AeroChopper

About

AeroChopper is a single player casual racing game. It was developed by Brandon Cobb and was released on April 29, 2018. It received positive reviews from players.

AeroChopper is a 2D single-player side-scroller survival game where the player controls a vehicle that can transform between helicopter and airplane modes.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

82%

Audience ScoreBased on 11 reviews

graphics3 negative mentions

Engaging gameplay with dynamic helicopter missions and a variety of tasks and modes that keep interest alive.
Bright graphics and fitting sound design enhance the overall experience, adding tension to the gameplay.
The game is free to play, showcasing the developers' dedication to making it accessible to a wider audience.

The game has technical roughness and feels more like a mobile app than a serious PC game, lacking significant appeal for PC gamers.
Learning the mechanics can be challenging, potentially deterring newcomers from fully enjoying the game.
Some upgrades are one-time use, leading to frustrating gameplay experiences and extended playtime without sufficient reward.

graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
75%
The graphics are described as simplistic and reminiscent of early 2000s Newgrounds games, lacking any significant enhancements or customization options. Comparatively, even basic mobile games like Temple Run offer more advanced visuals and gameplay.
- “It's a simple game with minimal graphics, reminiscent of a 2005 era Newgrounds game, but that's not the issue here.”
- “There's nothing in the way of graphics tweaks or enhancements.”
- “It's a simple game, with a very minimal build on graphics, looking like a 2005 era Newgrounds game, but that's not the problem here.”
- “There's nothing in the way of graphics tweaks or options.”
- “Even mobile app endless runners like Temple Run feature more sophisticated graphics and gameplay.”
gameplay
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Reviewers note that the gameplay lacks sophistication, especially when compared to mobile endless runners like Temple Runner, which offer more advanced graphics and mechanics.
- “Even mobile app endless runners like Temple Run feature more sophisticated graphics and gameplay.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The reviews indicate that the story is either unclear or lacking depth, with some users questioning its coherence and overall impact. Many feel that it does not significantly enhance the gameplay experience, leaving them wanting more in terms of narrative development.
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Reviewers suggest that the game's monetization strategy could have been improved by targeting mobile gamers through app stores, potentially increasing revenue through advertising impressions.
- “The monetization strategy feels overly aggressive, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending money.”
- “I feel the developers might have done better releasing this on app stores where they could find an appropriate target audience (mobile gamers), and even get paid for their effort through advertising impressions.”
- “The in-game purchases are not just optional; they are almost necessary to progress, which ruins the experience.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players indicate that grinding in the game can be quite demanding, often requiring significant time investment or additional lives to progress effectively.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “The grinding feels endless and tedious.”
- “I spent hours grinding, and it felt like I made no progress.”