Battlefield 1

About

Battlefield 1 is a first-person shooter set in the context of World War I, offering a single-player campaign and multiplayer battles with up to 64 players. The Revolution edition includes the base game, Premium Pass with themed expansion packs, and additional content packs featuring hero-themed weapons and vehicles. Experience warfare through a variety of land, air, and sea vehicles in this critically acclaimed game.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

90%

Audience ScoreBased on 39,783 reviews

graphics1.5k positive mentions

grinding68 negative mentions

The graphics are stunning and immersive, effectively capturing the chaotic atmosphere of World War I with beautiful environments and realistic sound design.
The gameplay is dynamic and engaging, featuring large-scale battles and a variety of vehicles that enhance the overall experience.
The emotional depth of the campaign's storytelling, combined with a hauntingly beautiful soundtrack, creates a powerful and immersive portrayal of the human cost of war.

The game suffers from frequent bugs, crashes, and performance issues, particularly in multiplayer modes, which can disrupt the overall experience.
The campaign is criticized for being too short and lacking a cohesive overarching plot, leaving players wanting more depth and connection to the characters.
Monetization practices, including excessive microtransactions, have drawn significant criticism, overshadowing the game's quality and immersion.

graphics
2,206 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
69%
30%
1%
The graphics of Battlefield 1 are widely praised for their stunning quality and attention to detail, with many players noting that they still hold up impressively well even years after the game's release in 2016. The visuals effectively capture the chaotic atmosphere of World War I, featuring beautifully rendered environments, realistic lighting, and immersive sound design that enhance the overall gameplay experience. Despite some minor graphical issues reported by a few users, the consensus is that the game's graphics are among the best in the genre, often compared favorably to more recent titles.
- “The graphics are beautiful and fully immerse you into the chaos of WW1.”
- “The graphics are stunning, capturing the historical landscapes, while the sound design is incredibly engaging.”
- “For a game that launched nearly nine years ago, the graphics still look surprisingly great.”
- “This game is overrated, the graphics are really bad and the mechanism?”
- “I was hoping I could play with decent graphics settings since it's an older title, but I was wrong.”
- “Some levels, vehicles, and maps are cool, but the gameplay loop gets old really fast because of how bad the guns and visuals are.”
story
2,032 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
41%
54%
4%
The story in Battlefield 1 is presented through a series of "war stories," each focusing on different characters and perspectives from World War I, which adds depth and emotional resonance to the gameplay. While many players appreciate the engaging narratives and stunning visuals, some criticize the campaign for being too short and lacking a cohesive overarching plot. Overall, the storytelling is praised for its immersive quality, though the brevity of the missions and the focus on individual character arcs can leave players wanting more.
- “Whether it’s the endless dunes of the Sinai desert, the mud-clogged trenches of Verdun Heights, or the snowy expanse of Brusilov Keep, every map has a story to tell.”
- “The story is beautifully written and really engaging, making you feel like you're literally there amidst the chaos of war.”
- “Each chapter is led by a different protagonist, facing the conflict from different perspectives, adding depth to the storyline.”
- “The story is a bit too fast for me, because the characters just get thrown in with no explaining.”
- “Instead of a typical story, it's just separate chapters with different characters, making it hard to really care for them in the long run.”
- “The story mode was so boring.”
gameplay
1,994 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
48%
49%
3%
The gameplay of Battlefield 1 is widely praised for its immersive and dynamic experience, effectively capturing the chaos of World War I through a variety of engaging mechanics, including large-scale battles, diverse classes, and unique vehicles like behemoths. Players appreciate the balance between historical authenticity and enjoyable gameplay, although some express frustration with issues like vehicle dominance, matchmaking problems, and the presence of cheaters in multiplayer. Overall, the game is considered a standout in the franchise, offering a thrilling blend of action, strategy, and teamwork.
- “Every vehicle - from nimble cavalry horses to behemoth landships - feels painstakingly designed to remain true to the era while ensuring engaging gameplay.”
- “The gameplay is incredibly dynamic and engaging, with a focus on teamwork and large-scale battles that are truly epic in scope.”
- “The immersive gameplay makes this game one of my favorites; the historical accuracy and the different aspects of warfare involved make it chaotic yet so fun.”
- “The gameplay is fast-paced and thrilling, with a variety of different weapons and vehicles to choose from.”
- “The gameplay can feel slow and cumbersome, which, while somewhat reflective of the era, often translates to frustrating gameplay for those expecting the fluidity seen in more recent entries like Battlefield V and Battlefield 2042.”
- “Gameplay is weak and unimaginative.”
atmosphere
748 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
65%
34%
1%
The atmosphere in Battlefield 1 is widely praised for its stunning visuals, immersive sound design, and authentic representation of World War I, creating a deeply emotional and chaotic experience for players. Reviewers highlight the game's ability to transport them to the battlefield, with many describing it as the most atmospheric entry in the Battlefield series, characterized by intense gunplay and a haunting soundtrack that enhances the overall experience. Overall, the game's atmosphere is considered a standout feature, making it a must-play for fans of the genre.
