Battlefield 1

88%
Game Brain Score Based on 28,638 reviews
  • graphics
  • gameplay
  • story
Battlefield 1 Game Cover
Starting at $2.79Buy now
Get on Steam Get on Xbox Games Store Get on PS Store

Battlefield 1 is a first-person shooter set in the context of World War I, offering a single-player campaign and multiplayer battles with up to 64 players. The Revolution edition includes the base game, Premium Pass with themed expansion packs, and additional content packs featuring hero-themed weapons and vehicles. Experience warfare through a variety of land, air, and sea vehicles in this critically acclaimed game.

  • PC
  • Play​station 4
  • Windows
  • Xbox One
  • Xbox Series X|S
  • Cloud
  • NVIDIA GeForce NOW
  • Play​Station
  • Xbox
  • Xbox Game Pass
  • x_box_cloud_gaming
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

88%
Audience ScoreBased on 28,638 reviews
graphics1,105 positive mentions
grinding47 negative mentions
  • graphics1,596 mentions

    The graphics of Battlefield 1 have received widespread acclaim, with many players noting that they remain stunning and competitive even years after its 2016 release. The game's visuals are praised for their realism, attention to detail, and immersive environments that effectively capture the chaos of World War I. Despite some criticisms regarding specific graphical glitches or performance issues on lower-end systems, the overall consensus is that the graphics are a standout feature, contributing significantly to the game's engaging experience.

    • “The graphics are so real; I half-expected my screen to start emitting the scent of virtual trench foot.”
    • “Even though this game came out in 2016, it still has incredible graphics and a beautiful soundtrack.”
    • “The graphics are breathtaking, with stunningly realistic environments, detailed character models, and jaw-dropping special effects.”
    • “Graphics are pretty ugly.”
    • “Black screen every 2 or 3 rounds, usually takes twice to boot the game (not even gonna mention boot time), stutters like hell I can't go above low settings otherwise my computer will burn, visuals and levolution effects aren't even as good as BF4.”
    • “The first thing I notice is that it's more graphic and I don't like playing it and the tank battles are really distasteful to play as in I don't want the game it looks bad and it shouldn't be in the store at that point.”
  • gameplay1,421 mentions

    The gameplay in "Battlefield 1" is widely praised for its immersive and intense experience, effectively capturing the chaos of World War I through a variety of modes, including large-scale multiplayer battles and engaging single-player campaigns. Players appreciate the diverse mechanics, such as the introduction of behemoths and unique class systems, which encourage teamwork and strategic play, although some express concerns about balance issues and the prevalence of hackers in multiplayer. Overall, the game is noted for its stunning graphics and sound design, contributing to a compelling and enjoyable gameplay experience.

    • “The gameplay in Battlefield 1 is both exhilarating and challenging.”
    • “With stunning visuals, intense gameplay, and a wealth of content, it's a must-play for fans of the franchise and newcomers alike.”
    • “Set against the backdrop of one of the most brutal conflicts in human history, Battlefield 1 combines stunning visuals, intense gameplay, and a gripping narrative to create a truly unforgettable gaming experience.”
    • “Character race, gender, facial structures, and basic gamer tag in multiplayer cannot be changed. You are given whatever they choose to give you. Instead, the devs chose to focus on gun and vehicle skins, clothes, and purchasable battle-boxes. The mechanics are 50/50 as well. When the game is running at peak, it is a fantastically clean game. But therein lies the problem; EA is not known for super smooth games because budget and time-frames for releases are their business model regardless of flaws. You will likely encounter many glitches.”
    • “The gameplay is ok but you can't use official servers because most of them are full of cheaters that will just instakill you on spawn, so the only option is to use community servers - good luck with the server browser.”
    • “Gameplay is weak and unimaginative.”
  • story1,412 mentions

    The story in Battlefield 1 is a collection of short, emotionally charged narratives that explore the experiences of various soldiers during World War I, each presented through distinct "war stories." While many players appreciate the game's immersive storytelling and stunning visuals, some criticize the brevity and lack of depth in the individual narratives, feeling that they could have been more fleshed out. Overall, the campaign is praised for its poignant portrayal of the human cost of war, despite some historical inaccuracies and a preference for multiplayer gameplay among the community.

    • “The storytelling is poignant, humanizing the conflict and leaving a lasting impact.”
    • “With its stunning visuals, immersive multiplayer, and emotionally resonant storytelling, it stands as a testament to the power of gaming as a medium for historical exploration and interactive storytelling.”
    • “Each story is expertly crafted, offering a diverse range of characters and situations that keep you engaged from start to finish.”
    • “However, the storylines that were chosen were not as factual as they propose to be but are 'based on historical events,' which basically means that they chose a real event/battle that happened and changed nearly everything else about it to fit their preferred story agenda that has nothing to do with the true overture of WWI.”
    • “The story mode is such a disaster with a weird mix of pro and anti-war propaganda for a game that can be summarized by 'shoot the baddies.'”
    • “The campaign story is disastrous with a weird mix of pro and anti-war propaganda for a game that can be summarized by 'shoot the baddies.'”
  • atmosphere541 mentions

    The atmosphere in Battlefield 1 is widely praised as one of its standout features, with players highlighting its immersive and authentic representation of World War I. The game's stunning visuals, exceptional sound design, and attention to detail create a gripping and chaotic environment that effectively captures the horrors and intensity of war. Many reviewers consider it the most atmospheric entry in the Battlefield series, making it a must-play for fans of immersive shooters.

