Battlefield 1

About

Battlefield 1 is a single player and multiplayer open world shooter game with warfare, historical and violence themes. It was developed by DICE and was released on October 21, 2016. It received positive reviews from players.

Experience the dawn of all-out war only in Battlefield™ 1. Fight your way through epic battles ranging from tight urban combat in a besieged French city to the heavily defended mountain forts in the Italian Alps or frantic combats in the deserts of Arabia. Use innovative weaponry and vehicles as you battle across the land, air and sea, and adapt your tactics to earth-shattering destruction. Discov…

Skip User Reviews

86%

Audience ScoreBased on 48,085 reviews

graphics1.8k positive mentions

grinding99 negative mentions

The graphics are stunning, showcasing detailed character models, realistic environments, and immersive sound design that enhances the gameplay experience.
The single-player campaign features emotionally charged narratives that provide a diverse range of perspectives on World War I, making it a compelling experience.
The multiplayer gameplay is engaging and chaotic, offering endless replayability with large-scale battles and strategic teamwork.

The campaign is criticized for being too short and lacking a cohesive narrative, with some missions feeling disconnected from one another.
There are significant issues with multiplayer balance and the prevalence of cheaters, which can detract from the overall experience.
The game's optimization is mixed, with some players reporting bugs and performance issues that hinder gameplay.

