Battlefield Bad Company 2

Battlefield: Bad Company 2 hasn't revolutionized the shooter genre, but it takes everything good about FPS's and combines it in one fantastic game.

87%Game Brain Score

story, gameplay

stability, monetization

85% User Score Based on 15,470 reviews

Critic Score 90%Based on 5 reviews

Platforms

Buy Nowfrom $27.94

Buy NowGet on Steam

About

Battlefield Bad Company 2 is a single player and multiplayer shooter game with a warfare theme. It was developed by DICE and was released on March 2, 2010. It received positive reviews from both critics and players.

Battlefield: Bad Company 2 is a first-person shooter game that offers a destructible environment and a variety of weapons. The single-player campaign follows a group of misfits fighting in a fictional war, while the multiplayer mode supports up to 24 players in diverse locations. The game is known for its intense vehicular combat and squad-based gameplay.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

85%

Audience ScoreBased on 15,470 reviews

story539 positive mentions

stability97 negative mentions

The game features an engaging narrative with memorable characters, blending humor and action effectively.
High replayability is offered through extensive customization options for weapons and vehicles, as well as enjoyable multiplayer modes.
The graphics hold up surprisingly well for a title released in 2010, with detailed environments and impressive destruction effects.

The single-player campaign is criticized for being short, linear, and plagued by numerous bugs and glitches.
Many players find the grinding required for progression to be tedious and frustrating, particularly for newcomers.
The game's stability issues and performance problems, especially on certain hardware, detract from the overall experience.