- “The atmosphere, graphics, sound design, gunplay, everything is amazing.”
- “The atmosphere is incredible, transporting you back to the horrors and grandeur of World War I.”
- “The stunning visuals, authentic sound design, and intense gameplay create a hauntingly beautiful atmosphere that reminds players of the human cost behind historical battles.”
- “The atmosphere of this game, along with its haunting soundtrack and cryptic storytelling, pulls players into a dark, captivating world that feels alive in a way that Battlefield 1’s historical setting cannot.”
- “The screams of the soldiers, the epic soundtrack, the impeccable sound design – all of these things work together to create a gritty and dark atmosphere.”
- “The atmosphere in this game really is second to none.”
music
474 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
53%
46%
1%
The music in Battlefield 1 is widely praised for its hauntingly beautiful orchestral score, which enhances the game's immersive atmosphere and emotional weight. Composed by Johan Söderqvist and Patrik Andrén, the soundtrack effectively complements the chaos of World War I combat, creating a cinematic experience that resonates with players long after they finish the game. Many reviewers highlight the music as a standout feature, contributing significantly to the overall enjoyment and depth of the gameplay.
- “The soundtrack, composed by Johan Söderqvist and Patrik Andrén, is hauntingly beautiful, blending melancholy and intensity to complement the game’s tone.”
- “The music gives you goosebumps and the sound design is so good!”
- “The atmosphere, the soundtrack, and the sound design create an intense, moving atmosphere that allows players to feel the weight and urgency of the experience.”
- “The campaign is so badly done I don't even know how to explain it in words, the first thing I did was turn off the music because I don't want music blasting in my ears non-stop throughout an entire battle when I should be hearing gear jingling, grenades going off, enemy soldiers splashing through mud and screaming.”
- “You get none of that when you turn the music off, it's eerily quiet, the sounds of gunshots are always so distant it's like a real war is going on just 100 yards away from you at all times, except the battles are so completely empty that you quickly realize there is no war.”
- “The music, the movement, the bullets whizzing overhead as you dip into a trench....”
optimization
219 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
37%
47%
17%
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with many praising its ability to run smoothly on a variety of systems, including lower-end PCs, while others have reported significant performance issues, particularly after recent updates related to anti-cheat measures. While some players experience excellent frame rates and stability, others face stuttering, frame drops, and CPU strain, especially in multiplayer modes. Overall, the game's optimization is seen as decent but inconsistent, with room for improvement in addressing the performance issues that affect certain configurations.
- “The game is well optimized; even in intense fight situations with all graphic settings set to ultra, I got around 80 fps with my RTX 3050 (mobile) GPU, which is not the case with most AAA titles.”
- “The graphics are simply amazing, not only that but the game is very well optimized; sure, the lighting is broken on a map or two, but it still is above average, I think.”
- “The game is incredibly well-optimized for PC, and it shows.”
- “This game is an unoptimized mess.”
- “Awesome game, but the recently implemented anti-cheat has ruined performance.”
- “The optimization is garbage and you can't play anything but operations.”
grinding
199 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
2%
64%
34%
The grinding aspect of the game has received mixed feedback, with many players finding the process of unlocking weapons and equipment to be tedious and time-consuming. While some appreciate the slow progression and the challenge it presents, others feel it detracts from the overall enjoyment, especially when compared to options for purchasing shortcuts. Overall, the grind can feel excessive, particularly for those seeking to compete against more experienced players or to access better gear.
- “Little to no grinding is required to get the weapons you want.”
- “A bit grindy... sometimes.”
- “One long, tedious grind.”
- “It feels like it takes forever to unlock some of the better weapons and equipment, and sometimes it feels like you’re grinding more than actually having fun.”
- “I get that some people enjoy that slow burn, but personally, it can feel a bit tedious after a while.”
- “The game's progression system can feel grindy at times, and balancing issues in multiplayer can occasionally detract from the overall experience.”
stability
179 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
3%
84%
The game's stability has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting frequent bugs, crashes, and performance issues, particularly in multiplayer modes. While some users noted that the game runs well on modern hardware and has moments of polish, the overall experience is marred by glitches and technical problems that can disrupt gameplay. Despite these issues, some players still find enjoyment in the game, highlighting its fun elements amidst the instability.
- “The game itself runs well on modern hardware, and other than a very slow first launch, it has mostly been bug-free despite the EA launcher.”
- “Extremely polished, runs great on below average hardware, atmosphere is top notch, and gunplay is superb.”
- “Performance is very good, the gameplay feels smooth and bug-free and overall strikes an excellent balance between arcade and realistic.”
- “Spent an hour troubleshooting crashes before I could even play.”
- “Game automatically launches in windowed mode, and immediately starts this cut-scene/playable opening which is meant to be immersive, except the game stutters and essentially freezes every couple of seconds, making it an uphill fight just to switch to full screen.”
- “Incredibly buggy, crashes are frequent and FPS drops everywhere.”
emotional
