Atman:Rebel Flame

About

Atman:Rebel Flame is a single player and multiplayer casual strategy game. It was developed by JUP GAME and was released on March 31, 2024. It received neutral reviews from players.

If you have any questions or suggestions about the game, please discuss them within the official community of Atman Rebel Flame. We will have dedicated staff to respond promptly. New Player Gift Code: ATMANRISE! "Atman Rebel Flame" is a cyberpunk-style card-building game that supports multiplayer battles simultaneously, ensuring fairness with no out-of-game numerical growth. Each battl…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

42%

Audience ScoreBased on 19 reviews

graphics1 positive mentions

gameplay2 negative mentions

Cool concept and aesthetic.
Special effects and scenes are very brilliant for a free-to-play game.
Semi-decent deckbuilding mechanics.

Poor monetization model requiring expensive real money to unlock characters, making free-to-play progression frustrating.
Gameplay is boring and repetitive with lag, bugs, and slow combat, resembling a bad mobile port.
Lack of intuitive tutorial and unbalanced character ranking, plus locked core gameplay behind paywalls.

gameplay
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The gameplay is criticized for its restrictive pay-to-win model, where free-to-play players have limited access to characters and varied decks, unlike typical games that reserve money purchases mostly for cosmetics. Additionally, the tutorial is viewed as insufficient, failing to explain card mechanics, contributing to a generally boring gameplay experience.
- “I am kind of on the fence and would give it a 'not bad, not great' if I could, but as it is I am a little bit bemused; most games like this keep the gameplay mostly free and you can spend real money on cosmetics and non-pay-to-win stuff if you want to show support or really like a certain cosmetic (or spend money on 'tickets' or 'gold' and outright buy stuff straight away without grinding). But this game does the complete opposite as far as I can see and you can't actually buy any new characters without spending real money. Free-to-play players are stuck with the basic characters and are locked out of gameplay (since the characters have different decks and abilities). But the cosmetics can be purchased with free-to-play money... lol, what?”
- “The tutorial doesn't teach you why the cards are doing what they are doing, and the gameplay is boring.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization model is viewed negatively, with users expressing frustration and a desire for more genuine player engagement rather than AI opponents.
- “Bad monetization model.”
graphics
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The graphics feature a cool concept and aesthetic, but overall impressions are mediocre. Additionally, progression and unlocking new characters through in-game currency can be tedious, impacting the visual variety players experience.
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Grinding in this game is frustrating, as free-to-play players are stuck with basic characters and cannot unlock new ones without spending real money, effectively locking them out of key gameplay content. While cosmetics are purchasable with in-game currency, the inability to earn characters through grinding discourages casual players and disrupts the game’s progression balance.
- “Most games like this keep gameplay mostly free and let you spend real money on cosmetics and non-pay-to-win items, or buy stuff outright without grinding. But this game does the complete opposite: you can't buy new characters without spending real money. Free-to-play players are stuck with basic characters and locked out of gameplay since characters have different decks and abilities, while cosmetics can be purchased with free-to-play currency.”
- “It seems there was confusion in monetizing the game: free-to-play players are needed to play so whales have someone to compete against and feel good about their progress. But if there's no way for free-to-play players to actually get content, why would they keep playing?”