story
1,329 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
41%
50%
9%
The story of "Battlefield: Bad Company 2" is often described as entertaining yet somewhat cliché, revolving around a group of misfit soldiers on a mission to thwart a Russian threat involving a superweapon. While some players appreciate the humor and camaraderie among the characters, others find the plot predictable and the campaign short, typically lasting around 6 hours. Overall, the game is praised for its engaging narrative and memorable characters, making it a standout in the Battlefield series despite its linearity and occasional bugs.
- “This game has by far the best story of all of the battlefield games; it genuinely rivals even the original Modern Warfare titles.”
- “The story, while lighthearted at times, also manages to strike a balance with moments of seriousness and genuine emotional connection to the characters.”
- “The campaign is notable for its intriguing storyline and charismatic characters.”
- “As much as I love the story in Bad Company games, that is all it can offer; both campaigns are horribly unbalanced, almost rendering it way too annoying to even play through.”
- “The story remains pretty forgettable, far from the heights of late 2000s COD titles.”
- “The story is the most disappointing part of the whole game.”
gameplay
1,007 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
46%
48%
6%
The gameplay of *Battlefield: Bad Company 2* is widely praised for its engaging mechanics, dynamic destruction system, and balanced class dynamics, which create a fun and immersive experience. While some players note that the gameplay feels dated compared to modern shooters, many appreciate its unique blend of humor, tactical squad-based action, and environmental interaction, making it a standout title in the franchise. Despite occasional bugs and clunky movement, the game remains a beloved classic, offering a satisfying mix of single-player and multiplayer modes that continue to resonate with fans.
- “The gameplay itself is dynamic, with a variety of missions and scenarios that keep the player engaged from start to finish.”
- “Tight gameplay, well-balanced classes, great map design, and the amazing destruction system that allowed you to blow up entire buildings, which created very dynamic battlefields.”
- “The gameplay is smooth and rewarding, with a plentiful variety of weapons that feel like they have their place in a wide range of situations, giving you plenty of options as you approach each level and scenario you face.”
- “There are many noticeable gameplay bugs, some game-breaking, probably due to high FPS issues.”
- “The gameplay is very frustrating.”
- “The gameplay feels very static, and the levels are just boring.”
graphics
992 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
55%
41%
4%
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with many players noting that they hold up surprisingly well for a title released in 2010. While some describe the visuals as dated, others praise the detailed environments, destructible elements, and overall aesthetic quality, highlighting that the graphics remain impressive even by today's standards. However, there are mentions of occasional graphical glitches and performance issues, particularly in certain environments, which can detract from the experience.
- “Though the game is quite old, the graphics hold up quite well and I found myself enthralled and immersed in the action.”
- “The graphics are impressive, with detailed environments and destruction effects that stand out.”
- “The graphics hold up great to this day, the gunplay still feels amazing.”
- “Also, there were some graphical glitches in the cut scenes and some dust, sand, and snow effects were really strong, making it a challenge to see anything in this game sometimes.”
- “Graphically, it looks dated; some maps squeeze some fidelity like the South American forest level or desert level, but the game really shows its age with its lack of lighting and effects. Even the gun models look low-poly now for a 2010 game.”
- “The graphics are dated, the AI is buggy, and the campaign is very short (only about 8 hours at most).”
humor
297 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
1%
The humor in "Battlefield: Bad Company 2" is widely praised for its sharp writing, memorable characters, and engaging dialogue, which often provides a light-hearted contrast to the game's action-packed gameplay. Players appreciate the comedic banter among squadmates and the game's ability to blend humor with destruction, making for a fun and entertaining experience. While some feel the sequel is less humorous than its predecessor, it still delivers plenty of laughs and enjoyable moments throughout the campaign.
- “Unlike the more recent Battlefield campaigns that have tried to emulate the more serious 'tacticool' stories and gameplay of Call of Duty campaigns, the Bad Company series is humorous and light-hearted at its core.”
- “The characters are great and likable, it has a solid sense of humor without letting it mess with the serious parts, and it's just a fun campaign to play all around!”
- “The campaign is hilarious, epic, and outright fun.”
- “They try to be funny, but it just isn't.”
- “The humor falls flat and feels forced.”
- “I found the jokes to be more cringeworthy than amusing.”
music
112 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
58%
4%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising the high-quality sound design and nostalgic soundtracks, particularly in the Vietnam DLC, which features era-specific tracks that enhance the immersive experience. However, others note that certain combat sequences lack music, and some find the overall soundtrack repetitive or forgettable. Overall, while the music can elevate the gameplay, its presence and impact vary significantly throughout the game.
- “The soundtrack, a blend of adrenaline-pumping action and poignant melodies, was the perfect accompaniment to our most memorable battles.”
- “The music fits well, adding to the immersion and atmosphere.”
- “The soundtrack is the best of any game I've played, and it really gives me nostalgia whenever I hear it.”
- “Some combat sequences are surprisingly devoid of music.”
- “Music is sparse and the campaign uses the same track far too often again and again, but the acting is decent for what the game is.”
- “The single-player campaign is short, linear, full of bad dialogue, boring characters, and even worse music.”
stability
107 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
91%
The stability of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with users reporting numerous bugs, glitches, and crashes throughout their gameplay experiences. While some players noted that the game runs well on lower-end systems and can be enjoyable despite its issues, the overall consensus highlights significant stability problems that detract from the experience, particularly in the campaign mode. Many reviewers expressed frustration over the lack of support for these issues, suggesting a rushed development process and a disregard for quality control.
- “Even runs great on Steam Deck (but you do have to fumble around and map your own controller settings).”
- “The gameplay - nearly five years later - is still entertaining, and with the hardware requirements no longer near top end, the game runs great on most modern systems.”
- “It has a good campaign, has great multiplayer, and runs great on bad PCs.”
- “The campaign is buggy as hell.”
- “This game is very buggy and laggy, so it goes to show the developers are lazy.”
- “The single-player is still unfixed; there are too many glitches and bugs that I faced while playing the game that I don't know what's going on.”
optimization
75 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
41%
39%
20%
The game's optimization receives mixed reviews, with many players praising its ability to run smoothly on low-end systems and older hardware, while others report performance issues, particularly on Intel graphics. While some users highlight excellent graphics and minimal stuttering, others experience bugs and crashes, especially on outdated setups. Overall, the game is generally considered well-optimized for modern PCs, but performance can vary significantly depending on the hardware used.
- “Great game, very well optimized, also very smooth.”
