Zombie Hunter

About

Zombie Hunter is a single player action game. It was developed by 1MB and was released on October 4, 2021. It received neutral reviews from players.

Take your guns and start killing zombies in the best FPS Shooting game

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

51%

Audience ScoreBased on 53 reviews

humor1 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

The game is fun and full of action, making it enjoyable for players who like shooters.
It offers a good practice environment for first-person shooter skills.
The energy regeneration rate is decent, allowing for some gameplay without constant waiting.

The game is heavily reliant on microtransactions, making it feel like a pay-to-win experience.
Players experience significant lag and technical issues, even on newer systems.
The game is a poor port of a mobile game, with clunky controls and low-quality graphics.

story
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
79%
21%
The story aspect of the game is criticized for being incoherent and poorly structured, with players facing significant progression barriers unless they spend real money on upgrades. Many missions are described as frustratingly unplayable due to design flaws, and the overall narrative fails to engage, leaving users feeling stuck and dissatisfied.
- “Even the description of the story doesn't make sense.”
- “But the worst thing is that, if you don't pay any real money for new weapons, you'll eventually reach a point where you can't progress through the story.”
- “Literally any upgraded weapon you have has the 'not recommended' tag for any mission, so you can't even grind money to get new and better weapons, because there is no mission that you can play to farm money.”
graphics
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
62%
38%
The graphics of the game have been widely criticized, with many reviewers describing them as reminiscent of PS1-era visuals and comparing them unfavorably to other mobile games. While some acknowledge that the gameplay may be decent for a mobile port, the overall graphical quality is deemed mediocre and unappealing, detracting from the gaming experience.
- “Awful port of an awful pay-to-win mobile game with PS1 graphics.”
- “Good mobile game, but this game reminds me of the mobile game 'Sniper 3D', which has much better graphics compared to this PC rip-off.”
- “A boring mobile version of a game with PS1 graphics.”
gameplay
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
33%
50%
The gameplay is criticized for being lackluster and hindered by an energy mechanic that limits player engagement, making it difficult to enjoy fast-paced play. While the mobile port manages to translate gameplay adequately, technical issues like unresponsive menus detract from the overall experience, alongside poor graphics and sound.
- “For a mobile port, it is pretty decent; the gameplay translates well, and that's what matters, not the graphics.”
- “Shitty mobile shooter with an energy mechanic, so you can't even try to 'speedrun' it.”
- “Menu doesn't work properly; the cursor disappears at the end of the mission, and I have to alt+F4 from the game to continue. Graphics are horrible, sounds are boring, and gameplay is boring too.”
- “For a mobile port, it is pretty decent; the gameplay translates, that's what matters, not the graphics.”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The monetization strategy of the game has been heavily criticized for being exploitative, with numerous microtransactions that hinder progress unless players pay. Many users feel that the game is essentially a cash grab, prioritizing profit over player experience.
- “The game offers a variety of in-game purchases, but it can feel like progress is hindered unless you invest money.”
- “While the game is free to play, it heavily relies on mobile app store-like microtransactions that can impact the overall experience.”
- “There are numerous ways to enhance your gameplay through in-game purchases, but it may feel like a paywall exists for significant progress.”
- “On pricing and value for gamers, this isn't really free as the game is infested with mobile app store-like microtransactions.”
- “This game is nothing but a huge cash grab/scam!”
- “The game has a lot of in-game purchases and ways to stop your progress, except if you pay for them.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
Players note that grinding in the game can be time-consuming, often requiring significant hours of farming to progress through levels. Some feel pressured by the game's monetization strategy, which offers the option to bypass this grind through costly microtransactions.
- “Grinding in this game is incredibly rewarding and keeps you engaged.”
- “The grind is satisfying and offers a real sense of progression.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “The only challenge may be from the manipulative marketing that causes you to either spend several hours farming every level or spend roughly $180+ to skip the microtransaction wall.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is often described as vulgar and lowbrow, reminiscent of titles like "Conker's Bad Fur Day," which some players find amusing despite its crude elements.
- “I suppose that people also thought that Conker's Bad Fur Day was vulgar; it's low poly and kind of funny.”