    • “This game is a true masterpiece; I have never felt the atmosphere and the atrocities of war playing a shooter, and this game made me feel that.”
    • “The atmosphere is so realistic and exciting; it feels like you are really in the middle of a war field.”
    • “The atmosphere, visuals, and sound design are amazing, creating an intense and immersive experience.”
    • “The atmosphere cannot make up for the lack of depth in level design and every other place.”
    • “The atmosphere of this game is still unmatched to this day.”
    • “The sound design further enhances the immersion, with thunderous explosions, the crackle of gunfire, and the screams of soldiers creating a chillingly realistic atmosphere.”
  • music349 mentions

    The music in the game has been universally praised for its orchestral quality and ability to enhance the immersive experience of gameplay, with many players noting that it evokes strong emotions and complements the intense atmosphere of World War I. Reviewers highlight the soundtrack as a standout feature, often describing it as "epic" and "masterful," contributing significantly to the game's overall impact. While some players found the music to be overwhelming at times, the consensus is that it plays a crucial role in creating a memorable and engaging experience.

    • “The soundtrack is phenomenal with good variation.”
    • “The music, the scenery, the gunplay, the hit register, and the satisfying kill effect are all incredible.”
    • “The music really makes the difference from enjoying the game towards being fully immersed in it.”
    • “There is some music in the menus but none in the game itself.”
    • “The campaign is so badly done I don't even know how to explain it in words, the first thing I did was turn off the music because I don't want music blasting in my ears non-stop throughout an entire battle when I should be hearing gear jingling, grenades going off, enemy soldiers splashing through mud and screaming.”
    • “You get none of that when you turn the music off, it's eerily quiet, the sounds of gunshots are always so distant it's like a real war is going on just 100 yards away from you at all times, except the battles are so completely empty that you quickly realize there is no war.”
  • optimization152 mentions

    Overall, the game's optimization is highly praised, with many users reporting smooth performance and impressive graphics even on lower-end systems. While some players experience minor stuttering and performance issues, particularly in multiplayer modes, the majority find the game well-optimized, achieving high frame rates and stable gameplay. However, there are notable complaints regarding server stability and occasional performance drops, especially during intense gameplay moments.

    • “The game is optimized perfectly, graphics are insanely good.”
    • “Very well optimized, still has an active player base, unmatched atmosphere.”
    • “The graphics are very realistic and at the same time the optimization is at a high level.”
    • “The optimization is garbage and you can't play anything but operations.”
    • “Stuttering so bad that it makes me feel nauseous and every forum fix I tried did not get this game to a playable state.”
    • “Despite optimization concerns in multiplayer, the overall experience makes it a worthwhile investment for history enthusiasts and gamers alike.”
  • grinding151 mentions

    The grinding aspect of the game is frequently described as excessively time-consuming, with many players feeling that it requires a significant investment of time, often likening it to needing "a second life" to fully engage. While some players find the grinding enjoyable and rewarding, particularly when unlocking weapons, others express frustration over the tediousness and the feeling of being punished for not grinding enough. Overall, the consensus suggests that while grinding is a core part of the experience, it can detract from the enjoyment for many players.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “A bit grindy... sometimes.”
    • “One long, tedious grind.”
    • “I felt like I was immediately punished for doing anything else, and that makes learning the game so tedious and frustrating.”
    • “Grinding all day for nothing.”
    • “Would be a nice looking game, but the grinding to get decent weapons breaks it completely.”
  • emotional123 mentions

    The emotional aspect of "Battlefield 1" is widely praised for its deeply engaging storytelling and immersive war narratives, which evoke strong feelings of empathy and reflection on the human cost of conflict. Players report being moved to tears by the game's poignant war stories, which offer diverse perspectives on World War I, despite some critiques regarding character depth and campaign length. Overall, the game is celebrated for its ability to blend intense gameplay with heartfelt storytelling, creating a memorable and impactful experience.

    • “This game is a true masterpiece; I have never felt the atmosphere and the atrocities of war playing a shooter, and this game made me feel that.”
    • “The single-player war stories provide a diverse and emotionally charged journey through different perspectives of the war.”
    • “Each story offers a unique experience, from the gritty trench warfare of 'The Runner' to the emotional narrative of 'Through Mud and Blood.' The storytelling and character development are top-notch, and the campaign serves as a fitting tribute to the sacrifices of the soldiers of the era.”
  • stability120 mentions

    The game's stability is a mixed bag, with many players reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and server issues that can disrupt gameplay. While some users experience smooth performance and minimal glitches, others face significant problems, including crashes and unresponsive controls, particularly in multiplayer modes. Overall, the game is seen as enjoyable but marred by technical shortcomings typical of EA titles.

