Skip to main content
A tractor Game Cover

About

A tractor is a multiplayer casual strategy game. It was developed by Games for May and was released on August 15, 2018. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

An old-fashioned, serious, social-economic simulation game that combines trading, vehicles, mini-games and blowing things up. And tractors.

Skip User Reviews

77%
Audience ScoreBased on 105 reviews
humor1 positive mentions
monetization3 negative mentions

  • The game offers a unique and relaxing experience with a player-driven economy, allowing for casual gameplay and social interaction.
  • The community is dedicated and helpful, making it easier for new players to learn the game despite its lack of tutorials.
  • Many players find the game to be a nostalgic gem, recalling fond memories from their childhood and appreciating its quirky charm.
  • The game suffers from significant technical issues, including server downtime and loading problems, making it unplayable for many users.
  • There is a lack of direction for new players, with no tutorial and a confusing interface that can lead to frustration.
  • The game has been criticized for its pay-to-win mechanics, which can hinder progress for free players and create an unbalanced experience.
  • gameplay
    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is characterized by a limited daily engagement, primarily revolving around economic mechanics that some players find engrossing, while others criticize the heavy pay-to-win elements that detract from the experience. Many users feel that the game is designed as a cash grab, with a focus on microtransactions that undermine the potential for free players to enjoy the full experience. Overall, the gameplay is seen as unfinished and misleading, leading to dissatisfaction among the community.

    • “- intensely engrossing economy gameplay mechanic which is fun to learn and play with”
    • “After about 20 hours of playing the game, I have a good understanding of the gameplay, the community, and where the game will be in a couple of years.”
    • “Personally, I greatly disagree with this mechanic in a game built around building an empire of business and opportunity.”
    • “Gameplay-wise, it doesn't really have much to offer; it is a game that you play about once a day to do stuff and then log off.”
    • “In the game's current state, it is heavily pay to win, which I think was the idea in the first place. It seems like a cash grab with falsely advertised gameplay to lure in players.”
    • “I'm tired of false advertisement and microtransactions affecting the gameplay.”
  • graphics
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some users describing them as "laughably bad" and simplistic, which detracts from the overall experience. However, others find the visuals impressive and integral to the game's appeal, suggesting that the graphics may not reflect the game's hidden depth and quality. Overall, opinions vary widely, indicating a polarized reception regarding the game's visual presentation.

    • “Don't let the graphics or title fool you -- this title is a hidden gem.”
    • “Best game of all time, the graphics speak for themselves.”
    • “When I loaded up the game, I was initially worried about the limited visual options in the main menu, but once I started playing, I was blown away by the stunning graphics.”
    • “Laughably bad graphics; aside, an attempt was made to create a cash shop with a thin veneer of a multiplayer economic sim draped around it.”
    • “If it could, the laughably bad, phoned-in graphics would easily deter gamers from taking this seriously.”
    • “This is an older title with simplistic graphics.”
  • monetization
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization aspect of the game has received criticism for its reliance on microtransactions, which some players feel are essential for success, leading to a "pay to win" environment. Many reviews suggest that the game appears unfinished and prioritizes profit through in-game purchases over player experience, contributing to a perception of it being a cash grab.

    • “The problems with it are all minor; however, it sometimes feels that microtransactions are essential.”
    • “In the game's current state, it is heavily pay-to-win, which I think was the idea in the first place. It seems like a cash grab with falsely advertised gameplay to lure in players.”
    • “I cannot recommend a game in this state (completely unfinished) where the developer is working on microtransactions, skins, and useless crap like that, while also having this 'pay to win' mechanic.”
    • “Some of the negative reviews come from the in-game purchases.”
  • grinding
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players view the grinding aspect of the game as integral to its sandbox trading and farming simulator mechanics, enhanced by survival elements and mini-games. While some negative reviews stem from misunderstandings of the game's nature, those who appreciate a multiplayer economy find the grinding rewarding and engaging.

    • “The grinding in this game feels endless and repetitive, making it hard to stay engaged.”
    • “I found myself spending hours on mindless tasks just to progress, which quickly became frustrating.”
    • “The grind is so tedious that it overshadows the fun elements of the game, turning it into a chore.”
  • stability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game is enjoyable, but players frequently report experiencing significant glitches that affect stability.

    • “This game is actually fun, but it glitches a lot.”
    • “The frequent crashes make it hard to enjoy the gameplay.”
    • “I keep experiencing random freezes that ruin the experience.”
  • story
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story is highly praised for its emotional depth and character development, creating intense suspense that keeps players engaged. The impactful ending leaves a lasting impression, showcasing the game's ability to evoke strong feelings. Overall, it is described as a significant and immersive narrative experience.

    • “Never been more tense in my life, and the ending brought a tear to my eye. Getting to know the characters and their backstory, the game was an immense undertaking with immense suspense throughout.”
    • “Never been more tense in my life and the ending brought a tear to my eye. Getting to know the characters and their backstory, the game was an immense undertaking with immense suspense throughout.”
  • humor
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is characterized by a self-deprecating style, blending elements of sadness with comedic moments that invite players to laugh at their own misfortunes.

    • “That may be sad or humorous in an 'at-my-own-expense' kind of way.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy A tractor

16h Median play time
13h Average play time
5-20h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 2 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like A tractor

Games Like A tractor

The Black Death Image
Life is Feudal: MMO Image
Survived By Image
Ylands Image
KINGDOMS ImageKINGDOMS ImageKINGDOMS Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

A tractor is a casual strategy game.

A tractor is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 13 hours playing A tractor.

A tractor was released on August 15, 2018.

A tractor was developed by Games for May.

A tractor has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its humor but disliked it for its gameplay.

A tractor is a multiplayer game with local co-op support.

Similar games include The Black Death, Life is Feudal: MMO, Survived By, Ylands, KINGDOMS and others.