Zoo Rampage

About

In "Zoo Rampage," players step into the shoes of a gorilla named Ivan determined to escape his enclosure. Wreak havoc in the zoo, avoid obstacles, and solve puzzles to find your path to freedom. With action-packed gameplay and a creative premise, this game offers a unique twist on the traditional shooter genre.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Local Multi-Player Play with friends in the same physical space using split-screen or multiple screens
2-Players Play with one other player, either online or locally, in a cooperative or competitive game mode
Multi-Player Compete or cooperate with other players online
Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo
Split Screen Play with multiple players on the same screen, often with divided or shared screen real estate

59%

Audience ScoreBased on 66 reviews

replayability3 positive mentions

stability3 negative mentions

The game is a fun and silly way to unleash chaos as various animals, providing a light-hearted experience.
Local co-op mode allows for enjoyable multiplayer sessions with friends, making it a good choice for casual gatherings.
It's cheap and offers easy achievements, making it appealing for achievement hunters looking for a quick game.

The game is extremely short, with most players finishing it in under an hour, leading to a lack of replay value.
Gameplay can become repetitive and boring quickly, as there are only a few levels and limited objectives.
The controls and graphics are mediocre, and the game suffers from bugs and poor design choices that detract from the overall experience.

gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
25%
38%
The gameplay is criticized for being shallow and repetitive, with only about an hour of main campaign content and minimal challenge. Players find the levels small and unsatisfying, regardless of the different animals available, leading to an overall experience that feels empty and overpriced. The game is likened to a simplistic blend of classic titles, lacking depth and engagement.
- “1 hour of gameplay (more if you want to 100% it).”
- “I was not expecting much from it, but certainly more than 20 minutes of main campaign length and a bit more challenging gameplay.”
- “Expect GTA 1 meets Smash TV sort of gameplay.”
- “The levels are small, the gameplay is lacking, the destruction is for some reason unsatisfying, and it sort of feels the same no matter the animal choice.”
- “While there are different animals to play as on each map, the overall gameplay felt empty and just wasn't fun.”
- “Even had it been loaded with levels and modes, the core of its gameplay is so simple that it would ultimately be for naught to try and extend an experience that has already grown stale.”
humor
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The humor in the game is noted for its absurdity and deviation from real-life terror, providing a comedic twist that resonates with players. While some find the difficulty detracts from the fun, many appreciate the short yet genuinely funny moments throughout the gameplay. Overall, the game is recognized as entertainingly humorous.
- “Because it's hilariously deviant from what would be terrifying in real life.”
- “Short, but funny!”
- “Really funny game :D”
- “The humor falls flat and feels forced.”
- “I expected more laughs, but it just wasn't funny.”
- “The jokes are stale and fail to land.”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game has been criticized for its stability, with users reporting significant bugs, including character movement issues and severe lag, which detracts from the overall experience.
- “But the game is a little buggy; sometimes the characters don't move, or the game lags really hard.”
- “Boring and buggy game.”
- “Doesn't matter if it's repetitive, buggy, or mobileware.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The graphics have been described as bulky and mediocre, receiving a rating of 3.5 out of 10, indicating a lack of polish and overall quality.
- “The graphics are quite bulky.”
- “Graphics: 3.5/10”
- “Mediocre graphics.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
100%
The game has limited replayability, primarily due to a lack of diverse modes and objectives, which leads to a sense of monotony after completing the levels. Players with less proficient gamepad skills may find the experience frustrating, diminishing their motivation to replay. Overall, the game fails to offer enough content to encourage repeated playthroughs.
- “The game offers a wealth of different paths and choices, making each playthrough feel unique and engaging.”
- “With multiple endings and various character builds, I find myself coming back to explore new strategies and outcomes.”
- “The dynamic events and random elements ensure that no two playthroughs are ever the same, keeping the experience fresh and exciting.”
- “Little replay value, especially if you are like me and have less than 10% of the gamepad skills of a 12-year-old. You need a gamepad; WASD controls are abysmal for this kind of game. Because my gamepad skills are weak, I replayed most levels several times until I just stopped on one. The game stopped being fun, and maybe I will play more of it another day, and perhaps someday finish...?”
- “Given the price of the game, I thought there was going to be more in terms of different modes, in-game objectives, etc. However, this was not the case and has left me a little disappointed with its apparent lack of replayability once you have cycled through the levels.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The story is generally perceived as shallow, lacking depth and complexity, with players advised not to expect a profound narrative or intricate gameplay.
- “Don't come into this looking for some deep plot or in-depth gameplay.”
- “The story feels disjointed and lacks any real emotional impact.”
- “Character development is shallow, making it hard to care about their journeys.”