    • “Runs great, graphics look insane, and gameplay is just as intense on the Steam Deck as it was on Xbox.”
    • “Performance is very good, the gameplay feels smooth and bug-free and overall strikes an excellent balance between arcade and realistic.”
    • “It looks great even today, runs great even on modest hardware and feels generally pretty well balanced.”
    • “Frequent bugs, glitches, and server instability plague the multiplayer matches, leading to frustrating encounters and inconsistent performance.”
    • “The campaign is buggy and the controls are often unresponsive.”
    • “Game barely runs, and glitches constantly.”
  • humor111 mentions

    The humor in the game is widely appreciated, with players highlighting its comedic glitches, funny interactions, and the absurdity of certain gameplay moments, especially when playing with friends. Many reviews mention the game's ability to evoke laughter through its chaotic multiplayer experiences and humorous in-game events, despite some frustrations with bugs and cheaters. Overall, the game is seen as a source of unintentional humor, making it enjoyable for those who embrace its quirks.

    • “Grab your shovel and get ready for a mud-soaked, historically hilarious adventure where the real stars of the show are the players themselves.”
    • “So are hilariously fragile bombers (made of what seem to be oily rags), impractical tanks (with guns pointing in all the wrong directions), cavalry units (with swords), field guns (which leave you hilariously vulnerable but let you duck shit up), bayonet charges (including insane battlecries) and even giant zeppelins (which burn and change the environment when they are destroyed).”
    • “The reloads are among the best parts, and with some of the builds that I run, it can be nonstop fun. Playing with a few buddies is only going to make it better; not only that, if you try to do stupid or silly setups and/or strategies, it's most likely going to end in some of the most funny moments you'll ever experience in the game.”
    • “Insignificant or contains humorous glitches.”
    • “Not funny, didn't laugh.”
  • replayability41 mentions

    The game's replayability is a mixed bag, with many players praising its high replay value, particularly in multiplayer modes and single-player campaigns, which offer diverse experiences and opportunities for experimentation. However, some users note mediocre map design and limited progression systems that detract from long-term engagement. Overall, while many find it infinitely replayable, others express concerns about boredom setting in after a short period.

    • “The best battlefield game created, very fun and has great replay value.”
    • “Another strength of the game is its replayability and longevity.”
    • “With its large-scale battles and diverse game modes, multiplayer offers endless replayability and opportunities for teamwork and strategy.”
    • “Pretty mediocre map design and low replay value combined with a lack of real progression system.”
    • “After 10 hours I'm totally bored, no replay value; if it cost more than 10 dollars, I'd demand a refund.”
    • “Limited single-player campaign: while Battlefield 1's single-player campaign features a series of memorable vignettes set across different theaters of the war, its narrative depth and replay value pale in comparison to the game's multiplayer offerings.”
  • monetization31 mentions

    The monetization aspect of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players expressing frustration over pervasive microtransactions and advertising that detracts from the gaming experience. While some acknowledge that there are fewer microtransactions compared to previous titles, the overall sentiment is that the game feels like a cash grab, undermining its potential and historical authenticity. Players lament the shift towards profit-driven models, suggesting that the focus on monetization has negatively impacted gameplay and immersion.

    • “Far less microtransactions than BFV, and better gameplay, and less cheaters means this game is still 11/10.”
    • “The graphics are still great and on PC they look even better, the weapons are varied and a joy to use, the maps are colorful and interesting to look at, and to top it off, microtransactions are very minimal, just DLC which sometimes is given out for free or on sale.”
    • “10 times better and not cash grabby at all, unlike EA or Battlefield 1.”
    • “Disgrace of a Battlefield title, I am embarrassed for the devs. What a cash grab, microtransaction-laden title; this is a disgrace to the franchise.”
    • “The menu can't be reached unless you go through advertising for BF2042, which hurts immersion.”
    • “Filled to the brim with microtransactions and a social feeling of missing out.”
  • character development6 mentions

    Character development in the campaigns is notably varied, with some players praising the cinematic storytelling and emotional depth, particularly in narratives like "through mud and blood." However, others criticize the disjointed narratives and lack of depth, leading to a disconnect from the characters and their experiences. Overall, the quality of character development appears inconsistent across different stories.

    • “The campaigns are a few hours long total but are extremely cinematic, and most of them have good character development.”
    • “Each story offers a unique experience, from the gritty trench warfare of 'The Runner' to the emotional narrative of 'Through Mud and Blood.' The storytelling and character development are top-notch, and the campaign serves as a fitting tribute to the sacrifices of the soldiers of the era.”
    • “An impressive level of attention to detail was given to weapons, vehicles, character design, and field environments.”
    • “The disjointed narrative and shallow character development leave players disconnected from the events and fail to evoke any emotional investment.”
    • “The stories are bad and there is no character development, nor did they manage to get me attached to any of them.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Battlefield 1

Play time

23hMedian play time
161hAverage play time
8-150hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 87 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games