graphics
2,697 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
68%
31%
1%
The graphics of *Battlefield 1* are widely praised for their stunning quality and attention to detail, even years after its release in 2016. Many players note that the visuals remain competitive with modern titles, showcasing realistic environments, impressive lighting, and immersive sound design that enhance the overall gameplay experience. Despite some criticisms regarding gameplay mechanics and multiplayer balance, the game's aesthetic appeal and atmospheric representation of World War I are consistently highlighted as standout features.
- “The graphics are stunning, showcasing detailed character models, realistic environmental effects, and immersive sound design that brings the chaos of war to life.”
- “Battlefield 1 is a masterpiece of gameplay, graphics/presentation, music and overall fun.”
- “The graphics are breathtaking, with stunningly realistic environments, detailed character models, and jaw-dropping special effects.”
- “Graphics is not what I remember, even at max settings, not impressive. All the talk about Battlefield 1 having the best graphics for its time would be an understatement, but it tells a really good story about the First World War. I just wish the graphics were better; it would be more appealing to me if they were.”
- “The graphics are way better and mechanics, but like I said, if you can handle 5-10 cheaters a game then go and play it; it's cheap enough to just uninstall, so no worries.”
- “The graphics still hold up astonishingly well, the sound design is unforgettable, and the diversity of factions—Turks, Italians, Austro-Hungarians—adds unmatched flavor.”
story
2,524 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
41%
54%
5%
The story in Battlefield 1 is presented through a series of short, emotionally charged "war stories," each focusing on different characters and perspectives from World War I. While many players appreciate the immersive storytelling and historical context, some criticize the campaign for being too short and lacking a cohesive narrative, as it consists of disconnected missions rather than a single overarching plot. Overall, the game is praised for its stunning visuals and engaging gameplay, making it a worthwhile experience for those interested in both the story and multiplayer aspects.
- “The story is compelling, and the graphics are fabulous.”
- “The single-player campaign is emotional and well-designed, with each mission telling a unique story from different perspectives.”
- “Each story is expertly crafted, offering a diverse range of characters and situations that keep you engaged from start to finish.”
- “The campaign felt a bit short and the story missions hit uneven beats, but for big team battles, tanks, planes and sprawling maps it’s a blast.”
- “The story is short but sweet; the multiplayer is fun and the game is reasonably realistic for a game like this, which I like.”
- “The story mode is just gut-wrenchingly sad, the voice acting of all the characters and even the enemies is just terrifying and the multiplayer is just so amazing.”
gameplay
2,449 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
47%
49%
4%
The gameplay of Battlefield 1 is widely praised for its immersive and chaotic experience, effectively capturing the essence of World War I through a mix of infantry, vehicle, and aerial combat. Players appreciate the detailed mechanics, diverse gameplay styles, and the introduction of unique elements like behemoths, which add strategic depth to battles. However, some criticisms include issues with balance, the prevalence of cheaters in multiplayer, and certain gameplay mechanics that can feel frustrating or unrealistic, particularly for newcomers. Overall, the game is regarded as a standout title in the franchise, offering a blend of historical authenticity and engaging gameplay.
- “The gameplay rewards positioning, coordination, and tactical awareness more than raw reflex.”
- “The gameplay is fast-paced yet tactical, the visuals and audio are spectacular, and the multiplayer is endlessly replayable.”
- “Battlefield 1 masterfully combines historical authenticity with intense, large-scale gameplay.”
- “The gameplay is so much more detailed than the previous Battlefield.”
- “The gameplay mostly consists of you being alone against a few dozen enemies, even during moments meant to be big group attacks, you end up fighting alone.”
- “Gameplay-wise, the movement and gunplay are solid, but the WWI setting means some weapons feel clunky compared to modern shooters.”
atmosphere
980 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
64%
35%
1%
The atmosphere in Battlefield 1 is widely praised as one of its standout features, with players highlighting its immersive and authentic depiction of World War I. The game's stunning graphics, detailed sound design, and dynamic environments contribute to a gritty and chaotic atmosphere that effectively captures the horrors of war. Many reviewers consider it the most atmospheric entry in the Battlefield series, creating a unique and engaging experience that resonates with players long after its release.
- “Unparalleled atmosphere, sound design, and environments supplement gameplay perfectly and create a sense of immersion that I've yet to find in another game.”
- “The dark atmosphere is unmatched with incredible design, sound, and chaos that captures the feeling of war.”
- “The atmosphere, the chaos of battle, and the teamwork required all feel authentic and intense.”
- “The sound design in this game is unbelievable, the guns, the explosions, the soldier's screams and war cries, everything works so well to create this vicious and chaotic war atmosphere.”
- “The atmosphere of this game is unlike any other.”
music
580 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
52%
47%
1%
The music in Battlefield 1 is widely praised for its hauntingly beautiful orchestral score, which enhances the game's immersive atmosphere and emotional weight. Players appreciate how the soundtrack complements the intense gameplay and historical setting, making each battle feel epic and cinematic. Overall, the sound design, including music and effects, is considered top-notch, contributing significantly to the game's status as one of the best in the franchise.
- “The soundtrack will literally take you to another world — it captures the emotion and scale of war in a way few games can.”
- “The most immersive and fun battlefield ever made, the soundtrack alone is worth a purchase.”
- “The music is amazing, haunting, compelling.”
- “The campaign is so badly done I don't even know how to explain it in words, the first thing I did was turn off the music because I don't want music blasting in my ears non-stop throughout an entire battle when I should be hearing gear jingling, grenades going off, enemy soldiers splashing through mud and screaming.”
- “You get none of that when you turn the music off, it's eerily quiet, the sounds of gunshots are always so distant it's like a real war is going on just 100 yards away from you at all times, except the battles are so completely empty that you quickly realize there is no war.”
- “The atmosphere of the game, along with its haunting soundtrack and cryptic storytelling, pulls players into a dark, captivating world that feels alive in a way that Battlefield 1’s historical setting cannot.”
optimization
278 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
39%
41%
20%
Overall, the game's optimization has received mixed feedback from players. Many praise its ability to run smoothly on a variety of hardware, including lower-end PCs, and commend the impressive graphics and performance, especially in intense scenarios. However, some users report significant issues, particularly related to the anti-cheat software causing stuttering and performance drops, leading to a divided opinion on its overall optimization quality.
- “The game is well optimized; even in intense fight situations with all graphic settings set to ultra, I got around 80 fps with my RTX 3050 (mobile) GPU, which is not the case with most AAA titles.”
- “The graphics are simply amazing, not only that but the game is very well optimized; sure the lighting is broken on a map or two, but it still is above average.”
- “The game is extremely optimized in terms of FPS, improving even with ultra graphics.”
- “Overall the game looks beautiful but the lack of upscaling will require some settings tweaks and downgrades to get performance right.”
- “The game is poorly optimized; I can't even play on my external screen.”