179 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of "Battlefield 1" is widely praised for its deeply resonant storytelling and immersive campaign, which effectively captures the human cost of World War I through diverse narratives and character perspectives. Players report feeling a strong emotional connection to the characters and their experiences, often leading to moments of genuine sorrow and empathy. The game's atmospheric visuals and powerful soundtrack further enhance the emotional weight, making it a standout title for those seeking a poignant portrayal of war.
- “The single-player war stories campaign is a standout, offering emotionally resonant vignettes that explore the human side of war.”
- “The emotional depth of the campaign stories, combined with the raw power of the sound and visuals, truly gives you a sense of the scale and brutality of the Great War.”
- “The stories of their courage and sacrifice were truly heart-wrenching, and I found myself tearing up more than once as I played.”
humor
153 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
99%
1%
The humor in the game is often described as a mix of unintentional comedy and player interactions, with many finding the chaotic gameplay, glitches, and chat banter to be genuinely funny. While some reviews highlight the presence of toxic humor, including racism and homophobia, others appreciate the lighthearted moments that arise during gameplay, especially when playing with friends. Overall, the game is seen as a source of laughter, with players enjoying the absurdity of historical warfare combined with humorous player antics.
- “One minute, you’re laughing with your squad as you bayonet-charge together like some WWI boy band.”
- “It's history with a side of humor, explosions, and more action than a Hollywood summer blockbuster.”
- “The reloads are among the best parts, and with some of the builds that I run, it can be nonstop fun. Playing with a few buddies is only going to make it better, and if you try to do stupid or silly setups and/or strategies, it's most likely going to end in some of the most funny moments you'll ever experience in the game.”
- “Insignificant or contains humorous glitches.”
- “Not funny, didn't laugh.”
replayability
64 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
39%
56%
5%
The game's replayability is a mixed bag, with many players praising the multiplayer modes for their infinite replay value and dynamic gameplay, while the single-player campaign is often seen as less engaging and lacking in replay incentive. Mods and post-launch content enhance replayability for some, but others find the campaign and certain aspects of the game forgettable, leading to limited replay interest. Overall, the multiplayer experience is highlighted as a key factor for returning players, making it a highly replayable title for those who enjoy competitive play.
- “The campaign strikes an optimal balance between intense action and more reflective moments, making it thrilling and highly replayable.”
- “With its large-scale battles and diverse game modes, multiplayer offers endless replayability and opportunities for teamwork and strategy.”
- “The sandbox nature of the game allows for creative tactics and emergent gameplay moments that add depth and replay value to the overall experience.”
- “Forgettable with little to no replay value.”
- “Pretty mediocre map design and low replay value combined with a lack of real progression system.”
- “After 10 hours I'm totally bored, no replay value; if it cost more than 10 dollars, I'd demand a refund.”
monetization
44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
7%
43%
50%
The monetization aspect of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players expressing frustration over excessive microtransactions and intrusive advertisements, particularly from EA. While some users appreciate that certain content can be unlocked through gameplay, the overall sentiment leans towards viewing the monetization practices as greedy and detrimental to the gaming experience, often overshadowing the game's quality and immersion.
- “You don't need to do microtransactions, you can get everything just by playing.”
- “No sleazy monetization, not bullshit, just clean fun.”
- “The graphics are still great and on PC they look even better, the weapons are varied and a joy to use, the maps are colorful and interesting to look at and to top it off microtransactions are very minimal, just DLC which sometimes is given out for free or on sale.”
- “Disgrace of a Battlefield title, I am embarrassed for the devs. What a cash grabby, microtransaction-laden title; this is a disgrace to the franchise.”
- “Thanks for making playing the game worse with your new trash launcher and Battlefield ads that you keep shoving down our throats.”
- “Filled to the brim with microtransactions and a social feeling of missing out.”
character development
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
38%
25%
Character development in the campaigns is notably varied, with some players praising the cinematic storytelling and emotional depth, particularly in narratives like "through mud and blood," while others criticize the disjointed narratives and lack of emotional investment, leading to a disconnect from the characters. Overall, attention to detail in character design and environments is acknowledged, but opinions on the effectiveness of character development are mixed, with some finding it engaging and others feeling it falls flat.
- “The campaigns are a few hours long total but are extremely cinematic, and most of them have good character development.”
- “Each story offers a unique experience, from the gritty trench warfare of 'The Runner' to the emotional narrative of 'Through Mud and Blood.' The storytelling and character development are top-notch, and the campaign serves as a fitting tribute to the sacrifices of the soldiers of the era.”
- “Interesting story and decent character design; I like it.”
- “The disjointed narrative and shallow character development leave players disconnected from the events and fail to evoke any emotional investment.”
- “The stories are bad and there is no character development, nor did they manage to get me attached to any of them.”