Yet another tower defence

About

Yet another tower defence is a single player casual strategy game. It was developed by Fantasy Li and was released on November 1, 2018. It received neutral reviews from players.

"Yet Another Tower Defense" is a traditional tower defense game with a 3D twist, featuring numerous towers, demons, and challenging bosses. Gather energy, exploit its power, and take advantage of item drops to aid you in battle. With easy-to-learn gameplay and added mini-games, this title offers a fun and engaging experience.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

57%

Audience ScoreBased on 98 reviews

graphics16 positive mentions

story4 negative mentions

The game features surprisingly good graphics for its low price, making it visually appealing.
Gameplay is fun and addictive, with a decent level of challenge that keeps players engaged.
The game includes a variety of towers and enemies, allowing for different strategies and tactics.

The game suffers from poor UI design, including a confusing tower upgrade system and camera controls that hinder gameplay.
Many players find the difficulty spikes to be frustrating, making the game feel unbalanced and sometimes unplayable.
There are numerous technical issues, such as bugs and low-quality assets, which detract from the overall experience.

graphics
34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
47%
44%
9%
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating the cute 3D visuals and detailed backgrounds, especially considering the low price point. While some users noted that the graphics are better than expected for a budget title, others pointed out that they lack high quality and can feel simplistic or reminiscent of older games. Overall, the graphics are generally seen as enjoyable and suitable for the game's genre, though not groundbreaking.
- “The graphics and soundtrack are better than expected.”
- “The graphics are remarkably detailed for a game that costs $2.29.”
- “Enjoyable and inexpensive tower defense title with very good graphics.”
- “ Simple & basic graphics like the year 2001.”
- “Despite this game having bad graphics, the animation of the tower and weird item/gameplay... at least the game gives you easy achievements and heck, it even encourages you to cheat in the game... lmao.”
- “Graphics look a lot like hell girls.”
gameplay
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
36%
21%
The gameplay is described as addictive and easy to learn, featuring classic mechanics where players fend off enemies using towers and power-ups. Despite its simplistic graphics and animations, the game offers a fun and challenging experience, allowing players to achieve a significant portion of its content in about 20 hours. However, the gameplay could feel repetitive, as the core mechanics remain unchanged regardless of the visual elements.
- “Pretty addictive gameplay.”
- “Gameplay is so easy to learn, fun and challenging that it seems short: to complete all maps, with more than 90% achievements, takes about 20 hours.”
- “Mechanics is the genre's classical one: the player must avoid foes arriving at the end of pathways, killing them with armed towers and power-ups or special attacks.”
- “Despite this game having bad graphics, the animation of the tower, and weird item/gameplay, at least the game gives you easy achievements and, heck, it even encourages you to cheat in the game.”
- “The mechanics are the genre's classical ones: the player must avoid foes arriving at the end of pathways, killing them with armed towers and power-ups or special attacks.”
- “All cannons and monsters could be replaced with simple geometric figures of boxes or triangles, with an upgrade system like 'upgrade #1, #2, #3', and we would find no difference in gameplay.”
humor
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is generally well-received, with players appreciating the funny descriptions of towers, enemies, and abilities that cleverly hint at their functions. However, some users find certain aspects of the humor to be lame or annoying, indicating a mixed reception overall.
- “ Funny description to let players guess the real function.”
- “- Funny description of towers, enemies, and abilities.”
- “This game just has my sense of humor when it comes to the descriptions.”
story
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The game's story is criticized for being minimal and lacking depth, with many players feeling it resembles a "fluff-lite" experience that fails to engage them. Reviewers express disappointment over the absence of a substantial narrative, suggesting that even basic storytelling elements could have enhanced player engagement. Overall, the lack of a compelling story is seen as a significant drawback.
- “Sadly, the game is fluff-lite, something that a lot of games are these days, which is odd because it requires no programming know-how to add a story and help the player get engaged in the story.”
- “- no story”
- “I just wish the game would have been bigger, and the lack of a story is also a point that I find sad.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is criticized for having no replay value, indicating that players do not find incentives to revisit it after completing it.
- “No replay value.”
- “No replay value.”
- “No replay value.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The music in the game has received positive feedback, with users noting that both the soundtrack and graphics exceed their expectations.
- “The graphics and soundtrack are better than expected.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The grinding aspect of the game is widely criticized as being terrible and uninspired, with many players finding it bland, boring, and tedious. Overall, it is viewed as an insulting experience that detracts from the enjoyment of the game.
- “Terrible, bland, generic, uninspired, boring, tedious, insulting.”
- “Terrible, bland, generic, uninspired, boring, tedious, insulting.”