True or False

About

True or False is a single player action game. It was developed by Vladimir Maslov and was released on September 16, 2016. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

"True or False" is a trivia game that tests players' knowledge on a variety of topics with over 7,000 questions. Players must decide if the statement presented is true or false, with multiple difficulty levels and game modes to choose from. High score tracking and leaderboards add a competitive element to this solo or multiplayer game.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

65%

Audience ScoreBased on 513 reviews

graphics6 positive mentions

music9 negative mentions

True or False offers a simple and accessible trivia experience that can be enjoyed in short bursts.
The game features a variety of quirky and interesting statements that can lead to surprising 'aha' moments.
It's easy to achieve 100% completion, making it appealing for achievement hunters.

The game suffers from a limited pool of questions, leading to repetition and a lack of replay value.
Many statements are factually questionable or poorly worded, which can break immersion and trust in the game.
The lack of context or explanations for the answers diminishes the educational potential of the trivia.

music
31 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
52%
29%
The music in the game is described as calm and ambient, creating a relaxed atmosphere, but it suffers from repetitiveness and a lack of variety, with many users finding it boring or annoying over time. While some appreciate the soothing quality of the soundtrack, others criticize the limited number of tracks and the absence of volume control, which detracts from the overall experience. Overall, the music is seen as a mixed bag, contributing to the game's casual vibe but ultimately failing to engage players.
- “The calm background music and simple visual design amplify this accessibility by giving the game a relaxed, almost meditative tone.”
- “The background music is simple, but it fits nicely, and I love the 'cute' style they went with, having different animals bring the questions and such.”
- “This game has a lot of questions and a good enough music score to accompany it.”
- “But the music is very boring; the game is still interesting!”
- “I have to say, it needed to stay free... it has repeated questions and a repetitive soundtrack.”
- “Because of a super boring surface and just one song playing for the next hours, if you want to get 100% achievements.”
gameplay
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
70%
17%
The gameplay of "True or False" is centered around a straightforward mechanic of answering trivia statements, making it accessible and engaging for players of all ages. While the game offers two modes—quick and campaign—and features a diverse question pool, its simplicity and lack of narrative depth may leave some players wanting more. Overall, it provides a fun and educational experience, though some find it repetitive and lacking in challenge.
- “With its simple mechanics, diverse questions, and the thrill of testing one's wits, the game provides a fun and educational way to engage in solo or competitive gameplay.”
- “The game's mechanics are easy to grasp, making it accessible to players of all ages and skill levels.”
- “The simple true or false format allows for quick and engaging rounds of gameplay.”
- “The gameplay is simple and repetitive, and the game is way too short, even though it's less than a dollar.”
- “While the trivia questions are engaging, the lack of a narrative or additional gameplay elements might limit its appeal for players seeking a more immersive or story-driven experience.”
- “Stupid game with very many bugs and boring gameplay; all questions are random, no challenge, no stats or scoreboard, nothing. Thank god it is free.”
graphics
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
26%
61%
13%
The graphics in the game are generally described as simplistic and low-quality, primarily featuring cute vector art that lacks depth and variety. While some players appreciate the coherent art style and find it charming, many criticize the visuals as mediocre and reminiscent of a basic student project. Overall, the graphics serve their purpose but do not elevate the gaming experience significantly.
- “The graphics are rather simple but it works well.”
- “Its simple and has cute graphics!”
- “Smooth graphics and gameplay.”
- “While there are options to change the resolution for the game, all this does is scale up the simplistic low-quality vector art assets used to make the game, which makes little or no difference to the graphics quality.”
- “Without any other substantial graphics tweaks, it's not possible for gamers to improve the mediocre 2D visuals.”
- “As the graphics suggest, it feels and plays like a junior high student's computer class project.”
humor
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is widely praised, with many users highlighting its collection of funny and surprising questions that provide both entertainment and interesting facts. Players find it to be a fun, lighthearted experience, particularly enjoyable in social settings like parties, and appreciate the absence of crude humor. Overall, the game is seen as a delightful way to pass the time while learning quirky trivia.
- “True or false is a great knowledge game which taught me funny, interesting, and weird facts.”
- “Fun little question-based game; it's great to see questions and not know the answer. You take that one lucky guess, and I mean it's a hilarious riot at parties!”