- “The game can easily run on low rigs without any stutters or performance issues.”
- “The gameplay is insanely good and the game is really really well optimized, bought this game for like 4 dollars and it is the best 4 dollars I've ever spent.”
- “Badly optimized on Intel GPUs, causing crashes, bugs, and issues. I can't believe this is worse than BF3 with bugs; I had to restart this game like 10 times to get in the tank. Anyway, do not buy if you have Intel graphics or CPU.”
- “Now that those seem to be resolved, the game is still not fun and also runs kind of garbage for an 8-9 year old game, with a lot of random slowdowns and stuttering.”
- “It's very buggy, optimized poorly, and just isn't as much fun as it is when I play it on the console.”
atmosphere
65 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
66%
28%
6%
The atmosphere of the game is widely praised for its immersive qualities, combining stunning visual design, impressive sound effects, and detailed environments that enhance the overall experience. Players appreciate the game's ability to evoke strong emotions through its storytelling, character development, and dynamic gameplay, creating a unique and engaging atmosphere that keeps them coming back for more. Many reviews highlight the game's atmospheric soundscapes and environmental details, which contribute to a sense of realism and intensity, making it one of the standout titles in the shooter genre.
- “The sound design is equally impressive, with gunfire, explosions, and environmental destruction all contributing to the chaotic battlefield atmosphere.”
- “Incredibly detailed, incredibly atmospheric, the lighting, the drops of water falling off humid rocks whilst you traverse lakes in a boat while chatting with your squad.”
- “The atmosphere alone is incredible, making it feel and sound like you're really in the game.”
- “The game is okay, I guess; a saturated atmosphere with sound, particles, and invisible enemies coming from all sides.”
- “The single-player tries to rival MW2, yet unlike its competitor, it lacks any atmosphere, depth, or understanding of timing.”
- “People tend to buy this game when it's cheap, and they ruin the whole atmosphere.”
replayability
59 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
41%
49%
10%
Overall, the game boasts high replayability, particularly due to its extensive customization options for weapons and vehicles, as well as its engaging multiplayer modes that encourage teamwork and competition. Players appreciate the non-linear single-player campaign, which allows for varied strategies, and many find the multiplayer experience to be endlessly enjoyable, despite some concerns about server longevity. While some reviews mention diminishing replay value over time, the consensus remains that the game offers significant replay potential, especially with expansions like the Vietnam DLC.
- “The customization of weapons and vehicles, as well as the progression system, add depth and replayability to the multiplayer.”
- “Another strength of the game is its replayability and longevity.”
- “The game's multiplayer modes also provide a high level of replayability, as players can team up with friends or join online communities to compete against other players from around the world.”
- “Very linear gameplay with little replayability outside of PvP.”
- “This game was my go-to for multiplayer FPS for a long time; going back into it after many years, it has little to no replay value.”
- “Pretty funny game with great gameplay and physics - the game loses its replay value after some time.”
monetization
28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
11%
53%
36%
Overall, players appreciate the absence of microtransactions in the game, highlighting it as a refreshing change from the current trend in the industry. Many reviews express nostalgia for a time when games focused on quality without the burden of monetization schemes, emphasizing that the lack of in-game purchases enhances the overall experience. However, there are concerns about the future direction of the franchise, with fears that it may eventually adopt a free-to-play model laden with microtransactions.
- “Finally, a game without annoying microtransactions that just works and is actually fun.”
- “Good campaign and multiplayer with no microtransactions.”
- “Some of the most fun I've had in a FPS ever, plus no microtransactions, which is a plus.”
- “Back when EA and DICE focused on making high-quality games, microtransactions in multiplayer were just a tiny blip on the radar, but a harbinger of the toxic issues to come in the near future.”
- “Just wait before the franchise turns into a free-to-play game with microtransactions and before it invades the Android platform.”
- “Worse, they pre-sell the map packs and rope you into other microtransactions.”
grinding
28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
25%
71%
The reviews consistently highlight that grinding in the game is excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring players to invest an unrealistic amount of time to progress. While some players mention the existence of XP farming servers that can alleviate the grind, the overall sentiment is that the game's design leads to a frustrating experience, particularly for newcomers. Many feel that the grinding detracts from the enjoyment of both the campaign and multiplayer modes, making it a significant barrier to fully engaging with the game.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “There isn't much room for brand new players; there are XP farming servers to rank up fast, but aside from that, it's a deep learning curve for new players. Lastly, depending on where you live, the ping can get pretty crazy, making the few available servers slim pickings.”
- “Grinding to earn your weapons, etc., defeats rewards for skilled players. Instead, you are encouraged to drop a few hundred hours into repetitive map grinding to level up and memorize every inch of every map.”
- “Battlefield: Bad Company 2 is difficult to pick up and play, as it requires an obscene amount of grinding to give you any ability within the multiplayer, and the campaign is as boring and shallow as any other FPS.”
emotional
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a strong emotional connection to the characters, highlighting moments of genuine attachment and camaraderie throughout the game. While the narrative balances lightheartedness with serious themes, some feel that certain plot twists lack emotional weight, detracting from the overall experience. Overall, the game is praised for its ability to evoke feelings of teamwork and investment in the storyline, despite occasional comedic elements that may undermine the intended emotional depth.
- “The story, while lighthearted at times, also manages to strike a balance with moments of seriousness and genuine emotional connection to the characters.”
- “The storyline is so perfectly written, the Aurora mission at the start, set in WWII, then later in the campaign you find out what actually happened; after hearing what happened at the Aurora mission made me feel a little empty inside.”
- “Rarely has a shooter ever made me feel so much like a part of a team trying to win, not just boost stats.”
character development
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
17%
50%
Character development in the game is a mixed bag; while some reviews praise the sharp writing and humor that enhance the narrative, others feel it falls short, lacking depth in certain areas. The characters are described as flawed and humorous, contributing to a unique tone, but the overall development may not satisfy all players. Despite its brevity, the single-player story and main characters receive commendation for their engaging arcs.
- “The game effectively blends humor and action, delivering a captivating narrative that stands out for its sharp writing and character development.”
- “Singleplayer story is great, and the game's main characters are the best; their character development is also very good.”
- “It's an ok campaign, but the character development wasn't there and it felt short.”
- “Lasting less than 5 hours at best, on absolutely highest difficulty sports some comedic character development, military satire, and not much else.”
- “They are flawed, full of piss and vinegar and spout humor and character development instead of angst and cigar-chomping rage.”

