Ages of Conflict World War Sim

About

Ages of Conflict World War Sim is a single player simulation game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Ages of Conflict World War Sim is a single-player simulation game that lets you simulate wars across an infinite number of worlds. Players engage in strategic battles, managing various aspects of warfare and tactics. However, the experience is somewhat hindered by the presence of too much advertisement.

Genres & Tags

Simulation

Play Modes

Single-Player

Ages of Conflict World War Sim screenshot

Skip User Reviews

75%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,260 reviews

graphics4 positive mentions

monetization51 negative mentions

The game offers a unique and enjoyable simulation experience that allows players to create and observe various war scenarios.
The graphics and animations are well done, making the gameplay visually appealing.
Frequent updates add new features and improvements, enhancing the overall experience.

A significant amount of content is locked behind a paywall, making it difficult for free users to fully enjoy the game.
The game is plagued by ads, which can disrupt gameplay and lead to frustration.
Many players report bugs and crashes, particularly when trying to access certain features or scenarios.

monetization
56 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
7%
2%
91%
The monetization aspect of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with users expressing frustration over the excessive number of ads and the prevalence of paywalls that restrict access to features. Many players feel that the free version is nearly unplayable due to constant interruptions from ads, while others criticize the necessity of purchasing the full version to enjoy a more complete experience. Overall, the monetization strategy is seen as detrimental to gameplay enjoyment, leading to a significant number of uninstalls and dissatisfaction among free-to-play users.
- “This is my favorite game! I simulate wars, and it's a fun game if you have no Wi-Fi. No ads make it even better since it's offline.”
- “The game is good and all but too many features are behind a paywall, too many ads & you have to pay for the mobile version even if you own the PC one.”
- “Honestly, there are too many ads and this game isn't fun without buying it.”
- “The amount of ads is driving me crazy and why do I have to pay £5 for the game to be good? Do not recommend for free-to-play users like me.”
gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
24%
38%
The gameplay is generally praised for its engaging mechanics and unique war generation system, distinguishing it from other simulation games. However, many users express frustration over significant content being locked behind a paywall, as well as a lack of geographical realism and political elements that could enhance the experience. Despite these drawbacks, the game is still considered enjoyable and well-designed by some players.
- “I love the actual gameplay, how wars are generated and not regulated to provinces like in other games. It's just sad that most of it is behind a paywall, especially for the simple stuff like the ability to unlock pre-made scenarios.”
- “The entire gameplay is great; in fact, it is the best simulation game I can find or have ever played. However, the game doesn't take any attention to geographical details, like what resources would be readily available to the people of that area, and controlling another country doesn't actually impact the gameplay.”
- “The game is great for me! I don't think it has ads, and it has a nice UI and good mechanics. I would like the revolt borders to be cleaner, but overall, it's a very good game. Highly recommend!”
- “I paid money for the full version until there was an error and my purchase was reverted back; there was no mechanic to restore the purchases and my money is wasted.”
- “Just ruins the gameplay.”
- “It's one of those games that has a genre but it needs money for the actual gameplay of the genre.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
50%
The graphics of the game are generally praised for their quality and appeal, making it a standout feature for many players. However, some users express frustration over the lack of control and geographical accuracy, as well as the monetization aspects that limit gameplay experiences. Overall, while the visuals are well-received, the game's reliance on paid features detracts from the enjoyment for some players.
- “This game has got to be my most favorite wargame because of its graphics and overall design, and it doesn't have that many ads like some others do.”
- “Game graphics and animations are great, but it's unfortunate that most features cost money. I think this game should be free so players can truly enjoy it.”
- “I like the graphics, though.”
- “The graphics are outdated and lack the detail expected from modern games.”
- “The visual effects are underwhelming and do not enhance the overall experience.”
- “Character models look bland and lack any real personality or depth.”
stability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is a significant concern for users, with frequent freezing and unresponsiveness reported, particularly when capturing multiple capitals. Many players express frustration over bugs that disrupt gameplay, especially after investing in the premium version, and the excessive ads further detract from the experience. Overall, while the game has potential, its stability issues hinder enjoyment.
- “A great game, but whenever I capture half of the world, the game freezes, which I don't like.”
- “It's a really good game, but it gets very buggy when you get a lot of capitals, and you need to pay $5 for the full game. The number of ads you get at the start is absurd.”
- “I got like 5 ads in the span of 30 seconds, and it's unresponsive as hell. You're not allowed to play if you don't have $5. Even with premium, it is still buggy and unresponsive.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
The game's optimization has been criticized for poor performance, particularly during large-scale conflicts, where frame rates can drop significantly to 9 fps. Additionally, users have noted issues with the user interface being too small and a lack of engaging features, which detracts from the overall experience.
- “The optimization in this game is impressive, allowing for smooth gameplay even during intense battles.”
- “I appreciate how the developers have focused on performance, ensuring that the game runs well even with multiple players involved.”
- “The game handles large-scale conflicts efficiently, maintaining a steady frame rate that enhances the overall experience.”
- “I have a few issues with this game, like the UI being really small, to the point where you don't know what you clicked. Additionally, the performance suffers significantly; if multiple countries attack each other, the game can drop down to 9 FPS, which is quite annoying.”
- “The optimization is lacking; the game frequently lags during large battles, making it nearly unplayable at times.”
- “I find the game struggles to maintain a stable frame rate, especially when there are many players on screen. It really detracts from the overall experience.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The music in the game is generally praised for its beauty, though some users find it a bit obnoxious at times. Overall, it enhances the gaming experience, but there are concerns about limitations without additional purchases.
- “It has beautiful music and the AI is smart.”
- “It's too good, everything, the music, the everything else. I just wish it was more free, although it's a good game. The thing I like most is that it can be played offline too, which is like a gift descended from the sky in case of games nowadays.”
- “The music is a bit obnoxious and without the $5 pass, the experience is very limited.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The story aspect of the game is generally well-received, particularly for its engaging plot twists that appeal to geography enthusiasts, although players note that experiences may vary significantly by region.
- “Every game with different plot twists is really fun and entertaining, especially for geography nerds.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the map-making process somewhat tedious and express a desire for AI-generated maps to enhance gameplay variety and reduce grinding.
- “It's a bit tedious to make maps, and it'd be cool to have AI-generated maps to play on.”

Skip Game Offers

Buy Ages of Conflict World War Sim

Ages of Conflict World War Sim
See offer on Play Store

Skip Games Like Ages of Conflict World War Sim

65%1.3kreviews

Age of History II Lite

2019

Casual Strategy

69%5.9kreviews

Strategy & Tactics－Sandbox

Strategy

82%2.3kreviews

Age of Conquest IV

2016

Turn-based Strategy

87%8.8kreviews

Age of History II

2018

Casual Turn-based Strategy

85%1.1kreviews

World Provinces: Empire Map

Casual Simulation

More games like Ages of Conflict World War Sim

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Ages of Conflict World War Sim is a simulation game.

Ages of Conflict World War Sim is available on Phone and Tablet.

Ages of Conflict World War Sim was developed by JoySpark Games.

Ages of Conflict World War Sim has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its monetization.

Ages of Conflict World War Sim is a single player game.

Similar games include Age of History II Lite, Strategy & Tactics－Sandbox, Age of Conquest IV, Age of History II, World Provinces: Empire Map and others.

Ages of Conflict World War Sim

Platforms

About

Buy Ages of Conflict World War Sim