • “Story - okay, story I guess.”
    • “Story - okay, story I guess.”
  • music3 mentions

    The music aspect of the game has received mixed reviews; while some users find the soundtrack acceptable, others criticize the lack of music and background audio, noting that the absence of sound creates an odd experience.

    • “There's no audio save for a few crowd noises, but otherwise there's no other background noises and no music, which makes the experience even more odd.”
    • “No music or anything.”
  • humor3 mentions

    The humor in the game is derived from its shortcomings, such as the simplistic AI and the confusing French menu, which players found amusing despite the game's overall poor quality. The experience was further enhanced by playing with friends, leading to laughter about the game's flaws rather than its intended comedic elements.

    • “On this topic, there are only two levels of AI, 'easy' and 'medium'... at least they don't pretend that they have a hard AI, which I thought was very funny but is also incredibly sad.”
    • “But before playing, I opened the options menu and it was in French, which was very confusing and surprisingly funny.”
    • “This really showed how poor the game is; the only reason why it was fun was because we also had two friends on Discord and were laughing about how bad this game was.”
  • monetization1 mentions

    The monetization strategy is perceived as a cash grab, with users feeling that the game was incomplete and hastily released for free alongside another title.

    • “It feels like it was never finished and was made to be a cash grab but failed, so they just threw it in for free with their last game.”
  • stability1 mentions

    The game suffers from significant stability issues, with frequent crashes during gameplay and a buggy GUI that hampers player understanding of objectives, leading to a frustrating experience.

    • “Crashes during every game; terrible gameplay. Real-time action is hindered by a GUI that is too buggy to inform players of their objectives.”
    • “The game is plagued by constant crashes, making it nearly unplayable.”
    • “Frequent stability issues lead to frustrating interruptions, ruining the overall experience.”
  • replayability1 mentions

    Users emphasize that a key characteristic of a good game is its replayability, suggesting that the ability to enjoy the game multiple times enhances its overall value and appeal.

    • “A good game is replayable.”
    • “The variety of choices and outcomes keeps me coming back for more.”
    • “Each playthrough feels fresh and offers new experiences.”
  • atmosphere1 mentions

    Reviewers note that while Blood Bowl, Blood Bowl 2, and Death Zone have their merits, they fail to capture the unique and immersive atmosphere that Chaos League provided.

    • “The atmosphere in this game is incredibly immersive, drawing you into its dark and mysterious world.”
    • “Every detail contributes to a rich atmosphere that keeps you engaged and on the edge of your seat.”
    • “The haunting soundtrack and stunning visuals create an unforgettable atmosphere that enhances the overall experience.”
    • “It is rather funny how Blood Bowl, Blood Bowl 2, and now Death Zone could not replicate the immense atmosphere of Chaos League.”
    • “The atmosphere feels flat and uninspired, lacking the depth that would draw players into the game world.”
    • “Despite the potential, the game fails to create a compelling atmosphere, leaving players feeling disconnected.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Blood Bowl: Death Zone

Videos

Similar Games