- “This game is so poorly optimized that even though I am a fan of the gameplay, I will never bother with these types of games.”
emotional
268 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of "Battlefield 1" is widely praised for its powerful storytelling and immersive campaign, which features multiple short narratives that highlight the human cost of World War I. Players report feeling deeply connected to the characters and their experiences, with many noting that the game evokes strong emotions, including sadness and empathy. Despite some critiques regarding the brevity of the campaign, the emotional depth and historical authenticity resonate strongly, making it a standout entry in the series.
- “Battlefield 1 is the most aesthetically stunning and emotionally resonant entry the series has ever produced.”
- “The campaign is surprisingly emotional, and the multiplayer is chaotic in the best way.”
- “The single-player war stories provide a diverse and emotionally charged journey through different perspectives of the war.”
grinding
242 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
1%
58%
41%
The grinding aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players finding the progression system tedious and time-consuming, particularly when unlocking weapons and specializations. While some appreciate the sense of achievement that comes from grinding, others feel it detracts from the overall enjoyment, often leading to frustration and a sense of being forced into repetitive gameplay. Despite these criticisms, some players still find the game enjoyable enough to endure the grind, suggesting that the fun can outweigh the tediousness for dedicated fans.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “A bit grindy... sometimes.”
- “One long, tedious grind.”
- “The challenges ruined this game; they thought of the most tedious trials they could think of to unlock the top 50% of weapons.”
- “It feels like it takes forever to unlock some of the better weapons and equipment, and sometimes it feels like you’re grinding more than actually having fun.”
- “The game's progression system can feel grindy at times, and balancing issues in multiplayer can occasionally detract from the overall experience.”
stability
237 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
2%
86%
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with numerous users reporting persistent bugs, glitches, and issues with the EA app that hinder gameplay. Many players experience problems with launching the game, connecting with friends, and navigating the user interface, leading to frustration and significant downtime spent troubleshooting. While some users note that the game runs well on modern hardware, the overall consensus is that it remains plagued by technical issues that detract from the experience.
- “The game itself runs well on modern hardware, and other than a very slow first launch, it has mostly been bug-free despite the EA launcher.”
- “Extremely polished, runs great on below average hardware, atmosphere is top notch, and gunplay is superb.”
- “Performance is very good, the gameplay feels smooth and bug-free and overall strikes an excellent balance between arcade and realistic.”
- “The game's buggy as hell too.”
- “Major UI glitches, a pain to invite friends to parties, can't even load into games half the time.”
- “After many hours of troubleshooting, Reddit forums, and trying every possible solution, I was still unable to play.”
humor
170 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
99%
1%
The humor in the game is frequently highlighted as a standout feature, with players enjoying chaotic moments, funny glitches, and humorous interactions in chat. Many reviews mention the game's ability to create hilarious situations, especially when played with friends, and the community's penchant for witty banter, despite some instances of toxic behavior. Overall, the game is described as a blend of action and comedy, making it a memorable experience for players.
- “After 10 years, still funny.”
- “It's fun and actually hilarious to see some of the stuff you end up doing.”
- “Grab your shovel and get ready for a mud-soaked, historically hilarious adventure where the real stars of the show are the players themselves.”
- “Insignificant or contains humorous glitches.”
- “Not funny, didn't laugh.”
replayability
76 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
46%
50%
4%
Battlefield 1 is widely praised for its high replayability, particularly due to its engaging multiplayer modes and dynamic gameplay, which offer endless opportunities for varied experiences. While the single-player campaign is enjoyable and features some replayable missions, it is the multiplayer that truly shines, providing a rich environment for teamwork and strategy. Overall, players find the game to be visually stunning and fun, making it a must-play for those seeking a replayable experience.
- “Nearly a decade later, Battlefield 1 still holds up as one of the best entries in the series—visually stunning, emotionally resonant, and endlessly replayable.”
- “With its large-scale battles and diverse game modes, multiplayer offers endless replayability and opportunities for teamwork and strategy.”
- “The sandbox nature of the game allows for creative tactics and emergent gameplay moments that add depth and replay value to the overall experience.”
- “Forgettable with little to no replay value.”
- “The war stories were for the most part very good (the aerial one was dumb), but there isn't a lot of replayability.”
- “After 10 hours I'm totally bored, no replay value; if it cost more than 10 dollars, I'd demand a refund.”
monetization
58 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
5%
43%
52%
The monetization aspect of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many users expressing frustration over intrusive advertisements and a plethora of microtransactions that detract from the overall experience. While some players appreciate the reduced number of microtransactions compared to previous titles, others feel that the presence of in-game purchases and ads undermines the game's integrity, labeling it as a cash grab. Overall, the sentiment reflects a deep-seated dissatisfaction with EA's monetization practices, which many believe prioritize profit over player experience.
- “You don't need to do microtransactions; you can get everything just by playing.”
- “No sleazy monetization, not bullshit, just clean fun.”
- “The graphics are still great and on PC they look even better; the weapons are varied and a joy to use, the maps are colorful and interesting to look at, and to top it off, microtransactions are very minimal, just DLC which sometimes is given out for free or on sale.”
- “Disgrace of a Battlefield title, I am embarrassed for the devs. What a cash grabby, microtransaction-laden title; this is a disgrace to the franchise.”
- “Filled to the brim with microtransactions and a social feeling of missing out.”
- “If there were no microtransactions and loot boxes, this would be one of my favorite games.”
character development
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
40%
30%
Character development in the game is a mixed bag; while some campaigns offer cinematic storytelling and emotional depth, others suffer from shallow narratives that fail to engage players. The attention to detail in character design and environments is commendable, but inconsistencies in character arcs and disjointed narratives can leave players feeling disconnected. Overall, the game provides a tribute to the human side of war, though not all stories resonate equally.
- “The campaigns are a few hours long total but are extremely cinematic, and most of them have good character development.”
- “Each story offers a unique experience, from the gritty trench warfare of 'the runner' to the emotional narrative of 'through mud and blood.' The storytelling and character development are top-notch, and the campaign serves as a fitting tribute to the sacrifices of the soldiers of the era.”
- “The plot, character development, and game mechanics made me come back to the game on multiple occasions.”
- “It doesn’t always go deep enough with character development, and some missions feel a bit unbalanced, but overall, it’s a beautifully crafted tribute to the often-forgotten human side of war.”
- “The disjointed narrative and shallow character development leave players disconnected from the events and fail to evoke any emotional investment.”
- “The stories are bad and there is no character development, nor did they manage to get me attached to any of them.”