World Of Walking Cities

About

Many years ago the world was struck by enormous catastrophe. And now the survivors should to keep moving to stay alive. Control the nomadic city, look for the resources, develop your city and keep a grain of civilization behind its rusty walls!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

15%

Audience ScoreBased on 13 reviews

gameplay2 negative mentions

The installation process on Windows 10 is smooth and the game menu is user-friendly.
The game concept is intriguing, reminiscent of the movie Mortal Engines, which could appeal to fans of post-apocalyptic themes.
There is potential for improvement and development, making it worth a look for players who enjoy experimental games.

The game is plagued with bugs, lacks a tutorial, and provides no clear instructions on gameplay mechanics.
Combat and resource management systems are poorly designed, leading to confusion and a lack of meaningful upgrades.
Overall, the game feels unfinished and lacks content, making it difficult to recommend at its current state.

gameplay
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The gameplay has been criticized for its lack of substance, with users noting that it is difficult to define or even recognize as gameplay due to the absence of a coherent structure or engaging mechanics.
- “The gameplay of this creation is even hard to name as gameplay.”
- “There is no history, no gameplay.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The story aspect of the game has been criticized for its lack of introduction and context, as players feel abruptly placed in a desert setting without any narrative guidance or objectives provided.
- “At the start of a new game, we are simply thrown into a desert, without any story being told or an explanation of what needs to be done.”
- “The narrative feels disjointed and lacks coherence, making it difficult to engage with the characters or the plot.”
- “There are too many plot holes and unanswered questions that leave the player feeling unsatisfied and confused.”
graphics
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The graphics received a rating of 4, indicating a generally positive reception. Reviewers appreciate the visual quality, though specific details about what stands out or could be improved are not provided. Overall, the graphics contribute positively to the gaming experience.
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with a score of 3 indicating that while it may have some redeeming qualities, it generally falls short of expectations. Players find the sound design to be average, lacking the impact or memorability that enhances the overall gaming experience.
- “The music is repetitive and lacks variety, making it feel monotonous after a short while.”
- “The sound effects are poorly mixed, often drowning out the music and making it hard to enjoy.”
- “The soundtrack feels generic and uninspired, failing to enhance the overall gaming experience.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The monetization strategy of the game has raised concerns among users, with some perceiving it as a potential cash grab unless the developers make significant improvements. Reviewers express a willingness to revise their opinions if the game's quality enhances.
- “Unless the developers really put some effort in, it seems this might have just been a cash grab game. I'll change my review if they turn it around.”
- “The monetization strategy feels overly aggressive, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending money.”
- “It's frustrating that so many features are locked behind paywalls, which ruins the overall experience.”