Are You Smarter Than A 5th Grader

About

With over 6,800 multiple-choice questions, true-or-false challenges, and minigames, you'll have the chance to challenge your proficiency in 24 different subjects, with topics like animal sciences, vocabulary, math, and more.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Local Multi-Player Play with friends in the same physical space using split-screen or multiple screens
2-Players Play with one other player, either online or locally, in a cooperative or competitive game mode
Multi-Player Compete or cooperate with other players online
Co-Op Team up with friends to complete levels or missions together
Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo
PvP Player versus Player - Fight against other players in real-time, often in arena-style combat
Split Screen Play with multiple players on the same screen, often with divided or shared screen real estate

Are You Smarter Than A 5th Grader screenshot

40%

Audience ScoreBased on 38 reviews

humor2 positive mentions

gameplay2 negative mentions

The trivia questions are interesting and fun to think over, providing a solid amount of options and unlockables.
The game has a charming presentation that will appeal to kids and families, making it accessible for all ages.
Gameplay follows the format of the TV show, which can be enjoyable for fans of the original series.

The pacing is incredibly slow, with excessive transitions and unnecessary padding that detracts from the experience.
Many questions are too easy, and the leveling system requires a tedious grind to unlock new topics, leading to player burnout.
The character hosts and children can be annoying, with limited voice lines that become repetitive and frustrating.

gameplay
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The gameplay is initially engaging and mirrors the format of the TV show, providing a solid experience for a trivia game. However, players find that it becomes repetitive and dull once they become familiar with the mechanics and layout, leading to a decline in enjoyment over time.
- “The game is fun for the first hour, but once you get familiar with the mechanics and layout, you realize how boring and backwards the game really is.”
- “Overall, the gameplay is relatively solid for a trivia game and somewhat follows the format of the actual TV show, but it does take a few liberties.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express frustration with the excessive grinding in the game, likening it to the South Park meme about World of Warcraft, where after countless hours of effort, they feel they can finally start enjoying the actual gameplay. This sentiment highlights a significant concern regarding the balance between grinding and meaningful gameplay experiences.
- “This game literally mirrors the meme from South Park where they grind World of Warcraft, and after hundreds of hours of grinding, can finally proclaim that they may now 'finally play the game.' This is that game!”
- “This game literally mirrors the meme from South Park where they grind World of Warcraft, and after hundreds of hours of grinding, can finally proclaim that they may now 'finally play the game.' This is that game!”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The reviews do not provide specific insights into the story aspect of the game, as they focus primarily on the user's personal goal of achieving 100% completion in trivia games on Steam. Therefore, there is no substantial commentary on the narrative or storytelling elements.
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is derived from the contrast between high expectations and the simplicity of junior school trivia questions, which some players find amusing. Fans of the original show appreciate the lightheartedness, even if the humor is unintentional. Overall, the game elicits a chuckle from its premise and execution.
- “To be fair, the fact that I had high expectations for a trivia game with junior school questions is funny. Still, as a fan of the original show and trivia itself, it seemed interesting to me.”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game's optimization is hindered by performance issues, which contribute to a slow pacing and frustrating character interactions, ultimately detracting from the overall experience.
- “Sadly, it's let down by the slow pacing, annoying character hosts, and performance issues mentioned.”
- “The game suffers from significant optimization problems, leading to frequent frame drops and long loading times.”
- “Despite its potential, the lack of proper optimization makes it nearly unplayable on lower-end systems.”
graphics
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The graphics are consistently praised for their vividness and sharpness, enhancing the overall visual experience of the game.
- “The graphics are incredibly vivid and sharp, bringing the game world to life.”
- “The attention to detail in the graphics is stunning, making every scene visually captivating.”
- “The vibrant colors and high-resolution textures create an immersive visual experience.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
Users note that the game offers a moderate level of replayability, suggesting that while it may not be highly engaging for multiple playthroughs, there are elements that encourage players to revisit it.
- “The game offers significant replay value, with multiple paths and outcomes to explore.”
- “Each playthrough feels fresh due to the diverse choices and character interactions.”
- “I love how the game encourages you to try different strategies, making every run unique.”
- “There is some replay value.”
- “The game lacks significant incentives to replay once you've completed it.”
- “After finishing the main story, I found little motivation to dive back in.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
The game, rated PEGI 3, features in-game purchases and is priced at £24.99, with a release date of August 23, 2022. Reviews indicate that while the base price is reasonable, the presence of additional monetization options may impact the overall experience for some players.
- “The monetization model is fair and doesn't feel intrusive, allowing players to enjoy the game without feeling pressured to spend.”
- “I appreciate that the in-game purchases are optional and don't affect gameplay balance, making it accessible for everyone.”
- “The pricing for additional content is reasonable, and I feel like I'm getting good value for my money.”
- “The in-game purchases feel excessive and detract from the overall experience.”
- “I was disappointed to find that many features are locked behind a paywall.”
- “The monetization strategy seems greedy, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending extra money.”