- “The game has a lot of funny questions, and it's the perfect game when you're bored.”
replayability
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
50%
30%
Overall, the game's replayability is limited, with many players noting that it lacks substantial content and depth, making it feel thin and unsatisfying after initial playthroughs. While the competitive aspect and extensive question database provide some incentive for repeated play, the recognition of questions and minimal content lead to a consensus that it offers little in terms of long-term replay value.
- “The game's replayability comes from its extensive question database and the competitive aspect, as players can challenge friends or try to beat their own high scores.”
- “For those seeking depth, replayability, or polished design, its minimalism may feel more like a limitation than a strength.”
- “You could play it once by yourself, but it has no replay value.”
- “It doesn't add much replay value since you already will recognize the questions.”
story
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
17%
33%
The game's story is highly praised for its detailed and engaging narrative, with some reviewers even suggesting it rivals the storytelling of renowned titles like The Witcher 3. It features multiple story arcs and significant character development, evoking strong emotions and encouraging players to explore its depth further. Overall, the plot stands out as the highlight of the game, overshadowing other aspects like graphics and gameplay.
- “I have never been so into a game; the story is so detailed and interesting that it might just surpass The Witcher 3's story.”
- “Graphics were okay, gameplay was simple yet fun, but the plot is the highlight of this game.”
- “Plenty of story arcs and character development.”
- “I thought Donkey Kong was a true story. :c”
- “It's interesting, and we do live in an age where if you're curious about the full story behind something, you can Google it.”
grinding
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews indicate that while some achievements in the game can be easily obtained with minimal grinding, others require tedious and repetitive efforts that can lead to frustration. Players express dissatisfaction with the luck-based nature of certain achievements, which can make the grinding experience feel slow and featureless. Overall, the grinding aspect is seen as a mixed bag, with some players appreciating the ease of certain achievements while others find the process tedious and unfulfilling.
- “That's how long I spent grinding through the same stupid questions in order to get the Charlie Chaplin question to pop so I could get the last achievement.”
- “I've been trying for a freaking hour to answer this one question, but it still hasn't popped despite 7,682 instances of '61% of cats prefer opera over Korean pop music.' It's slow, repetitive, featureless, tedious... even the redeeming feature of easy achievements is kind of nullified by relying on pure luck.”
- “The one big plus about this game is that the badges are easy to obtain via campaign mode, and I don't have to waste my time grinding to get them.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with some users criticizing the presence of disguised advertising and bleak commentary on financial issues, while others appreciate the lack of intrusive ads compared to typical mobile quizzes. Overall, the experience is seen as less cluttered, but the thematic choices may detract from enjoyment.
- “Ain't it ironic? Literal advertising disguised as part of the game, and depressing quips about the state of the average person's finances in North America. If I wanted to think about hard economic realities, I'd look at my bank account.”
- “The monetization strategy feels exploitative, constantly pushing players to spend money to progress or enjoy the game fully.”
- “It's frustrating to see so many features locked behind paywalls, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending a fortune.”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
Overall, users find the game's stability to be generally good, with some noting it is not overly buggy. However, a few players have experienced glitches that detract from their overall enjoyment.
- “The game runs smoothly without any bugs.”
- “I haven't encountered any stability issues while playing.”
- “The performance is consistent, making for a seamless gaming experience.”
- “While the game has potential, the frequent crashes make it nearly unplayable.”
- “I love the concept, but the constant bugs and instability really detract from the experience.”
- “The game is fun, but the numerous glitches and lag issues are frustrating.”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players report that the game evokes strong emotions, with many stating it made them cry, highlighting its impactful storytelling and character development.
- “This game made me cry.”
- “The emotional depth of the story left a lasting impact on me.”
- “I felt a strong connection to the characters, which made the experience incredibly moving.”
character development
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game features a rich array of story arcs that contribute significantly to character development, allowing players to engage deeply with the characters' growth and transformations throughout the narrative.
- “The game features plenty of story arcs and character development.”
- “The depth of character development really enhances the overall narrative experience.”
- “I love how each character evolves throughout the game, making their journeys feel personal and impactful.”