超级捕鱼

About

超级捕鱼 is a single player and multiplayer casual role playing game. It was developed by 超级捕鱼 and was released on February 24, 2022. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

一、基础操作1、游戏内通过点击屏幕的任意区域进行发炮，被击中的鱼有概率死亡； 2、击杀鱼之后，可获得一定数量的金币或钻石作为回报，获得的金币数量与击杀的鱼的倍数有关； 3、炮升级后，点击炮台两侧的+，- 号可进行炮台倍数的切换，未解锁的炮倍数不可使用；二、游戏玩法1、经典捕鱼：是玩家主要的游戏模式； 2、大奖赛：玩家进行竞技与比赛的场次，在此场次玩家可通过比赛获得丰富的游戏道具等； 3、疯狂部落：特殊场次，在该场次内玩家可通过游戏获得稀有的游戏道具； 4、夺宝奇兵：特殊场次，在该场次内玩家使用特殊货币进行游戏，通过游戏可获得丰富的超高级道具；三、成长任务1、根据玩家在游戏内解锁的炮倍数，可获得一定数量的额外金币奖励； 2、免费悬赏：玩家可通过完成特定任务来获得悬赏奖励与悬赏的活跃度奖励； 3、活跃度：达到一定值时可开启活跃度宝箱，活跃度宝箱内包含游戏货币奖励或稀有稀有道具奖励； 4、每…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

72%

Audience ScoreBased on 36 reviews

gameplay2 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

The gameplay is very good and beginner-friendly, making it easy for new players to get started.
The game is free to play and offers a nostalgic experience for those familiar with arcade games.
Despite its cluttered interface, the game provides enjoyable and rewarding gameplay.

The game has a cluttered interface that can be confusing for players.
There are concerns about the game being a repetitive port with potential money-grab mechanics.
The story is minimal or non-existent, which may not appeal to players looking for a narrative experience.

story
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
50%
30%
The game's story is largely criticized for its absence, with many users noting that it lacks a meaningful narrative to support gameplay. Some describe it as having a "once in a blue moon" story, suggesting that any narrative elements present are infrequent and not substantial. Overall, the consensus is that the story is minimal or non-existent.
- “The story is sustainable and supports the gameplay beautifully.”
- “It's a 'once in a blue moon' kind of story that captivates and engages.”
- “This game has no story.”
- “Sustainable story to support gameplay.”
- “"Once in a blue moon" story.”
gameplay
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The gameplay is enhanced by a sustainable story that effectively supports and enriches the overall experience, providing a cohesive narrative that engages players throughout.
- “The gameplay is enhanced by a sustainable story that keeps players engaged.”
- “The integration of a sustainable story significantly supports the overall gameplay experience.”
graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The reviews for the graphics are notably sparse, with users simply repeating the term "graphics" without providing specific feedback or details. This lack of commentary suggests a neutral or undefined perception of the game's visual quality.
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be somewhat excessive at times, indicating that it can feel repetitive or tedious.
- “The game can feel a bit grindy at times.”
- “There are moments when the grinding becomes excessive.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The humor in the game is consistently noted as amusing, with players finding it entertaining and lighthearted. The comedic elements contribute positively to the overall experience, making it enjoyable for a wide audience.
- “The humor in the fish game is absolutely hilarious!”
- “I can't stop laughing at the funny moments in the fish game!”
- “The fish game has a great sense of humor that keeps me entertained!”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The reviews for the music aspect are sparse, with users simply noting the presence of music without providing specific feedback or details. Overall, it appears that the music may not have made a significant impact on the players' experiences.
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The reviews indicate that the game's replayability is limited, with many players feeling that once completed, there is little incentive to revisit it. However, some users appreciate the potential for different playstyles or choices to enhance the experience on subsequent playthroughs. Overall, while there are elements that may encourage replaying, the consensus leans towards a lack of significant replay value.