After Inc.

About

"After Inc." is a strategy game where players engage in post-pandemic rebuilding as the sequel to "Plague Inc." Experience ingenious game mechanics, managing resources, and combating challenges in a single-player mode. Explore the aftermath and craft a new world in the wake of global disaster.

Genres & Tags

Strategy

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

92%

Audience ScoreBased on 345 reviews

gameplay13 positive mentions

optimization3 negative mentions

The game has a great concept and combines elements from previous titles like Plague Inc and Rebel Inc, making it engaging and fun.
It runs smoothly with beautiful graphics, and many players appreciate the depth and strategic value of the gameplay.
The developer has shown responsiveness to feedback, and there is potential for future updates and expansions to enhance the game further.

The game suffers from balancing issues, with many players feeling overwhelmed by the number of mechanics to manage at once.
A significant amount of content is locked behind paywalls, leading some to feel that the game is more of a demo than a complete experience.
The user interface is often criticized for being cluttered and not intuitive, making it difficult for players to navigate and understand the game mechanics.

gameplay
27 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
48%
41%
11%
The gameplay is a blend of mechanics from "Plague Inc." and "Rebel Inc.," offering a familiar yet innovative experience that emphasizes strategic decision-making and resource management. While many players appreciate the depth and fun of the mechanics, some feel that the game leans too heavily on its predecessors, suggesting a need for more original elements and distinct animations. Overall, the gameplay is described as enjoyable, with a relaxed loop and impactful choices, making it a solid addition to the genre.
- “Very good, the mechanics and gameplay being a mixture of Plague Inc. and Rebel Inc. as well as taking place after Plague Inc. is really cool and innovative.”
- “The gameplay loop is enjoyable and much more relaxed than Rebel Inc.”
- “While this does play very similar to both Plague Inc. and Rebel Inc., they still find creative ways to make the gameplay feel unique.”
- “It feels like the entire gameplay is too similar to Rebel Inc.”
- “Try adding more original mechanics, sacrifice some of them, and perhaps touch more on animation that would distinguish the game instead of making it Rebel Inc.”
- “Non-Rebel Inc players won't know the economist's gameplay shift from vague descriptions.”
story
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
42%
25%
The game's story is engaging, featuring a unique blend of survival elements and mission-based gameplay set in a zombie-infested world. Players appreciate the quality of the narrative and visuals, although some express frustration with the monetization model that requires payment to access additional content after completing the initial missions. Overall, the storyline is well-received, with comparisons drawn to other popular games like Rebel Inc. and Plague Inc.
- “The survival rewards you get after every mission in the campaign are unique to this game.”
- “Great implementation of monetization, and overall the quality of visuals and story is top tier; great seeing your little fighters go clean up some zombie-infected areas.”
- “It's a very good game; the storyline is good and so is the gameplay. Please do not stop making games.”
- “It's pretty good overall, but I don't like how you have to pay to continue your town after you finish all missions.”
- “Normal difficulty is more difficult than brutal; I can't even finish half of the quests on normal.”
- “While continuing the story of Plague Inc.”
graphics
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
25%
25%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the art style and overall visual quality, while others criticize it for being poorly optimized and reminiscent of low-quality mobile games. Many appreciate the unique design and humor, though there are concerns about the use of AI-generated art and a saturated color palette that detracts from the post-apocalyptic theme. Overall, while some find the graphics enjoyable and fitting, others feel they fall short of expectations.
- “Great implementation of monetization, and overall the quality of visuals and story is top tier. It's great seeing your little fighters go clean up some zombie-infected areas.”
- “I like the design and art style.”
- “Graphics maintain that Plague Inc. vibe, while still being a completely new game!”
- “The game is good but it's not optimized; I'm playing this game on a new phone and the graphics are set to battery saver+, but it stutters a lot.”
- “I kinda don't like the graphics; they remind me of those cheap cash-grabby mobile games (that bland font and UI especially). It just doesn't fit the vibe of a post-apocalyptic world ridden with a deadly zombie plague, and it kinda hurts my eyes with how saturated it is.”
- “I wish the art didn't use any AI-generated stuff. I don't like that aspect; other than that, the art style was very pretty.”
monetization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
50%
The monetization model of the game is generally well-received, with players appreciating the absence of intrusive ads and enjoying the gameplay. However, some users express frustration over the abundance of in-app purchases for minor items, suggesting a potential imbalance in the monetization strategy. Overall, the game strikes a positive note with its ad-free experience while facing criticism for its in-app purchase system.
- “Very fun, no ads!”
- “A little hard but fun with no ads.”
- “So far so good, also no ads!”
- “This is the zombie survival game we all wanted, but the monetization is a letdown compared to the expectations set by the advertisements.”
- “The monetization model feels exploitative, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending extra money.”
- “While the game is fun, the constant push for in-game purchases detracts from the overall experience.”
replayability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Overall, the game's replayability is mixed; while some players find it fun and engaging for a short period, others feel it lacks significant replay value after completion. It is considered enjoyable, particularly for a mobile game, but its limited duration may deter players from returning.
- “Fun, (not too) easy, and very replayable!”
- “Dunno about replay value but it's fun, especially for a mobile game.”
- “The game is completed after a couple of hours and there is no replayability.”
- “I don't think there is a ton of replay value, but it is definitely worth playing for a while!”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game suffers from optimization issues, as players report significant stuttering even on new devices with graphics settings adjusted to battery saver mode.
- “The game is good, but it's not optimized. I'm playing this game on a new phone, and the graphics are set to battery saver+, yet it stutters a lot.”
- “The performance issues are frustrating; even on high-end devices, the game struggles to maintain a steady frame rate.”
- “I expected better optimization for such a popular title, but the frequent lag and long loading times make it hard to enjoy.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Reviewers highlight the game's humor as a standout feature, complementing its excellent artwork and engaging mechanics. The humor adds a delightful layer to the overall experience, enhancing player enjoyment.
- “The humor in this game is top-notch, making every moment enjoyable.”
- “I love how the witty dialogue and funny scenarios keep me laughing throughout the game.”
- “The combination of excellent artwork and humor creates a truly entertaining experience.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game has received positive feedback, with players particularly enjoying the soundtrack.
- “I just downloaded this game, and so far, I really like the soundtrack.”