Skip Critic Reviews

90%Critics’ scoreBased on 5 critic reviews

Skip Game Offers

Buy Battlefield Bad Company 2

78h Median play time

341h Average play time

7h Main story

17h Completionist

9-700h Spent by most gamers

*Based on 59 analyzed playthroughs

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Battlefield Bad Company 2

82%23.6kreviews

Battlefield 4

2014

Shooter

+11

93%13.3kreviews

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

2007

Shooter

75%6.8kreviews

Battlefield 3

2011

Shooter

72%1.6kreviews

Medal of Honor: Tier 1 Edition

2010

Shooter

86%48.1kreviews

Battlefield 1

2016

Shooter

More games like Battlefield Bad Company 2

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Battlefield Bad Company 2 is a shooter game with warfare theme.

Battlefield Bad Company 2 is available on iPhone, Windows, PC, Phone and others.

The main story can be completed in around 7 hours, while the entire game is estimated to take about 17 hours to finish. On average players spend around 341 hours playing Battlefield Bad Company 2.

Battlefield Bad Company 2 was released on March 2, 2010.

Battlefield Bad Company 2 was developed by DICE.

Battlefield Bad Company 2 has received positive reviews from both players and critics. Most players liked this game for its story but disliked it for its stability.

Battlefield Bad Company 2 is a single player game with multiplayer support.

Similar games include Battlefield 4, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, Battlefield 3, Medal of Honor: Tier 1 Edition, Battlefield 1 and others.

Battlefield Bad Company 2

Platforms