Bellfortis

About

Bellfortis is a single player strategy game. It was developed by Rake in Grass and was released on June 19, 2025. It received very positive reviews from players.

Choose one side, stabilize your country, subjugate the surrounding rulers and build a strong and successful empire in this history inspired strategy game from the wild times of the early Middle Ages, when the first European kingdoms were trying to strengthen their power and resist the raids of savage tribes from the east and north. How you achieve this is up to you - destroy your enemies by for…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

93%

Audience ScoreBased on 60 reviews

gameplay13 positive mentions

replayability1 negative mentions

Accessible and engaging grand strategy gameplay combining turn-based map management with real-time tactical battles, appealing to both newcomers and veterans of the genre.
Well-designed core mechanics including diplomacy, kingdom management, and battles that offer a satisfying level of depth without overwhelming complexity.
Active and responsive developer with frequent updates, patches, community engagement, and plans for future content expansions and mod support.

Limited current content with only a few campaigns and maps, leading to reduced replayability and some repetitive gameplay experiences.
Some balance issues in battles, especially with cavalry overpowering archers, and mechanics like marriage/inheritance that can negatively impact economy and gameplay stability.
User interface has usability problems including poor organization, lack of hotkeys/shortcuts, and cluttered or unhelpful information that can hinder player experience.

gameplay
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
38%
12%
The gameplay is enjoyable, accessible, and features well-designed mechanics that balance depth with simplicity, making it appealing for casual and moderately experienced strategy players. While some systems like diplomacy and marriage/inheritance need more depth and balance, core mechanics and tactical combat provide engaging, varied strategic experiences reminiscent of classic strategy games. However, certain mechanics can be exploited or cause setbacks, and overall gameplay variety could improve.
- “The game mechanics are very well done and everything felt like it worked how I'd want it to.”
- “With solid mechanics and engaging gameplay, it immediately brought back memories of the golden era of strategy games like Defender of the Crown and others from the '90s/'00s.”
- “Players can expand their kingdoms through both military conquest and diplomatic maneuvers, providing a rich and varied gameplay experience.”
- “Some mechanics are overpowered and can be easily abused.”
- “Feels like early alpha gameplay.”
- “Diplomacy system: the diplomacy mechanics need more depth.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The graphics are praised for being charming, immersive, and well-suited to the game's indie style, with a unique 2D aesthetic reminiscent of tabletop and RimWorld visuals. While not realistic, the art effectively complements the gameplay and atmosphere, especially for fans of Total War-like games.
- “Absolutely gorgeous gameplay and graphics, great dev team and community!”
- “The artwork is lovely and immersive; the music captivating.”
- “Graphics are great for tabletop lovers with plenty of gruesome blood-soaking warfare and bloodcurdling audio.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
Users appreciate the captivating and immersive music, praising its relaxing and timeless quality, though some wish there were more soundtrack variety beyond the single main track, likely due to budget constraints of a small indie developer.
- “The artwork is lovely and immersive; the music captivating - though I'd love a few more tracks (understandable, however, that the music budget is limited for a small indie developer).”
- “During more calm moments of running my kingdom, I was surrounded by the relaxing music of another era, timeless and echoing across the winds of time.”
- “My only gripe is that there is just a single soundtrack piece from the main menu to the strategic map.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Replayability is considered limited compared to similar strategy games like EU4 and CK3, as most countries tend to play in a similar manner. Some users have yet to fully assess this aspect.
- “Not as replayable as, let's say, EU4 or CK3, as most of the countries play similarly.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story aspect is appreciated for its integration of quests and special events that offer meaningful choices, though users desire deeper narrative elements tied to historical generals and more intricate territory management to enhance engagement.
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Grinding is criticized for being tedious and poorly organized, with unhelpful information, confusing army management, and ineffective icons, though it remains playable despite these flaws.
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is generally stable with only minor glitches reported, causing minimal disruption to gameplay.
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's optimization is generally average, with performance that meets basic expectations but lacks standout smoothness or efficiency.